10 thoughts on “News/Politics 5-23-24

  1. Biden’s Banana Republic.

    https://x.com/wendyp4545/status/1793369864910119140?t=6_JdYW9bulsX3n8lN_OWTQ&s=19

    “Imagine being raided by the ATF who didn’t have confirmation that a crime had been committed by a man in which they attempted to raid several times but he wasn’t home, who purposely waited for him to be in the home, but they didn’t need him to be home and within seconds of the door opening at his home, the ATF shot the homeowner dead.

    We call that a targeted hit. Nothing was ever found in this mans home. There was no crime”

    Liked by 1 person

  2. ~~~ “The FBI to put out a statement today saying this is standard procedure, that the FBI always has lethal force,” she said. “They showed up to Mar-a-Lago knowing Donald Trump wasn’t there. They didn’t show up at six o’clock in the morning. They didn’t come with the lights flashing and the guns blazing. It was a very chill scene for a scene where they were showing up to find classified documents.”

    Honig, a former federal prosecutor, scoffed at the charge and explained that the Mar-a-Lago search warrant was basically standard fare:

    This is ridiculous. There’s nothing to see here. And I looked even at what specifically they’re talking about. If you look at the search warrant documentation, there is a standard form. It’s page 11 of the sheet and it gives the FBI and the generally-acknowledged standard for use of lethal force. It says essentially, you can only fire your weapon, you can only use lethal force if there is imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury to somebody else. If you see somebody else about to shoot somebody, about the stab somebody. It is, if anything, a very tight limit on when you can use lethal force. almost never.

    It appears in every search warrant, every operational plan, every ops plan. There is nothing to this. The notion that there’s something dangerous, wrong, I’m hesitant to even dignify the assassination talk by even mentioning it, but completely out of line.” ~~~

    https://www.mediaite.com/trump/elie-honig-pillories-ridiculous-marjorie-taylor-greene-for-wild-claim-that-biden-tried-to-kill-trump/

    Like

  3. Nikki Haley probably only said what she did because it was expected of her as a fellow Republican. With all that she has said about him in the past, I doubt she would want to be vice-president under Trump.

    Like

  4. Kizzie, that’s my sense as well — that she purposely chose to burn that bridge (quite publicly) a long time ago and she is fine with that.

    Voting for Biden is a non-starter for any committed conservative. With no other alternative, she’s making a call many are having to make — but because she’s a former candidate and a prominent party member, it’s somewhat incumbent upon her to make a public statement on the matter.

    She doesn’t have the luxury of keeping her choice to herself.

    • dj

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Ok Kizzie, then where is the Biden warrant that would show the same ?

    Why not release it to prove it? Or any other example for that matter?

    Taking the word of the FBI and some dem appointed prosecutor isn’t proof. Show the work.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.