15 thoughts on “News/Politics 1-17-23

  1. So when it’s an R president that has a legal right to have classified documents going after them is saving democracy, but when it’s a D president holding docs he had no right to take as VP it’s just a game.

    “Democrat Ilhan Omar: Investigations Into Biden Classified Document Scandal Are A ‘Political Game’”


    “More damaging information came out throughout the week, including subsequent classified documents found at Biden’s home in Delaware.

    U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced last week that he had appointed former U.S. Attorney Robert Hur — who served during the Trump administration — to be special counsel in the investigation after the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois John Lausch, who was assigned to do an initial review of the case, recommended to Garland that a special counsel be appointed.

    Omar made the remarks during an interview Saturday with Symone Sanders when she claimed that Republicans defended Trump after he “literally stole classified documents.”

    Omar claimed that Trump “refused to turn them over, lied about having them, made up some story about how he declassified them, [and] had to have his house raided in order for those documents to be found.”

    Omar insisted that those same Republicans “are now only interested in investigating Biden, who has cooperated, whose own staff and former staff have themselves turned these documents in.”

    “You have to understand, Republicans aren’t really interested in upholding the law, in following security protocols,” she said. “What they’re interested in is playing a political game in now only wanting to investigate Biden.”

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Conveniently….

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Sure, but only when the offender is a Democrat, right?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Liked by 1 person

  5. And Mona destroyed her career to shill for him….


  6. This is what collusion looks like.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Money laundering scheme…

    But it’s OK, the Bidens are Democrats, right?

    And tax evasion for Joe? Because he didn’t claim it on his taxes.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Yes, threatening the base is sure to work.

    Idiots run the RNC.


  9. Fascists rule Canada now.

    “Outrageous but unsurprising: Canadian judge tosses case against guards who killed a woman for not wearing a mask”


    “Toronto hospital security guards killed a woman in March of 2020. For not pulling up a mask while suffering from breathing difficulties.

    They were originally charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, but a judge has tossed the case because … reasons.

    There isn’t much dispute about what happened, although one of the guards involved intentionally turned a security camera away from the scene of the crime as it was happening, and another lied to police about what happened. He later was forced to admit to deceiving investigators when he was shown security footage contradicting his statement.

    That’s OK though. He apologized, saying “I would have never said the things I said in there if I knew there was a video.” All good, then. That’s some world-class remorse.”

    “The case seems pretty cut and dried. Danielle Stephanie Warriner, who suffered from COPD came to the hospital due to, unsurprisingly, breathing problems. She was admitted to the hospital, and was sitting in a hallway wearing PPE. She had lowered her mask due to her breathing problems. Guards approached her to enforce a mask mandate. She didn’t comply, again presumably because she had trouble breathing.

    The guards donned PPE, demanded she don the mask, and then threw her against the wall almost immediately. While claiming that she struck them first, the video shows that this wasn’t true.

    Right after throwing her to a wall, a different guard redirects the camera away from the incident, hiding what was happening. He “panicked,” so turning the camera away clearly didn’t show any consciousness of guilt, right?

    Witnesses report the guards threw her to the ground, held her there in exactly the same manner that George Floyd was restrained (knee to the back using body weight). Only she had taken no meth or fentanyl. She was a 125-pound woman with breathing difficulties, as she told them.

    They handcuffed her while unconscious and kept her restrained using a knee to the back. She stopped breathing. The guards load her into a wheelchair and eventually notice this fact and call for doctors. She subsequently died from her injuries, having never returned to consciousness.

    The guards killed her. A women in respiratory distress in a hospital hallway, there to be treated.

    Oh, Canada!

    The guards were charged and awaiting trial but the Ontario judge made the unusual decision to toss the case, surprising nearly everybody.

    Amanda Rojas-Silva, 42, and Shane Hutley, 35, had been charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence in Warriner’s death — charges they denied, saying they used only the force necessary to gain a hold of her.

    Now, those charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial — a decision CBC News has learned the Crown won’t appeal.

    That’s despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.”

    Liked by 1 person

  10. The video.


    “So there is footage of the guards attacking her unprovoked, used excessive force to restrain her, lied about the incident, a pathologist testified that she would have been alive but for their actions, and the video and facts of the case now being used in training as an example of what not to do.

    A coroner’s report would conclude Warriner died from a brain injury resulting from a lack of oxygen “due to restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion,” with her underlying lung disease a possible factor.

    “But for her interaction with the Applicants, Ms. Warriner would likely be alive today,” the forensic pathologist testified at the preliminary hearing, according to the Crown.

    Lawyers for the accused argued the forensic pathologist lacked the expertise to come to that conclusion.

    Still, in quashing the case, Superior Court Justice Sean Dunphy noted, “There is evidence that death could have been the culmination of the factors he described.”

    The judge threw out the case. Because COVID hysteria created an environment when such actions are understandable.

    Oh, did I say she didn’t have COVID? Nope, she didn’t. She was suffering due to her COPD, not anything transmissible. Of course, in Canada killing off sick people is a positive good, anyway.”

    Liked by 1 person

  11. This is tragic on so many levels.


    I cannot stress that enough. And a further indictment of our garbage press who refuses to report on this.

    “TAPES: We Investigated a Suburban LGBTQ Pedophile Ring. Here’s What We Found.”

    “This is Part 1 of a four-part investigative series.

    Content Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of child sexual abuse. Reader discretion is advised.”


    “A months-long Townhall investigation reveals disturbing new details about the affluent LGBTQ-activist couple accused of sodomizing their young adopted sons—now ages 9 and 11—and distributing “homemade” child pornography of the sexual abuse. Half a year after the shocking story made national news, Townhall is the only outlet following up on the criminal case in Georgia that has since seen zero headlines written about it. We’ve found that it’s far, far worse than what was first reported.

    Not only did the married men allegedly rape the two boys who were adopted through a Christian special-needs adoption agency, they were pimping out their children to nearby pedophiles in Atlanta-area suburbs, Townhall’s follow-up investigation discovered.

    Recorded jailhouse calls, a trove of never-before-seen court documents, and testimony from a family member who spoke exclusively with Townhall uncover the extent of the physical and emotional trauma the two elementary school-aged brothers endured as well as the red flags that the state overlooked during the same-sex couple’s “faster than expected” adoption process.

    As Townhall reported in August, the suspects were darlings of the LGBTQ media. They were part of an anti-gay hate campaign promoting “#NOH8,” and Out magazine, which holds the nation’s highest circulation among LGBTQ monthly publications, has repeatedly asked them if its website’s Pride page can feature their photos taken at the Atlanta Pride Parade.


    The adoptive fathers, 33-year-old government worker William Dale Zulock Jr. and 35-year-old banker Zachary “Zack” Jacoby Zulock—who was previously accused of raping a child—from Oxford, Georgia, have been indicted by a grand jury on charges of incest, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, felony sexual exploitation of children, and felony prostitution of a minor.

    William and Zachary are each facing over nine life sentences. They’ve pleaded not guilty.”


    “The indictment also charges the Zulock co-defendants with soliciting two other men, through the use of popular social media platforms, in the Greater Atlanta metropolitan region to “perform an act of prostitution” with their child that suffered physical injuries from being brutally raped. Townhall is the first to publicly identify these two alleged members of a pedophile ring in the heart of the Peach State: 27-year-old Hunter Clay Lawless and 25-year-old Luis Armando Vizcarro-Sanchez, both of Loganville.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.