FBI agent Richard Trask was a lead investigator in the case. He was fired after being arrested for assaulting his wife in a drunken rage after a swingers party. Here's video of his arrest (he wasn't charged with DUI even tho he's clearly intoxicated)https://t.co/YwKGsy4bBs
The 2 agents in charge of the primary informant also were removed from the case amid scandal–one was moonlighting and using his position at FBI to gin up business and another was accused of perjury in separate case.
It's a bit much to hear Garland lecture that it's beyond the pale to criticize FBI/DOJ, given the Steele dossier, the Page warrants, and the Mueller whitewash of all of it… The country has every right to be skeptical. https://t.co/X0xR6tTlPI via @WSJ
"The last time we got this level of reassurance about federal law enforcement’s professionalism was at the height of the Russia-collusion hoax."@KimStrasselhttps://t.co/2UMONL1IND
“The new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidance is the agency acknowledging it was wrong in the past to downplay natural immunity and promote unprecedented policies like asymptomatic testing, a California epidemiologist says.
The new guidance, released on Aug. 11, rescinds and alters a number of key recommendations, including treating unvaccinated and vaccinated people differently for many purposes, explicitly stating that people with previous infection have protection against severe illness, and removing six-foot social distancing advice.
“The CDC is admitting it was wrong here, although they won’t put it in those words,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, told The Epoch Times.
“What they’ll say is that, well, ‘the population is more immunized now, has more natural immunity now, and now is the time—the science has changed.’”
But a large percentage of the U.S. population has had natural immunity, or protection from prior infection, Bhattacharya noted, while over 80 percent of the elderly population had protection from severe disease from COVID-19 vaccines, previous infection, or both, since 2021.
“This is two years too late, but it’s a good step,” Bhattacharya added.”
So, we went from "Top Secret" Nuclear documents, to dropping the nuclear part & it just being "Top Secret" documents, to maybe documents that weren't classified/Top Secret at all, in just 3-days. Got it.
I was highly critical of some of the Trump pardons (https://t.co/XWIEZrZaXs) but this move by the Justice Department to circumvent a prior commutation is deeply concerning. https://t.co/GoX1mcHtkQ This is a previously tried individual who received executive clemency…
2 standards, 1 for connected Dems, another for the rest of us.
Hillary Clinton was caught with a private non-secure email server that contained classified information. Did the @FBI raid her home? pic.twitter.com/msnn0kOMSc
So, what crime is Trump guilty of? He’s a Republican. How did Hillary Clinton evade prosecution? She’s a Democrat. It’s just that simple. And in light of that, are we supposed to trust ANYTHING the FBI and DOJ have to say? No. They are leftist operatives.
Wandering Views 
Shady as ……
——
——–
——
——
These are the same biased frauds they’ve sicced on Trump…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ya think?
——-
LikeLiked by 1 person
Funny that….
LikeLiked by 1 person
The CDC knew it was wrong – their intention was to deceive, stoke fear, and worse. Let the arrests begin…
https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-cdc-covid-19-guidance-is-agency-admitting-it-was-wrong-epidemiologist_4662417.html
“The new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidance is the agency acknowledging it was wrong in the past to downplay natural immunity and promote unprecedented policies like asymptomatic testing, a California epidemiologist says.
The new guidance, released on Aug. 11, rescinds and alters a number of key recommendations, including treating unvaccinated and vaccinated people differently for many purposes, explicitly stating that people with previous infection have protection against severe illness, and removing six-foot social distancing advice.
“The CDC is admitting it was wrong here, although they won’t put it in those words,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, told The Epoch Times.
“What they’ll say is that, well, ‘the population is more immunized now, has more natural immunity now, and now is the time—the science has changed.’”
But a large percentage of the U.S. population has had natural immunity, or protection from prior infection, Bhattacharya noted, while over 80 percent of the elderly population had protection from severe disease from COVID-19 vaccines, previous infection, or both, since 2021.
“This is two years too late, but it’s a good step,” Bhattacharya added.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like all good commies….
—–
LikeLike
But Orange Man Bad…..
This will play nicely with the left….. 🙂
LikeLike
“But muh norms” they whine, while shattering norms…..
——
LikeLike
2 standards, 1 for connected Dems, another for the rest of us.
——–
——–
———
LikeLiked by 1 person
But muh narrative….
LikeLike
Tim Scott
LikeLike