12 thoughts on “News/Politics 9-9-26”

  2. We have to start working to ensure that these type of over emotional, reality denying individuals with no thought of the 3 victims ever make it on to a jury.

    https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2097489381888066048

    “I’ve watched this probably 100 times at this point.

    This one quote by this one juror is radicalizing me in ways I didn’t know were even possible:

    “He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously k*lled her children…”

    I don’t know where we go from here…”

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  3. “These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

    One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

    Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

    Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

    Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.”

    https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2097507709704614348

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  4. “Matt is not overreacting. He is naming something most people would rather dress up. A jury did not merely get the law wrong. A culture that no longer trembles at the death of a child walked into that room with them.

    That is the fruit of a long catechism. For decades we have been told that the smallest lives are negotiable if an adult is inconvenienced. Abortion taught the lesson first: you can end a child and still speak the language of “empathy”. Once that lie is normal, it is not hard to hear that three children were strangled and immediately start managing the mother’s feelings.

    Scripture will not play along. “So God created man in his own image” (Genesis 1:27, ESV). That image does not shrink because someone is tired, sick, or overwhelmed. “Hands that shed innocent blood” are among the things the Lord hates (Proverbs 6:16–17, ESV). “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20, ESV). J.I. Packer was right: a half-truth posing as the whole truth becomes a complete untruth. Saying she loved them while they lie dead is not compassion. It is a refusal to let love mean anything.

    Feelings are not a law court. Mercy that will not tell the truth is not mercy. It is sentiment with the spine removed, and the people who pay for it are always the ones who cannot speak. God will judge harshly all those who failed to enact justice on behalf of those children…. I pray that the next jury is filled with men & women who have the courage to do what is right…. rather than what is most likely to give them clicks on their social media when the case is resolved.”

    https://x.com/DAILYCONTROVERS/status/2097516500886204781

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  6. “The judge in the Clancy case needs to hold contempt of court hearings for the nurse jurors who reportedly ignored expert witness testimony and brought in external information (who could possibly understand the information without an external background lecture from nurses on the jury), rather than relying on expert witness testimony, and then used that to attempt to bully a juror into agreeing with them.”

    https://x.com/seanmdav/status/2097447696319607170

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  9. I can’t post my true feelings on my idiot Gov., but you can probably guess…

    https://x.com/PAKAG2020/status/2097463269640286297

    “Pennsylvania’s Health Department wants to rewrite the disease rules so investigators can enter homes and schools without a warrant, pull students from class for private interviews without telling parents, and impose “any other disease control measure” they choose.”

    https://x.com/SenatorKimWard/status/2097339175653830697

    “.@GovernorShapiro’s @PAHealthDept has proposed NEW health regulations that would allow DOH to:

    ⚠️Enter homes & offices w/o a warrant

    ⚠️Access private citizens’ health records

    ⚠️Require schools to provide access to students for private conversations regarding contact tracing”

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

  10. I don’t see the problem… 🙄

    https://x.com/Real_RobN/status/2097401237360836811

    “The Federal Reserve CONFIRMS: The only institution on the planet in human history capable of amassing $14.2 trillion is the single greatest racket empire on the planet—the U.S. Congress.

    U.S. NGOs have combined assets totaling $14.2 trillion of your tax money.

    “So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency regarding where that money goes.”

    “The American people deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money, and all information about how that money is used, along with the communications surrounding it, needs to be considered public record. That’s our money, and these NGOs need to start answering to us.””

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  12. Anyone with even a tiny understanding of economics knows you can’t spend your way out if debt.

    https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2097683699424809310

    “Well well well would you look at this…

    Biden’s “Inflation Reduction Act” promised to cut federal healthcare deficits by $129 billion through 2031.

    Guess if it did that?

    The Congressional Budget Office just sent out a memo revealing it actually INCREASED deficits.

    Who could’ve possibly seen this coming

    Biden holdovers in the Trump admin who donate to Democrats are now reportedly undermining Trump’s affordability agenda ahead of the midterms and maintaining FAILED Biden-era policies which costs taxpayers.”

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

Leave a comment