What’s interesting in the news today?
As always, Open Thread, so feel free to share with the group. 🙂
____________________________________________________
This first one, I’m troubled by. I’m uncomfortable with the idea of arresting people for not taking their prescribed medications.
From TheNYPost
“The city is making a major push to sweep the streets of dangerous, mentally ill New Yorkers — and has even compiled a most-wanted list, The Post has learned.”
“Those warrants mean that the patients are not wanted for a crime but instead are being sought because they are not getting their court-ordered treatment.”
“In the past, the city Department of Health would ask cops for help finding mentally ill people who aren’t taking their court-mandated meds so they could be taken to clinics. But that only applied to those who had known addresses — and patients who went off the grid were rarely pursued, the sources said.”
____________________________________________________
File this under “Not shocking”.
“Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., indicated that Senate Democrats would renege on their promise to pass the first budget in four years if Republicans did not agree to raise taxes in order to avert the automatic spending cuts mandated by sequestration.
“Senator Murray is working on a budget right now and we hope we can get that done,” Reed said on CNN, referring to Senate Budget Committee chairman Patty Murray, D-Wash. “But we need time. So the sequestration will prevent — preempt us from getting a budget done and other factors.””
____________________________________________________
In a sometimes contentious hearing, economists told the House that despite Dem claims, unemployment benefits hurt employment rates. Extensions of UC would only worsen this. Nancy Pelosi hardest hit by the news.
“Unemployment insurance and other forms of government benefits act as a disincentive to work, economists across the political spectrum agree.
Three different economic experts testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation, and Regulatory Affairs on Thursday afternoon during a heated and contentious hearing. All said that government benefits that kick in during unemployment decrease the economic incentive to pursue work, although they disagreed about the extent of the benefits’ effect.”
“Casey Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago and author of a recent book on the effect that safety net programs have had on employment, argued that the government’s expansion of assistance programs in the wake of the recession actually has made it financially harmful to return to work in some cases.”
____________________________________________________
According to the Chicago teachers union, the problem isn’t their fault. It’s those silly standards. And students agree, so it must be true. 🙄
From TheDailyCaller
“The Chicago Teachers Union urged school administrators nationwide to discontinue the use of standardized tests, deriding them as corporate tools.
The CTU recently released a report arguing that standardized tests are a faulty measure of student achievement. They also advance a pro-corporate agenda, the report said.
“Corporate interests continue to push towards a test‐centered public education system that is clearly harmful to students,” according to the report.”
“The union’s anti-testing push is part of a broader campaign by teachers unions nationwide. Teachers at one Seattle high school recently went on strike, refusing to administer a test that they feared would be used to hold them accountable.”
Oh something’s harming students alright. Try looking in a mirror to find the guilty parties.
____________________________________________________
And if you missed John McCain on Meet the Press, you should check it out. He put David Gregory in his place.
You can watch it here from HotAir
“If I had tried to guess on Saturday which Sunday talk show would get the most contentious, the pairing of John McCain with NBC’s David Gregory on Meet the Press would have come in last on my most-likely list. After all, this clip starts off by discussing the confirmation of Chuck Hagel, which McCain has already said should take place. McCain threw a wrench in the plans last week by supporting a hold/filibuster on his former friend and Senate colleague, though, and Gregory wants to know why. That’s when the fireworks began, as McCain alleged a “massive cover-up” about the White House handling of the Benghazi attack, and Gregory acted as though it was the first time he’s heard of such a claim:”
““I’m asking you, do you care whether four Americans died?” McCain said. “And shouldn’t people be held accountable for the fact that four Americans died?”
“Well, what you said was the cover-up–a cover-up of what?” Gregory asked.
“Of the information concerning the deaths of four brave Americans,” McCain replied. “The information has not been forthcoming. You obviously believe that it has. I know that it hasn’t. And I’ll be glad to send you a list of the questions that have not been answered, including ‘What did the president do and who did he talk to the night of the attack on Benghazi?’”
A least Gregory didn’t use the “What difference does it make” defense.
____________________________________________________