So when it’s an R president that has a legal right to have classified documents going after them is saving democracy, but when it’s a D president holding docs he had no right to take as VP it’s just a game.
“Democrat Ilhan Omar: Investigations Into Biden Classified Document Scandal Are A ‘Political Game’”
“More damaging information came out throughout the week, including subsequent classified documents found at Biden’s home in Delaware.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced last week that he had appointed former U.S. Attorney Robert Hur — who served during the Trump administration — to be special counsel in the investigation after the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois John Lausch, who was assigned to do an initial review of the case, recommended to Garland that a special counsel be appointed.
Omar made the remarks during an interview Saturday with Symone Sanders when she claimed that Republicans defended Trump after he “literally stole classified documents.”
Omar claimed that Trump “refused to turn them over, lied about having them, made up some story about how he declassified them, [and] had to have his house raided in order for those documents to be found.”
Omar insisted that those same Republicans “are now only interested in investigating Biden, who has cooperated, whose own staff and former staff have themselves turned these documents in.”
“You have to understand, Republicans aren’t really interested in upholding the law, in following security protocols,” she said. “What they’re interested in is playing a political game in now only wanting to investigate Biden.”
.@RichardDreyfuss tells me he gave up acting "ONLY for something I loved as much, which was saving my country…It infuriates me that people don't understand what this place means." pic.twitter.com/Zxshkqa0aJ
Do you believe that if there were an investigation of a threat against POTUS, in which it was relevant to know who visited POTUS in DE on which days over last 23 mos, that Secret Service would not be able to tell the FBI that? I don’t.
“If Secret Service is doing its job, there has to be visitor records,” Tom Fitton, president of conservative transparency group @JudicialWatch, told @NYPost in Oct. “If there aren’t any records, the scandal is much bigger than just a lack of transparency.” https://t.co/2zvcRPmXjZ
The Secret Service does background checks on everyone who meets with the president, but the White House wants you to believe there's no visitor log at Biden's Wilmington home.
Reminder, Biden has spent 1/4 of his entire presidency in Delaware.
Impossible that there are zero records of people who have come to the sitting President of the U.S. personal home. This is a blatant lie to say there is no record. I don’t believe this and neither should anyone else.
Funny, security violations are deemed pretty nefarious when it’s regular folk who are the ones committing them. They actually go to prison. I thought that President Biden said.. “No one is above the law.” Yet, here we are… 🙄
We here at mitrebox are proud to announce our first news segment entitled "It do really be like that sometimes" where we will feature a bold look at accidental truth. https://t.co/vI2E9Cr09q
Bulwark etc all created an elderly statesman like grandfather version of Biden who never existed except in their heads to justify selling their entire professional souls to him. Biden has never been better than this. They used to tell us so. pic.twitter.com/O4hobG3P00
2. In 2020, it was clear that the pandemic would require rapid innovation. Early on, there was a push to make the solution equitable: an international partnership to share ideas, technology, new forms of medicine to rapidly solve this crisis. https://t.co/L4QNcCCzCE
4. BIO, the lobby group that represents biopharma, including Moderna & Pfizer, wrote to the newly elected Biden admin, demanding the U.S. gov sanction any country attempting to violate patent rights and create generic low cost covid medicine or vaccines. https://t.co/EOX8HoYD46
6. Twitter's reps responded quickly to the pharma request, which was also backed by the German government. A lobbyist in Europe asked the content moderation team to monitor the accounts of Pfizer, AstraZeneca & of activist hashtags like #peoplesvaccinepic.twitter.com/Bt9YNJUlN1
8. It's not clear what actions Twitter ultimately took on this particular request. Several Twitter employees noted in subsequent messages that none of this activism constituted abuse. But the company continued monitoring tweets.
10. BIO provided $1,275,000 to the campaign, part of which is revealed through tax forms. The PGP campaign, called "Stronger," helped Twitter create content moderation bots, select which public health accounts got verification, helped crowdsource content takedowns. pic.twitter.com/emWC2Dmg3E
12. The Moderna/Pfizer-funded campaign included direct regular emails with lists of tweets to takedown & others to verify. Here's an example of those types of emails that went straight to Twitter's lobbyists and content moderators. Many focused on @zerohedge, which was suspended. pic.twitter.com/wNPPx1IiRD
14. Here is my reported piece w/more detail. I was given some access to Twitter emails. I signed/agreed to nothing, Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by a Twitter attorney, so what I saw could be limited. https://t.co/McEaKZ2MKX
Threats incoming today. One of Ronna's state chair supporters responded to my message about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy by threatening me with consequences if I didn't make the "annoying" text messages from voters stop (no one on my team has asked anyone to text members)/
3/ To be very clear, no amount of threats to me or my team, or bigoted attacks on my faith traceable directly to associates of the chair, will deter me from advancing positive change at the RNC, which includes new standards of accountability, transparency, integrity, and decency.
“Toronto hospital security guards killed a woman in March of 2020. For not pulling up a mask while suffering from breathing difficulties.
They were originally charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, but a judge has tossed the case because … reasons.
There isn’t much dispute about what happened, although one of the guards involved intentionally turned a security camera away from the scene of the crime as it was happening, and another lied to police about what happened. He later was forced to admit to deceiving investigators when he was shown security footage contradicting his statement.
That’s OK though. He apologized, saying “I would have never said the things I said in there if I knew there was a video.” All good, then. That’s some world-class remorse.”
Warriner was presumed to have COVID-19 and had her mask down. Video shows guards confronting her. Less than three minutes later after the altercation, she's wheeled away unconscious – never to wake up again. https://t.co/3OPo4HeS88
“The case seems pretty cut and dried. Danielle Stephanie Warriner, who suffered from COPD came to the hospital due to, unsurprisingly, breathing problems. She was admitted to the hospital, and was sitting in a hallway wearing PPE. She had lowered her mask due to her breathing problems. Guards approached her to enforce a mask mandate. She didn’t comply, again presumably because she had trouble breathing.
The guards donned PPE, demanded she don the mask, and then threw her against the wall almost immediately. While claiming that she struck them first, the video shows that this wasn’t true.
Right after throwing her to a wall, a different guard redirects the camera away from the incident, hiding what was happening. He “panicked,” so turning the camera away clearly didn’t show any consciousness of guilt, right?
Witnesses report the guards threw her to the ground, held her there in exactly the same manner that George Floyd was restrained (knee to the back using body weight). Only she had taken no meth or fentanyl. She was a 125-pound woman with breathing difficulties, as she told them.
They handcuffed her while unconscious and kept her restrained using a knee to the back. She stopped breathing. The guards load her into a wheelchair and eventually notice this fact and call for doctors. She subsequently died from her injuries, having never returned to consciousness.
The guards killed her. A women in respiratory distress in a hospital hallway, there to be treated.
Oh, Canada!
The guards were charged and awaiting trial but the Ontario judge made the unusual decision to toss the case, surprising nearly everybody.
Amanda Rojas-Silva, 42, and Shane Hutley, 35, had been charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence in Warriner’s death — charges they denied, saying they used only the force necessary to gain a hold of her.
Now, those charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial — a decision CBC News has learned the Crown won’t appeal.
That’s despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.”
Here is the video from CBC News of her being restrained for not wearing her mask. Afterwards her lifeless body is wheeled away. A coroner's report stated she died from a brain injury resulting from a lack of oxygen "due to restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion.” pic.twitter.com/jSbhmvHgTp
“So there is footage of the guards attacking her unprovoked, used excessive force to restrain her, lied about the incident, a pathologist testified that she would have been alive but for their actions, and the video and facts of the case now being used in training as an example of what not to do.
A coroner’s report would conclude Warriner died from a brain injury resulting from a lack of oxygen “due to restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion,” with her underlying lung disease a possible factor.
“But for her interaction with the Applicants, Ms. Warriner would likely be alive today,” the forensic pathologist testified at the preliminary hearing, according to the Crown.
Lawyers for the accused argued the forensic pathologist lacked the expertise to come to that conclusion.
Still, in quashing the case, Superior Court Justice Sean Dunphy noted, “There is evidence that death could have been the culmination of the factors he described.”
The judge threw out the case. Because COVID hysteria created an environment when such actions are understandable.
Oh, did I say she didn’t have COVID? Nope, she didn’t. She was suffering due to her COPD, not anything transmissible. Of course, in Canada killing off sick people is a positive good, anyway.”
“A months-long Townhall investigation reveals disturbing new details about the affluent LGBTQ-activist couple accused of sodomizing their young adopted sons—now ages 9 and 11—and distributing “homemade” child pornography of the sexual abuse. Half a year after the shocking story made national news, Townhall is the only outlet following up on the criminal case in Georgia that has since seen zero headlines written about it. We’ve found that it’s far, far worse than what was first reported.
Not only did the married men allegedly rape the two boys who were adopted through a Christian special-needs adoption agency, they were pimping out their children to nearby pedophiles in Atlanta-area suburbs, Townhall’s follow-up investigation discovered.
Recorded jailhouse calls, a trove of never-before-seen court documents, and testimony from a family member who spoke exclusively with Townhall uncover the extent of the physical and emotional trauma the two elementary school-aged brothers endured as well as the red flags that the state overlooked during the same-sex couple’s “faster than expected” adoption process.
As Townhall reported in August, the suspects were darlings of the LGBTQ media. They were part of an anti-gay hate campaign promoting “#NOH8,” and Out magazine, which holds the nation’s highest circulation among LGBTQ monthly publications, has repeatedly asked them if its website’s Pride page can feature their photos taken at the Atlanta Pride Parade.
Charges
The adoptive fathers, 33-year-old government worker William Dale Zulock Jr. and 35-year-old banker Zachary “Zack” Jacoby Zulock—who was previously accused of raping a child—from Oxford, Georgia, have been indicted by a grand jury on charges of incest, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, felony sexual exploitation of children, and felony prostitution of a minor.
William and Zachary are each facing over nine life sentences. They’ve pleaded not guilty.”
—-
“The indictment also charges the Zulock co-defendants with soliciting two other men, through the use of popular social media platforms, in the Greater Atlanta metropolitan region to “perform an act of prostitution” with their child that suffered physical injuries from being brutally raped. Townhall is the first to publicly identify these two alleged members of a pedophile ring in the heart of the Peach State: 27-year-old Hunter Clay Lawless and 25-year-old Luis Armando Vizcarro-Sanchez, both of Loganville.”
Wandering Views 
So when it’s an R president that has a legal right to have classified documents going after them is saving democracy, but when it’s a D president holding docs he had no right to take as VP it’s just a game.
“Democrat Ilhan Omar: Investigations Into Biden Classified Document Scandal Are A ‘Political Game’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-ilhan-omar-investigations-into-biden-classified-document-scandal-are-a-political-game
“More damaging information came out throughout the week, including subsequent classified documents found at Biden’s home in Delaware.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced last week that he had appointed former U.S. Attorney Robert Hur — who served during the Trump administration — to be special counsel in the investigation after the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois John Lausch, who was assigned to do an initial review of the case, recommended to Garland that a special counsel be appointed.
Omar made the remarks during an interview Saturday with Symone Sanders when she claimed that Republicans defended Trump after he “literally stole classified documents.”
Omar claimed that Trump “refused to turn them over, lied about having them, made up some story about how he declassified them, [and] had to have his house raided in order for those documents to be found.”
Omar insisted that those same Republicans “are now only interested in investigating Biden, who has cooperated, whose own staff and former staff have themselves turned these documents in.”
“You have to understand, Republicans aren’t really interested in upholding the law, in following security protocols,” she said. “What they’re interested in is playing a political game in now only wanting to investigate Biden.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 2 people
Conveniently….
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, Ilhan Omar knows all about politics. They have served her well, unfortunately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure, but only when the offender is a Democrat, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reich seems confused. He was for Moderna, in fact pushed the vaccines pretty hard, before he was against it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep.
“Mark Levin explains why the Biden classified doc timeline ‘stinks to high heaven’”
LikeLiked by 1 person
And Mona destroyed her career to shill for him….
LikeLike
This is what collusion looks like.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Money laundering scheme…
But it’s OK, the Bidens are Democrats, right?
And tax evasion for Joe? Because he didn’t claim it on his taxes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, threatening the base is sure to work.
Idiots run the RNC.
LikeLike
Fascists rule Canada now.
“Outrageous but unsurprising: Canadian judge tosses case against guards who killed a woman for not wearing a mask”
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/01/16/outrageous-but-unsurprising-canadian-judge-tosses-case-against-guards-who-killed-a-woman-for-not-wearing-a-mask-n524001
“Toronto hospital security guards killed a woman in March of 2020. For not pulling up a mask while suffering from breathing difficulties.
They were originally charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, but a judge has tossed the case because … reasons.
There isn’t much dispute about what happened, although one of the guards involved intentionally turned a security camera away from the scene of the crime as it was happening, and another lied to police about what happened. He later was forced to admit to deceiving investigators when he was shown security footage contradicting his statement.
That’s OK though. He apologized, saying “I would have never said the things I said in there if I knew there was a video.” All good, then. That’s some world-class remorse.”
“The case seems pretty cut and dried. Danielle Stephanie Warriner, who suffered from COPD came to the hospital due to, unsurprisingly, breathing problems. She was admitted to the hospital, and was sitting in a hallway wearing PPE. She had lowered her mask due to her breathing problems. Guards approached her to enforce a mask mandate. She didn’t comply, again presumably because she had trouble breathing.
The guards donned PPE, demanded she don the mask, and then threw her against the wall almost immediately. While claiming that she struck them first, the video shows that this wasn’t true.
Right after throwing her to a wall, a different guard redirects the camera away from the incident, hiding what was happening. He “panicked,” so turning the camera away clearly didn’t show any consciousness of guilt, right?
Witnesses report the guards threw her to the ground, held her there in exactly the same manner that George Floyd was restrained (knee to the back using body weight). Only she had taken no meth or fentanyl. She was a 125-pound woman with breathing difficulties, as she told them.
They handcuffed her while unconscious and kept her restrained using a knee to the back. She stopped breathing. The guards load her into a wheelchair and eventually notice this fact and call for doctors. She subsequently died from her injuries, having never returned to consciousness.
The guards killed her. A women in respiratory distress in a hospital hallway, there to be treated.
Oh, Canada!
The guards were charged and awaiting trial but the Ontario judge made the unusual decision to toss the case, surprising nearly everybody.
Amanda Rojas-Silva, 42, and Shane Hutley, 35, had been charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence in Warriner’s death — charges they denied, saying they used only the force necessary to gain a hold of her.
Now, those charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial — a decision CBC News has learned the Crown won’t appeal.
That’s despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
The video.
CONTENT WARNING!!!!!
“So there is footage of the guards attacking her unprovoked, used excessive force to restrain her, lied about the incident, a pathologist testified that she would have been alive but for their actions, and the video and facts of the case now being used in training as an example of what not to do.
A coroner’s report would conclude Warriner died from a brain injury resulting from a lack of oxygen “due to restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion,” with her underlying lung disease a possible factor.
“But for her interaction with the Applicants, Ms. Warriner would likely be alive today,” the forensic pathologist testified at the preliminary hearing, according to the Crown.
Lawyers for the accused argued the forensic pathologist lacked the expertise to come to that conclusion.
Still, in quashing the case, Superior Court Justice Sean Dunphy noted, “There is evidence that death could have been the culmination of the factors he described.”
The judge threw out the case. Because COVID hysteria created an environment when such actions are understandable.
Oh, did I say she didn’t have COVID? Nope, she didn’t. She was suffering due to her COPD, not anything transmissible. Of course, in Canada killing off sick people is a positive good, anyway.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is tragic on so many levels.
CONTENT WARNING!!!!!!
I cannot stress that enough. And a further indictment of our garbage press who refuses to report on this.
“TAPES: We Investigated a Suburban LGBTQ Pedophile Ring. Here’s What We Found.”
“This is Part 1 of a four-part investigative series.
Content Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of child sexual abuse. Reader discretion is advised.”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219
“A months-long Townhall investigation reveals disturbing new details about the affluent LGBTQ-activist couple accused of sodomizing their young adopted sons—now ages 9 and 11—and distributing “homemade” child pornography of the sexual abuse. Half a year after the shocking story made national news, Townhall is the only outlet following up on the criminal case in Georgia that has since seen zero headlines written about it. We’ve found that it’s far, far worse than what was first reported.
Not only did the married men allegedly rape the two boys who were adopted through a Christian special-needs adoption agency, they were pimping out their children to nearby pedophiles in Atlanta-area suburbs, Townhall’s follow-up investigation discovered.
Recorded jailhouse calls, a trove of never-before-seen court documents, and testimony from a family member who spoke exclusively with Townhall uncover the extent of the physical and emotional trauma the two elementary school-aged brothers endured as well as the red flags that the state overlooked during the same-sex couple’s “faster than expected” adoption process.
As Townhall reported in August, the suspects were darlings of the LGBTQ media. They were part of an anti-gay hate campaign promoting “#NOH8,” and Out magazine, which holds the nation’s highest circulation among LGBTQ monthly publications, has repeatedly asked them if its website’s Pride page can feature their photos taken at the Atlanta Pride Parade.
Charges
The adoptive fathers, 33-year-old government worker William Dale Zulock Jr. and 35-year-old banker Zachary “Zack” Jacoby Zulock—who was previously accused of raping a child—from Oxford, Georgia, have been indicted by a grand jury on charges of incest, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, felony sexual exploitation of children, and felony prostitution of a minor.
William and Zachary are each facing over nine life sentences. They’ve pleaded not guilty.”
—-
“The indictment also charges the Zulock co-defendants with soliciting two other men, through the use of popular social media platforms, in the Greater Atlanta metropolitan region to “perform an act of prostitution” with their child that suffered physical injuries from being brutally raped. Townhall is the first to publicly identify these two alleged members of a pedophile ring in the heart of the Peach State: 27-year-old Hunter Clay Lawless and 25-year-old Luis Armando Vizcarro-Sanchez, both of Loganville.”
LikeLike