News/Politics 1-12-13

What’s news today?

Bob Costas will be crushed by this news, Ed Schultz as well I’m sure..

From FoxNews

“The NBC Sports Network, a subsidiary of the communications giant Comcast, is  helping to sponsor the largest gun trade show in the country despite anti-gun  rhetoric on the NBC family of television networks, including a controversial  monologue by one of its sports announcers.”

_______________________________________________

This one? Well you would think someone famous like the Senator would have thought to buy their domain name, but no…..

Someone could have a lot of fun with this, especially with her wanting to limit gun rights for us, while packing herself. Seems a tad hypocritical.

From TheDailyCaller

“California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein — a staunch supporter of gun  control — may soon regret not registering her own domain name, since  senatorfeinstein.com will now be run by a firearm parts and accessories store  that will use the site to promote gun rights.

“COMING SOON! Senator Feinstein’s Biggest Fan Page,” reads the title of the  new pro-gun site, senatorfeinstein.com. “Someone didnt  [sic] register their own name… This should be fun. Thats right  Dianne your biggest fan site is going to be run by AresArmor.com…””

A LOT of fun. 🙂

_______________________________________________

I find it interesting that at the same time they’re making a move to restrict gun ownership thru Executive Order, some of the same Senators are encouraging a dictatorship by Presidential decree in other areas as well.

From Politico

“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other top  Democrats are putting new pressure on the White House to circumvent Congress to  boost the nation’s debt ceiling if no bipartisan agreement can be reached.

In a strongly  worded letter to President Barack Obama  obtained by POLITICO, Reid and his leadership team argue that failing to raise  the $16.4 trillion debt ceiling would threaten the full faith and credit of the  United States. Reid and Sens. Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray  asserted that Obama “must make clear that you will never allow our nation’s  economy and reputation to be held hostage.””

Still no budget huh Harry? A total fraud, who once again refuses to fulfill his elected duties.

_______________________________________________

These next 2 are ObamaCare related, so of course, yeah, it’s bad.

From FoxNews

“Obamacare Medical Device Tax:  As of Jan.1, Obamacare imposes a new tax of  2.3 percent on medical device manufacturers, including those who make dental  braces.  The tax is imposed on gross sales — even if the company does not  earn a profit in a given year.  While the tax will be paid to the IRS by  the manufacturer, the tax will be passed along as a higher cost of the product,  ultimately to be borne by the parent buying the braces for their child.   With the cost of braces being as high as $7,625 this new tax could raise the  cost of these braces by $175.”

_______________________________________________

They want you to know they’re watching you evil businesses, so don’t try nothin’ funny.

From CNSNews

“The Internal Revenue Service warned employers in a new regulatory proposal not to come up with clever schemes to avoid  Obamacare’s employer health insurance mandate.

The IRS said it would  soon issue “anti-abuse rules” to discourage employers from taking  advantage of any regulatory loopholes.

“The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware of various structures  being considered under which employers might use temporary staffing  agencies (or other staffing agencies)… to evade application of section  4980H [the employer insurance mandate],” the IRS said in a proposed  regulatory announcement issued December 28.”

And now you know why they needed all those new IRS agents.

________________________________________________

This last one is just maddening.

From NewsBusters

“”Congress could lower individual rates across the board by 44 percent and  come up with the same amount of revenue if it eliminated all tax breaks”  Washington Post reporter Josh Hicks noted in a January 10. Given the ongoing  battles over taxes, spending, and the national debt in Congress, you’d think  this would be worthy of front-page placement in the Post. Editors apparently  disagreed, placing it on the bottom of page A13, today’s edition of The Fed  Page.

“Congress should simplify the tax code to ease the burden on filers, as well  as take a hard look at the myriad tax breaks that cost nearly as much revenue as  the government generates from individual income taxes,” Hicks noted in his lead  paragraph, referring to National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson’s annual  report to Congress. “[T]he existing code of 4 million words imposes a  ‘significant, even unconscionable’ burden of compliance on taxpayers,” Hicks  noted, quoting Olson.”

See? Told ya’.

😡

________________________________________________

9 thoughts on “News/Politics 1-12-13

  1. On the Louie Giglio topic again, this link was posted by Michelle this morning on FB:

    http://betweenthetimes.com/index.php/2013/01/11/the-beheading-of-louie-giglio/

    Again, this isn’t really about the “gay” issue — please.

    Rather it is about the growing chilling effect on the public square and public expression.

    And it also should give those of us in the church pause to consider the time in which we live — and how we are to respond. Easier to fall away from the truth, perhaps, to blur the lines, as the church too often has done in the recent past.

    Like

  2. Donna, We all have that choice: 1. Deny Biblical teaching or hide our beliefs and try to fit in with the US mainstream; or 2. Affirm Biblical teaching and be labeled a bigot and treated as an outcast.

    Like

  3. So the administration says they will “now work to select someone to deliver the benediction” who will “reflect this administration’s vision of inclusion and acceptance for all Americans.” Giglio’s sermon was from 20 years ago, yet President Obama and top administration officials were pro-traditional marriage up until a few years ago (and in Obama’s case, he changed his public stance less than a year ago). Hypocrisy at it’s finest….

    Like

  4. I don’t think Feinstein is being hypocritical. She owns a gun and is in favour of responsible gun ownership. I own a car and am in favour of responsible car ownership.

    I though it was up to the House to pass a budget not the Senate. Obama is not being dictatorial if listens to one chamber and not the other. Both chambers represent the legislative function of gov’t, Obama is the executive. Its quite apparent the Congress is divided and he might have to pick sides.
    I might add that due to gerrymandering a minority of voters manage to capture the majority of the seats in the House. Hence listening to the Senate might be more democratic.

    Its quite common for countries to fine or otherwise force corporations to abide by the spirit of the law instead of evading rules. Australie imposes a wage surcharge payable directly to part time workers if a corporation insists on employing only part-timers to evade mandatory health and vacation benefits.

    Sure Congress can lower taxes if they eliminated all deductions. But if you eliminate the base deduction, anybody not making more than $10,000 will probably lose any incentive to work. Loss of the mortgage deduction will probably bring housing prices down and result in the loss of millions in equity. Loss of child deductions will probably increase poverty among larger families. Deductions are there for good reasons. Some may need to be removed, others lowered and still others raised. Its all about good management.

    Speaking of taxes, since separating from my wife, our combined tax bill has gone down approx $5000 a year. I’m allowed to deduct spousal support. She reports it and pays taxes on it, but at a lower rate along with a base deduction.

    Like

  5. hwesseli

    “Hence listening to the Senate might be more democratic.”

    And just how long has it been since the US Senate passed a budget?
    April 29, 2009

    Like

  6. Even so, HRW, the House sent at least two budgets to the Senate, and Harry Reid didn’t bring them to the floor for a vote. The Senate at least has to agree to any budget the House passes. There is nothing in the Constitution that says which house passes a budget. I think even the President can propose one and the Congress accept or reject it. A few years ago, Obama sent a budget to the Senate and it was unanimously rejected.

    Like

Leave a reply to Tychicus Cancel reply