13 thoughts on “News/Politics 7-7-26”

  1. Revisionist history from the same clowns who gave him a pass for his Nazi tattoo, rape fantasies, and inappropriate acts toward women in the past. There were earlier allegations of sexual assault too, but they ignored those because the victim was a Republican woman.

    https://x.com/i/status/2074301449954021827

    “Scott Jennings just blew up the Democrats’ favorite excuse.

    They’re now claiming Graham Platner wasn’t properly vetted, but Jennings wasn’t buying it for a second.

    He reminded the CNN panel that prominent Democrats like Ro Khanna, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Tim Walz all knew about Platner’s past — and backed him anyway.

    JENNINGS: “The only thing I disagree with is when she said that he hadn’t been vetted.”“No, he had been vetted!”

    “All of the things that have been stated, it was all out in the public and people like Ro Khanna, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Tim Walz, the Bulwark, Pod Save America, all these people came together to overlook it all, to explain it all, to rationalize it all.”

    “He was vetted. People knew all these things and a whole bunch of Democrats in Maine showed up and voted for him anyway. And a bunch of donors from around the country sent him money anyway.”

    “I agree with Alyssa’s question. What changed? Why are you bailing on Graham Platner now?!”

    “You already signed off on Nazi tattoo, a self-described communist, somebody who’s had rape fantasies, somebody who has been on a social media platform known as a playground for predators.”

    “And on and on and on and on and on.”

    “And the difference between this accuser and the previous one is simply this, she’s a liberal. It’s okay, I guess, for Democrats that their candidate’s assault conservatives.”

    “But he broke into someone’s house. And apparently, according to her, raped her. And because her politics are correct, they can now believe it.”

    “All of this whole thing is disgusting. But to say that they hadn’t vetted him, or that they didn’t know about all this is totally false.”

    “They knew it and they signed up for it, and I don’t know why they’re backing away from this scumbag today when they had already signed off on all that other crazy behavior.””

    Like

    Reply

  4. You don’t hate the media enough…

    The NYTimes is absolute trash.

    This is what they did to the Republican accuser.

    https://x.com/i/status/2074458074983596378

    “I actually understand why Democrat leaders didn’t take our stories seriously when the Times reported them in June but are taking them seriously now.

    It was by design.

    The line most shared from the piece was the claim that the Times “could not corroborate” my story despite talking to two of my friends.

    I gave them the contact information for five friends.

    They called the two who I clarified would not know about the abuse but would be able to affirm our relationship timeline, events, etc.

    They simply did not call the other three.

    I also gave them the names of all my former roommates who remembered him stalking our row house (which was about 5 houses down from his) and waiting for me to return. I gave them screenshots of messages between these roommates and I discussing it.

    I gave them the names of other men I dated who might have remembered him following us around the hill and showing up on my stoop after we walked home from dates to confront us. I gave them emails to my landlord urgently ending my lease and moving to an apartment across town and diary entries talking about it – all time marked.

    I told them that during pre-marital counseling I had spoken to my ex-fiance about the abuse because I had to explain to him why I reacted with such terror any time he lost his temper. They said oh NO we don’t need to bother HIM (or my priest). Besides, I had written about it in my diary in detail, they reassured.

    As the weeks dragged on I stopped trying to give them evidence because the amount I had already given them seemed to overwhelm them and I thought it meant they clearly had more than enough to verify my every claim.

    My friends might not have known the details of the abuse, but they affirmed that yes, I had told them that he was abusive—long before he ran for Senate.

    Besides, they assured, my part in their reporting would be small. I thought my details would only serve to affirm Jenny and the other anonymous woman.

    Jenny and I – having never met or spoken – both shared with these reporters terrifyingly similar details of intimate partner violence, coercive control, and cycles of abuse/love bombing. The third unnamed woman in the story did as well.

    But tell me again how they “could not corroborate.””

    Like

    Reply

  7. “I hope these folks rescinding their endorsements and calling on Platner to drop out will consider calling Lyndsey Fifield to apologize. Doesn’t need to be public, but she warned them before the primary and they attacked her. Reminds me of Rob Hur on Biden’s mental fitness.”

    https://x.com/i/status/2074294574281797831

    “And btw Jenny Racicot is a hero. She saw another woman with different political beliefs get attacked and shamed for telling the truth and instead of keeping her head down—she ran to defend her at the risk of her own safety and reputation. That takes real guts these days.”

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  8. It’s the 50 Intel Agents Op all over again.

    https://x.com/i/status/2074521347892416585

    “I’m so tired of this.

    The Justice Department is NOT independent. And it CANNOT be independent under the U.S. Constitution.

    Therefore, under the Left’s logic of Barfare/Lawfare, every lawyer who signed this letter should be disbarred for arguing from an illegal premise and endorsing a flatly unconstitutional legal theory.

    Moreover, the idea that 1,200 Democrat lawyers (and fellow traveler RINOs probably) oppose Todd Blanche being confirmed as AG proves nothing except how political they are.

    The President gets to make his own Cabinet choices. The Constitution doesn’t operate as a lawyers’ plebiscite.”

    Like

    Reply

  12. The Lincoln Project clowns are trying to deny history as well.

    But X remembers…. 😁

    https://x.com/i/status/2074287616585781286

    “Left clip, June 7. Molly Jong-Fast tees up Rick Wilson to smear the Platner accuser as a right wing operative

    Right clip, Today. Fast is dismayed that Democrats ran Platner without proper vetting

    “I don’t know we got here!”

    Media revisionism on this is going to be next level”

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment