“No one actually dies from MAiD rather they die from cancer or other terminal illnesses. MAiD only allows the patient to control the time of death and limit the unnecessary pain. From what I know and read; its rather hard to obtain MAiD; you must be terminally ill. Thus MAiD does not increase the number of deaths.”
HRW
—
That’s some serious mental gymnastics you got going on there.
If they are ending their life early with medication, unrelated to treating their illness, then it’s not the illness killing them, but the drugs.
To pretend otherwise is a cop out. You’re govt and Dr’s are killing people. That’s a fact.
Iran recently slaughtered tens of thousands of its own people, indiscriminately fired missiles all across the region, wanted to obliterate Israel and significantly harm the US (with a proven willingness to do so), and has behaved in such a way for about 50 years. At what point does a responsible government say ‘Enough!’? Thank God that time has finally come – even a good part of the TDS crowd knows that this is a good thing.
The head of the snake is being cut off – this will weaken Hamas, Hezbollah and all the other radical Islamic terrorist organizations that Iran has funded for so long. We need to keep an eye out for sleeper cells… and enemies in Congress like Omar and Talib.
After 47 years of insults, theatrics and terrorism, the self-appointed supreme abusers are finally getting the beating that they so richly deserve. Please pray that Iranians will now be able to experience true freedom , and that millions upon millions of them will have opportunities to respond to God’s precious Gospel message!
“NDOs indiscriminately signed by Judges Howell and Boasberg on behalf of Jack Smith should be a basis for impeachment inquiries. Did they break the law—Stored Communications Act—by approving NDOs without meeting federally required criteria?
Also, in at least 2 cases, Howell added hefty fines for “contempt” as Twitter and Google tried to appeal gag orders. That was her hammer to prevent tech companies from pursuing lawful options to protect their customers from court gag orders.
Such a tactic included Howell/Smith pursuit of the president’s Twitter data—which 4 DC appellate court judges later denounced as an “unprecedented” breach of executive privilege.
Boasberg, via a court spox, claimed he wasn’t aware NDOs he signed targeted members of Congress. Ok, prove it.
Once again, it’s beyond me how these judges in particular continue to escape accountability for their abusive and perhaps unlawful conduct. Subpoena their records, hold hearings, force them to testify so the country can see what oily scoundrels they are—and then proceed with impeachment.
How many more stories like this do we have to read and just go 🤷🏼♀️”
“Abigail Spanberger’s office has released a statement saying they STILL will not honor an ICE detainer against the illegal alien with 30 prior arrests who murdered 41-year-old Stephanie Minter in Fairfax last week.
Instead, they demand that ICE receive a signed judicial warrant before they’ll turn him over to the feds. The problem with that is ICE can only get a judicial warrant if an illegal alien is being investigated for or commits a federal crime.
This means that Abigail Spanberger is literally giving illegal aliens permission to commit more violent crimes against Virginians before she will work with the feds to deport them.”
“Massie is funded by Islamists like the Mahrouq family (the main dude is a Palestinian and they also fund the Democrat Squad members).
Massie is 79% funded by Democrats and Islamists.
Massie accepted a Soros award in December with a progressive Democrat from an IRGC lobbyist from Iran (Keith Ellison and Kamala Harris also received this award in the past).
Tychicus — I seemed to have mixed up a metaphor or used it twice.
Wag the Dog orginally meant the more important entity (the dog) being controlled or led by a less important one (the tail). The Rubio quote from yesterday seems to indicate that Israel is indeed the tail that is wagging the dog.
In a more modern version of the metaphor, Wag the Dog means to use the military as a diversion from domestic scandals. This version of the metaphor comes from the movie. In this version, attacking Iran is the diversion from the Epstein files.
Interestingly, you will see the two uses combined as when Iran has tweeted it is defending itself from the Epstein alliance.
I’m still confused as to the end game or goal. I think we have learned in the last years that these types of operations need an end game before they start
Yes, the Iranian regime has a horrible human rights record. Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan also had horrible human rights records but I think we would now agree that all three interventions by the US or the West in general had serious errors and mistakes, if not the entire war was an error. Saudi Arabia and China have horrible human rights records but nobody is advocating an invasion there. Human rights is not enough rationale to invade. (then there’s Israel’s behaviour towards the Palestinians)
I’ve heard/read that the Trump admin wants to follow the Venezuela example — cut off the head and let Iran allow for succession but apparently the people they had in mind died in the bombing along with the Ayatollah. Oops. The messaging from the administration is confused — duration, ground troops, etc — all have been answered differently.
Meanwhile, people are dying, equipment is being wasted, and the price of oil has gone up 20% in one month.
“@SecRubio: “Let me explain to you guys this in simple English, ok? Iran is run by lunatics — religious fanatic lunatics. They have an ambition to have nuclear weapons. They intend to develop those nuclear weapons behind a program of missiles and drones and terrorism that the world will not be able to touch them for fear of those things.
And this is the weakest they’ve ever been. Now is the time to go after them. The President made the decision to go after them, take away their missiles, take away their navy, take away their drones, take away their ability to make those things, so that they can never have a nuclear weapon…
That’s why the President made this decision. It was the right decision — and the world will be a safer place when these radical clerics no longer have access to these weapons. You see how they’re using them now. Imagine how they would use them a year from now if they had more of these.””
So its WMD all over again? That worked out well before. Bibi has been claiming Iran will have nuclear weapons in a short time for the last 33 years. He’s like the boy who cried wolf yet the US still pays attention despite intelligence not backing up Bibi’s claim.
Religious fanatic lunatics? There are a lot of people/regimes in this world who might fit that description. Pakistan who has nuclear weapons considers itself an Islamic state and quite conservative if not fanatical. Of course there’s the Taliban — hopefully nobody is suggesting taking on those religious lunatics. Then there’s the Saudis which follow the fanatical Wahhabi version of Islam. But they are allies in this mess — seems to be a tolerance for religious nuts except one. And not to focus I’ll mention the Russian Orthodox priests calling the Ukraine war a holy war or crusade. And now you have US commanders telling their soldiers that bombing Iran is Trump acting out God’s divine plan for the end of days. There’s lunatics everywhere — and for the most part we better off tolerating rather than poking the bear.
Is the Iranian regime weak? Yes, but a foreign invasion usually unites a country. Will bombing help the regime or will it help to knock it down? The Trump admin isn’t too sure as initially they said they wanted to follow the Venezuelan model; but they keep killing possible successors. And if the regime collapses, and there’s no successor — who will fix it, will this lead to chaos as Kurds, Azeris, Arabs and Balochs become assertive? Iraq, Syria and Libya still don’t have strong central governments and it’s been over a decade. Perhaps regime change and regime building isn’t a good idea right now.
Rubio was honest yesterday — they knew what Israel wanted and by getting ahead of Israel, they could assert some measure of control. But it’s still Israel (and the Saudis) pushing American policy.
“No one actually dies from MAiD rather they die from cancer or other terminal illnesses. MAiD only allows the patient to control the time of death and limit the unnecessary pain. From what I know and read; its rather hard to obtain MAiD; you must be terminally ill. Thus MAiD does not increase the number of deaths.”
HRW
—
That’s some serious mental gymnastics you got going on there.
If they are ending their life early with medication, unrelated to treating their illness, then it’s not the illness killing them, but the drugs.
To pretend otherwise is a cop out. You’re govt and Dr’s are killing people. That’s a fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Iran recently slaughtered tens of thousands of its own people, indiscriminately fired missiles all across the region, wanted to obliterate Israel and significantly harm the US (with a proven willingness to do so), and has behaved in such a way for about 50 years. At what point does a responsible government say ‘Enough!’? Thank God that time has finally come – even a good part of the TDS crowd knows that this is a good thing.
The head of the snake is being cut off – this will weaken Hamas, Hezbollah and all the other radical Islamic terrorist organizations that Iran has funded for so long. We need to keep an eye out for sleeper cells… and enemies in Congress like Omar and Talib.
After 47 years of insults, theatrics and terrorism, the self-appointed supreme abusers are finally getting the beating that they so richly deserve. Please pray that Iranians will now be able to experience true freedom , and that millions upon millions of them will have opportunities to respond to God’s precious Gospel message!
LikeLiked by 1 person
But muh norms, they whined….
And the #USELESSGOP does nothing.
https://x.com/i/status/2028844280823914882
“NDOs indiscriminately signed by Judges Howell and Boasberg on behalf of Jack Smith should be a basis for impeachment inquiries. Did they break the law—Stored Communications Act—by approving NDOs without meeting federally required criteria?
Also, in at least 2 cases, Howell added hefty fines for “contempt” as Twitter and Google tried to appeal gag orders. That was her hammer to prevent tech companies from pursuing lawful options to protect their customers from court gag orders.
Such a tactic included Howell/Smith pursuit of the president’s Twitter data—which 4 DC appellate court judges later denounced as an “unprecedented” breach of executive privilege.
Boasberg, via a court spox, claimed he wasn’t aware NDOs he signed targeted members of Congress. Ok, prove it.
Once again, it’s beyond me how these judges in particular continue to escape accountability for their abusive and perhaps unlawful conduct. Subpoena their records, hold hearings, force them to testify so the country can see what oily scoundrels they are—and then proceed with impeachment.
How many more stories like this do we have to read and just go 🤷🏼♀️”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Moderate…?
Sure, for a CIA plant, maybe…
https://x.com/i/status/2028647702922137894
“Abigail Spanberger’s office has released a statement saying they STILL will not honor an ICE detainer against the illegal alien with 30 prior arrests who murdered 41-year-old Stephanie Minter in Fairfax last week.
Instead, they demand that ICE receive a signed judicial warrant before they’ll turn him over to the feds. The problem with that is ICE can only get a judicial warrant if an illegal alien is being investigated for or commits a federal crime.
This means that Abigail Spanberger is literally giving illegal aliens permission to commit more violent crimes against Virginians before she will work with the feds to deport them.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s such a principled, honest, conservative.
https://x.com/i/status/2028512318556885030
“Massie is funded by Islamists like the Mahrouq family (the main dude is a Palestinian and they also fund the Democrat Squad members).
Massie is 79% funded by Democrats and Islamists.
Massie accepted a Soros award in December with a progressive Democrat from an IRGC lobbyist from Iran (Keith Ellison and Kamala Harris also received this award in the past).
Massie is the epitome of America last.”
—-
“vast amounts of money 🤡👇”
https://x.com/i/status/2028506362347507857
And now you know why he never supports Trump or the reasonable R position.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A year plus in, and Rs in the Senate refuse to do their damned jobs.
https://x.com/i/status/2028655887544619294
“Trump can’t appoint prosecutors in Democrat states due to the blue slip system, which gives a Senator veto power.
Senate Leadership won’t put the Senate in recess. Trump could make recess appointments regardless of the blue slip system.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Iranian regime wanted to elect a new Ayatollah.
There were…. problems….
https://x.com/i/status/2028841565121032633
“As best as I can explain it, they bombed the Ayatollah Conclave, which means they’re now short quite a few Ayatollah candidates”
—
https://x.com/i/status/2028836647849103620
“Iran’s Assembly of Experts building in Qom has been struck by airstrikes
The Assembly of Experts is a council of about 90 senior clerics that is tasked with electing Iran’s new Supreme Leader.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tychicus — I seemed to have mixed up a metaphor or used it twice.
Wag the Dog orginally meant the more important entity (the dog) being controlled or led by a less important one (the tail). The Rubio quote from yesterday seems to indicate that Israel is indeed the tail that is wagging the dog.
In a more modern version of the metaphor, Wag the Dog means to use the military as a diversion from domestic scandals. This version of the metaphor comes from the movie. In this version, attacking Iran is the diversion from the Epstein files.
Interestingly, you will see the two uses combined as when Iran has tweeted it is defending itself from the Epstein alliance.
hrw
LikeLike
If you heard SoS Rubio today, he clearly said that “the dog” is the one doing the controlling (and leading).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m still confused as to the end game or goal. I think we have learned in the last years that these types of operations need an end game before they start
Yes, the Iranian regime has a horrible human rights record. Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan also had horrible human rights records but I think we would now agree that all three interventions by the US or the West in general had serious errors and mistakes, if not the entire war was an error. Saudi Arabia and China have horrible human rights records but nobody is advocating an invasion there. Human rights is not enough rationale to invade. (then there’s Israel’s behaviour towards the Palestinians)
I’ve heard/read that the Trump admin wants to follow the Venezuela example — cut off the head and let Iran allow for succession but apparently the people they had in mind died in the bombing along with the Ayatollah. Oops. The messaging from the administration is confused — duration, ground troops, etc — all have been answered differently.
Meanwhile, people are dying, equipment is being wasted, and the price of oil has gone up 20% in one month.
hrw
LikeLike
What part is the lying media confused about here?
https://x.com/i/status/2028937493777727815
“@SecRubio: “Let me explain to you guys this in simple English, ok? Iran is run by lunatics — religious fanatic lunatics. They have an ambition to have nuclear weapons. They intend to develop those nuclear weapons behind a program of missiles and drones and terrorism that the world will not be able to touch them for fear of those things.
And this is the weakest they’ve ever been. Now is the time to go after them. The President made the decision to go after them, take away their missiles, take away their navy, take away their drones, take away their ability to make those things, so that they can never have a nuclear weapon…
That’s why the President made this decision. It was the right decision — and the world will be a safer place when these radical clerics no longer have access to these weapons. You see how they’re using them now. Imagine how they would use them a year from now if they had more of these.””
LikeLiked by 1 person
So its WMD all over again? That worked out well before. Bibi has been claiming Iran will have nuclear weapons in a short time for the last 33 years. He’s like the boy who cried wolf yet the US still pays attention despite intelligence not backing up Bibi’s claim.
Religious fanatic lunatics? There are a lot of people/regimes in this world who might fit that description. Pakistan who has nuclear weapons considers itself an Islamic state and quite conservative if not fanatical. Of course there’s the Taliban — hopefully nobody is suggesting taking on those religious lunatics. Then there’s the Saudis which follow the fanatical Wahhabi version of Islam. But they are allies in this mess — seems to be a tolerance for religious nuts except one. And not to focus I’ll mention the Russian Orthodox priests calling the Ukraine war a holy war or crusade. And now you have US commanders telling their soldiers that bombing Iran is Trump acting out God’s divine plan for the end of days. There’s lunatics everywhere — and for the most part we better off tolerating rather than poking the bear.
Is the Iranian regime weak? Yes, but a foreign invasion usually unites a country. Will bombing help the regime or will it help to knock it down? The Trump admin isn’t too sure as initially they said they wanted to follow the Venezuelan model; but they keep killing possible successors. And if the regime collapses, and there’s no successor — who will fix it, will this lead to chaos as Kurds, Azeris, Arabs and Balochs become assertive? Iraq, Syria and Libya still don’t have strong central governments and it’s been over a decade. Perhaps regime change and regime building isn’t a good idea right now.
Rubio was honest yesterday — they knew what Israel wanted and by getting ahead of Israel, they could assert some measure of control. But it’s still Israel (and the Saudis) pushing American policy.
hrw
LikeLike