Parents worried that the pervs are targeting kids are once again proven correct. And this is in cities all over the US.
CONTENT WARNING!!!!!!
SHOCKING: watch as fully naked adults ride around the Seattle pride parade and expose themselves to the children in the crowds. This is the same group that says they’re not coming after children.
Would you allow your kids to attend an even like this?
The San Francisco Pride Parade is like a parody of a decadent civilization – celebrating one last bacchanal before the lights go out. I am documenting it in this thread🧵
If this is the last time you hear from me, please assume I was smited by g*d just for showing up to observe pic.twitter.com/C59MpSzpOp
IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley testified that US Atty in charge of Hunter investigation, David Weiss, said he wanted to bring charges in DC but was denied. Many of you balked. Didn't happen! No way Shapley could know that! Now, here's some more from Shapley: pic.twitter.com/m2Z8nUqEeU
Statement from IRS Agent Gary Shapley's legal team: "In an October 7, 2022, meeting at the Delaware U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. Attorney David Weiss told six witnesses he did not have authority to charge in other districts and had thus requested special counsel status. Those six… pic.twitter.com/hMKhCQfDo6
“When it comes to debating conspiracy theorists, there is a simple but enduring rule—don’t.
The entire exercise is pointless because no matter how many facts you bring to the table—or no matter how much debunking you’re able to do—there are always new tangents and new questions raised. Arguing with a conspiracy theorist is like trying to untangle a ball of yarn that has no end.
That brings us to Democratic presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist devotee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
RFK Jr. Was Always a Crackpot, He Just Switched Political Tribes
In recent weeks, RFK Jr., who, according to recent polls, is attracting between 10-20 percent of Democratic voters, has become a focus of political media. There have been splashy profiles in the Washington Post and Time magazine; political analysis about his surprising poll numbers from The New York Times; and countless interviews with non-traditional news outlets, including a three-hour sit-down with Joe Rogan, the country’s most listened-to podcaster.
A growing number of billionaire tech bros, like Twitter owner Elon Musk, are praising Kennedy’s run. And according to a recent report from Brandy Zadrozny at NBC News, so many reporters are now covering Kennedy’s campaign there was not room for her to accompany the candidate to official events.
But, in reality, we should be paying less, not more attention, to Kennedy Jr. He has no chance of winning the Democratic nomination and he is not so much running for president as he is seeking a platform for his bevy of conspiracy theories that, in the most charitable telling, are misguided ramblings and, from a darker perspective, risk undermining public health and putting lives in danger.
The mainstream media is not required to give Kennedy Jr. a platform or cover his campaign, and they shouldn’t. The benefits of covering his quixotic bid for the White House are more than offset by the damage he can do by pushing his deranged conspiracy theories on an unsuspecting public.
What separates Kennedy Jr. from your garden-variety, conspiracy theorist dabblers is that he doesn’t just believe one of them—he appears to embrace them all.”
—-
Oh noooos!!!!!! 😳😨😳😨
—–
The attacks will come from both sides of the media landscape.
“For a candidate with no chance, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is drawing a lot of media attention. Since the 69-year-old scion announced his candidacy on April 19, he has been dismissed and derided in the press, while consistently pulling about 20% support in Democratic primary polls.
A New York Times news article described Mr. Kennedy as “a longtime amplifier and propagator of baseless theories, beginning nearly two decades ago with his skepticism about the result of the 2004 presidential election as well as common childhood vaccines,” and claimed “his audience for such misinformation ballooned during the coronavirus pandemic.”
Much of this is true. Yet some of Mr. Kennedy’s “baseless” theories—say, that Covid lockdowns harmed lower-income Americans while enriching billionaires like Jeff Bezos—have a kernel of truth. They resonate with those who distrust what he calls a “corrupt merger of state and corporate power.”
To describe Mr. Kennedy’s political views as heterodox is an understatement. He opposes flu and Covid vaccines, pharmaceutical companies, lockdowns, the administrative state, fossil fuels, global elites, gun restrictions, social-media censorship and U.S. assistance to Ukraine. He wants to “seal” the Mexican border permanently.
Polls show Mr. Kennedy draws more support from Republicans and independents than from Democrats. According to a recent Quinnipiac poll, voters view him more favorably than not. The same isn’t true of other presidential contenders including Mr. Biden, Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Mike Pence and Nikki Haley. The Democratic dark horse’s strong show of support no doubt owes partially to his name recognition and to the public’s unfamiliarity with some of his positions.
On the other hand, it’s also possible that some of his iconoclastic views appeal to the disaffected voters who form Mr. Trump’s base. In the aforementioned poll, Mr. Kennedy has a larger favorability margin than Mr. Trump among whites without college degrees. Perhaps they see Mr. Kennedy as a fighter for the common man against the “man” just as they once thought of the former president. Attempts by liberals to silence and discredit Mr. Kennedy merely enhance his appeal.
Last week YouTube removed his 95-minute interview with Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. In a bit of irony, Mr. Peterson had noted in the interview that “YouTube has left me alone. It’s quite surprising.” After the video went viral, the site pulled it down citing its “vaccine misinformation policy.”
Yet it wasn’t Mr. Kennedy’s well-worn criticisms of vaccines or his calling pharmaceutical companies a “criminal enterprise” that racked up clicks. It was his claim that chemicals in the water supply—specifically the herbicide atrazine—are driving an increase in “sexual dysphoria” that is causing boys to believe they are girls. “They’re swimming through a soup of toxic chemicals today, and many of those are endocrine disruptors,” Mr. Kennedy claimed.
Journalists were quick to “fact check” him, noting that the frog study he cited as evidence wasn’t directly applicable to humans. That’s correct—but it was unusual to see the press shower a dubious environmental claim with appropriate skepticism. All too often they parrot such questionable assertions, including the notion that chemicals disrupt hormones.
Liberals deride Mr. Kennedy for his antivaccine activism, but it flows from the same fanatical font as the environmental zealotry they too have embraced. No doubt the mainstream press would deny the similarity, but Mr. Kennedy affirms it. In interviews he has traced his vaccine activism to his work on mercury pollution from coal plants, which he claims based on thin evidence cause brain damage and cancer. He also claims a tenuous link between thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines, and childhood autism.
Most of his claims about vaccine dangers aren’t any kookier than those that he and his green allies have made about fossil fuels. Both are based on flawed research and ignore countervailing evidence. But only Mr. Kennedy’s vaccine claims are fact-checked and suppressed. Americans have no doubt picked up on this disparate treatment.
Progressive beliefs, no matter how preposterous, are beyond question. Views that cut against the grain, even those that are scientifically well-founded, are silenced and labeled as “misinformation.” Justified criticisms of Covid lockdowns have been peremptorily dismissed as “baseless” in much the same way as Mr. Kennedy’s questionable vaccine claims.”
NYC’s idiotic Soros bought DA and his policies caused this. Intervene to stop the attack, you’ll be the one they charge. Call it “The Daniel Perry Effect.”
This is just his chickens coming home to roost.
Chilling video footage obtained by The Post captures a Manhattan subway-slash victim screaming in agony after the random attack — and pleading for help as other riders apparently just go about their business. pic.twitter.com/yFn9iVDabs
@ManhattanDA@ChrisMarteNYC & others in the far left caucus take notice of the Daniel Penny effect. This is what happens when everyday people are vilified for trying to help others.
The bystanders don’t intervene because they could end up in jail, publicly whipped by “leaders.” https://t.co/L49LW2IWR2
Predictable….when exposed just whine and deflect…I am stunned he stopped short of calling his critics terrorists!!!
🔥 Late last week, the U.S.’s evil grandmother, Merrick Garland, mounted the official podium and whined about all the people criticizing the Department of Justice. He admitted the DOJ’s critics claim the agency is biased, corrupted, and weaponized are wrong. But, to prove just how neutral, unbiased and not one-weaponized the DOJ is, Garland labeled all the people who criticized the agency as dangerous underminers of democracy:
“Some have chosen to attack the integrity of the Justice Department by claiming that we do not treat cases alike. This constitutes an attack on an institution that is essential to American democracy… Nothing could be further from the truth.”
“As Predicted: Democrats and Media Waste No Time Going After Third Party Election Threats
“No Labels, the political outfit preparing to run a ‘unity’ ticket in 2024 that Democratic strategists and Never-Trump Republican operatives fear will siphon votes from President Joe Biden, is what’s known as a dark-money group.”
“Less than two days ago, I cited a new poll from Emerson College which shows that a third party candidate would pose a serious political threat to Joe Biden.
I closed by saying that we should expect Democrats and the media to aggressively go after any third party threats. I just didn’t expect it to happen this fast.”
I've been saying for days that we should expect Democrats and the media to go nuclear on any possible third party runs. And away we go… pic.twitter.com/3cTNNks5ct
No Labels Exposed: Here’s a List of Donors Funding Its Effort To Disrupt the 2024 Race
No Labels, the political outfit preparing to run a “unity” ticket in 2024 that Democratic strategists and Never-Trump Republican operatives fear will siphon votes from President Joe Biden, is what’s known as a dark-money group. Unlike political parties, political action committees, and House, Senate, and presidential candidates, it is not required to reveal who is funding it.
And No Labels, which says it intends to raise $70 million to possibly place a third-party candidate on the presidential ballot next year, refuses to disclose who is financing this project. But Mother Jones has obtained a list of 36 wealthy contributors and corporate high-rollers who last year wrote big checks to support No Labels’ effort to win 2024 ballot lines in states across the nation.
This roster includes past and present chief executives of major companies, including Loews Corporation (a vast conglomerate), Fluor (an engineering and construction giant), Abry Partners (a private equity firm), SailPoint (a tech firm), and Fortress Investment Group.
Got that? Dark, corporate money. How dare they!
In case you missed the point, here’s Politico:
No Labels declines to reveal just who is funding its third party bid
No Labels’ bid to run a third party presidential candidate in 2024 has sparked a number of questions about political motivations. Chief among them: Who, exactly, is paying for this thing?
The centrist group consists of a constellation of entities, some of which disclose donor names. But the main one is a nonprofit which, unlike political parties, does not have to reveal the names of its funders. And in an interview with POLITICO, its CEO, Nancy Jacobson, declined to do so, saying simply that it was a “mixed” pool of individual contributors including “people that want to help our country.”…
No Labels’ refusal to reveal donor identities has worsened tensions in Washington, where a smattering of Democratic and anti-Donald Trump conservatives have accused the group of potentially kneecapping President Biden’s reelection.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. used to be a hero on the left. Now, Rolling Stone Magazine wants you to know he is basically an ultra-MAGA figure who is totally aligned with Marjorie Taylor Greene:
Pro-RFK Jr. Super PAC Has Deep Ties to Marjorie Taylor Greene, George Santos”
5% of American adults under 30 “identify” as trans. 5 years ago, 0.6% of 18-29 year olds said they were trans. That’s not “visibility.” This is a social contagion of a mental health epidemic. pic.twitter.com/SOFpQSDrpC
“Planned Parenthood in Canada is upset after the Saskatchewan education minister, Dustin Duncan, suspended them from teaching in schools in the province. It emerged that Planned Parenthood brought a sexually graphic trivia game to a school in Lumsden, Sask. on June 19 that was distributed to children as a resource following a sex education presentation.
The “Using sex: From A–Z Cards” game features cartoon characters and text explaining various sex acts and fetishes, including fecal fetishes and sucking….”
—–
Note:
The description gets very foul after that so I won’t post it. See for yourself, but be warned.
As vile as it is, this is what they’re “teaching” kids.
“We got a taste of what a real “armed insurrection” looks like this weekend. No Viking garb or selfie-taking grandmas in sight.
And it had the world on edge.
The Russian mercenary force Wagner Group, a potent weapon in Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine, suddenly turned on Putin this Friday. Led by Yevgeny Prigozhin, the Wagner Group crossed into Russia, taking crucial military sites, taking down Russian helicopters, and began advancing toward Moscow. The military prepared to block the rebellion. There were even reports Putin had fled the capital.
The move was called the greatest threat to Putin since he took power.
What Happened
Prigozhin has been bitterly dissatisfied with how Russia’s military is conducting the war, including the lack of ammunition being provided his troops. The New York Times reports Prigozhin loathes Defense Minister Sergei K. Shoigu and Gen. Valery Gerasimov, the chief of the general staff of the Russian armed forces, and the feeling is mutual. The tug-and-pull highlights the disarray with the Russian military.
Prigozhin claimed he was forced to act after the Russian military attacked one of his camps Friday, a claim Russia denies. Indeed, U.S. has intelligence suggesting Wagner Group was building up its forces along the Russian border long before Friday’s attack. According to the New York Times, the U.S. kept quiet about it, not wanting to be seen as helping Putin in any way.”
—
“The Nature of the Deal
Prigozhin agreed to halt his advance, what Putin had earlier called a “path to treason.” His forces that did not take part will be offered contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defense, something Prigozhin previously rejected.
He and his forces that did take part will not face any charges for their insurrection. Yes, he invades Russia and gets less heat than had he walked into the U.S. Capitol January 6.”
“It cannot be overstated: this incident ruined this kid’s life. And it was all a lie. The wheels of justice spin slowly, which applies to all parties involved—guilty and innocent. We’ve all read stories of being exonerated for crimes they never committed years, even decades, after they were wrongly convicted. And for the worst of society, the true cancers, like murderers, rapists, and child abusers, it also takes time to lock them up. For those on death row, that wait is also exceedingly long. In some cases, the state moves so slowly in disposing of our most depraved convicts that they live to see their respective state legislatures abolish capital punishment. Yet, throughout it all, those who are wrongfully accused are powerless to see their life and reputations burned to ash. That’s exactly what happened to former Buffalo Bills’ punter Matt Araiza.
Selected in the sixth round of the 2022 NFL draft, Araiza seemed groomed to become the franchise’s long-term answer at the position. Then came the allegation that he was involved in a gang rape while attending San Diego State. Already declared guilty by the court of public opinion and those who manage the Bills’ public image, Araiza was cut from the team before the start of the official season that year .”
—-
“In the ‘Me Too’ era, erring on caution instead of verifying the facts is the default position. August 27, 2022, was when Araiza’s short-lived NFL career ended. Months later, the truth was revealed: Araiza was innocent, not even present when the alleged rape occurred. And it’s not just him; the two other students were also cleared in the investigation (via ESPN):”
Prosecutors said Matt Araiza was not present when an alleged gang rape of a minor occurred at an Oct 2021 party, according to witness testimony that prompted the San Diego DA to not press criminal charges against the former Bills punter, via @agetzenberg.https://t.co/E3cLK4Vtql
“He didn’t do it. It’s the dark side of the ‘Me Too’ era: women can lie about rape. They’re human, just as susceptible to greed, manipulation, deceit, and ruthlessness as the rest of us. The adage that such a damning allegation would never be brought up unless the supposed victim was telling the truth doesn’t hold up anymore with the proliferation of social media. These allegations receive immense attention, especially concerning the media industry and professional sports. Being a victim is also profitable for those who play this sick, twisted game at the expense of actual rape victims. And because this crime has been put on a pedestal, it makes the fabricated sexual assaults more devastating regarding obtaining justice for real victims.
The mantra was ‘believe all women,’ which quickly died when many liberal men started getting caught up in the mayhem. Then, some decided to take this ‘Me too’ card for a spin, claiming that mere bad dates were sexual assaults. Comedian Aziz Ansari almost had his career destroyed over such spurious claims.
And let’s not forget the 2014 gang rape of “Jackie” at the University of Virginia that never happened, which led to Rolling Stone and its reporters, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, getting sued and convicted of libel over their piece. Erdely was slapped with a $2 million judgment personally. The piece is an example of what not to do regarding investigative journalism, earning top honors for failing to do the basics from Columbia Journalism Review and Poynter Institute that year. You knew trouble was brewing when T. Rees Shapiro, a then-education reporter for The Washington Post, was able to dissect and easily debunk most of the piece’s core claims in a few articles. When the jury found the magazine guilty of libel in 2016, the publication’s lawyer, Scott Sexton, did not mince words regarding the massive failure we were all witnesses to, saying that the destruction of Erdely’s journalism career was just the tip of the iceberg.
“The magazine’s editorial staff was no match for Jackie…she deceived us, and we do know it was purposeful,” he said.
It sounds like Mr. Araiza was a victim of another woman who was good at telling fantastic tales. The 2006 Duke Lacrosse team knows that all too well, victims of a fake rape allegation compounded by a rogue local prosecutor eager to sacrifice these young men’s lives to get re-elected.”
But Orange Man Bad, so the rules have been changed.
Fact check: This was the Justice Department's and National Archives' legal position prior to Trump. See Clinton "sock drawer" case, which @JudicialWatch litigated. https://t.co/0oWaugR8J6
“For nearly two and a half centuries, the United States justice system has provided a legal framework for the most prosperous and successful society the planet has ever seen. Americans have not yet begun to process the true costs of sacrificing the integrity of that system to achieve short term political ends.
The judicial system in the United States is composed of a mixture of democratic elements in the form of elected state prosecutors and ordinary juries, appointed or elected judges, and a professional police force. Thanks to this structure, it managed to maintain the two elements essential to the provision of justice in an impressive balance: sufficient independence to allow it to defy temporary public sentiment in order to uphold the law, but enough public legitimacy to ensure those decisions were respected and the democratic branches of government did not encroach on the powers of the judiciary.
Every work of political theory at the time of the founding, and the vast majority of what has been produced since, suggests this system should not have worked. Requiring jury trials for criminal cases should have turned them into lynch mobs, as it sometimes did in the Jim Crow South. Electing judges or allowing elected politicians to appoint them would ensure they would be susceptible to those momentary passions of the people. The election of prosecutors would produce a politized judicial system in which local strongmen turned the law against political rivals, carving out one-party dictatorships. The act of allowing jury trials in civil cases was madness itself.
The irony is that with some exceptions, including the tragedy of the Jim Crow South, most of these fears went unrealized.
The reason was the American people themselves. All of the tools of abuse were provided to them. Had they chosen, they could have used the judicial system to persecute their enemies and protect their friends. Carved out homogenous enclaves. Waged economic warfare against unfavored companies. Thrown out any judge who made an unpopular ruling, and targeted jurors who let off unpopular but innocent defendants. But by and large, they did not.
Prosecutorial and judicial elections existed, but until recently they often went uncontested. Individuals could remain in office for decades, only being challenged and defeated when they were either incapable of fulfilling their duties due to age or had ceased to fulfill them due to corruption.
This was reflected in the fact that most prosecutorial elections were non-partisan, and the trend toward partisan elections, pushed by both parties in regions where they are strong, has undermined the system in different ways.
Nonetheless, what made the system work was the commitment of the political class to make it work. In some ways, there was a de facto truce in which Democrats and Republicans agreed that when it came to issues involving the other party, they would “recuse” themselves.
This abstention required two things. First, it required both sides to mutually agree to play by the rules. If one side refrained from prosecuting Hillary Clinton or her senior advisors for mishandling their finances or classified materials, the other should respond in kind.
Second, it required an approach akin to the line about Caesar’s wife when it came to political cases. Upon returning to Rome, Caesar learned his wife had attended a party where indecent behavior took place. Upon being informed he was divorcing her, she challenged him as to why. No one had accused her of doing anything inappropriate herself. His response was simple: “Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion.”
If retaining the independence and integrity of the legal system required both sides to agree to play by the rules, then it furthermore required both sides to believe the other was playing by them.
It may well be that the Watergate, Iran-Contra, and Whitewater investigations were seeking real crimes and were conducted by professional figures, but their consequences could not help but promote partisan ends: the targeting of a president.
Therefore, it was not a sufficient defense for Ken Starr in the 1990s or those investigating Hunter Biden today to merely insist they are acting within professional norms. They need to convince the country they are doing so.
That is where the true judicial failure has occurred over the last few weeks with regard to the differential decisions to prosecute Donald Trump to the full extent of the law (and arguably beyond it), and to allow Hunter Biden to walk after pleading to a lesser set of charges.
It is not enough for the Hunter Biden plea bargain to be defended on the basis that while unusual it is not unheard of for prosecutors to offer similar deals. Or to suggest that the charges against Donald Trump are within a reasonable interpretation of federal statutes.
The American justice system does not depend on technicalities and loopholes, which is the game many Asian countries play to stay theoretically within the law while coincidentally ensuring that all the unusually soft choices favor the ruling party, and all the unexpectedly aggressive charges land on those who might challenge them.”
“ProPublica, the nonprofit news website attacking Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, is funded by left-wing megadonors who pump money into court packing advocacy groups.
Picking up speed since the overturn of Roe v. Wade last year, the website has repeatedly alleged ethics violations against Thomas and Alito.
“ProPublica isn’t a news organization; it’s a front group for liberal billionaires wanting to ensure that the court rubber stamps their political agenda,” Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino told the Washington Examiner.
ProPublica’s publications have targeted Thomas several times, detailing his trips with friend and billionaire real estate developer Harlan Crow, Crow paying the tuition for the schooling of the justice’s grandnephew, and purchasing Thomas’s mother’s home.
For Alito, the website published details on a 2008 fishing trip he took with conservative hedge fund manager Paul Singer. ProPublica pointed out that the trip was not included in Alito’s annual financial disclosure and that he did not recuse himself from a case involving Singer’s organization.
Alito preempted the report earlier this week with an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, where he defended himself and accused ProPublica of leveling “false charges.”
“ProPublica has been in the business of launching partisan attacks on conservative Supreme Court justices for months now, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone given their funding from left-wing groups,” Mike Davis, founder and president of the Article III Project, told the Washington Examiner, adding the “entire project is revenge for overturning Roe v. Wade.”
“ProPublica exclusively cites leftist ‘ethics experts’ who confirm their priors about constitutionalist justices to satisfy their dark-money Democrat donors,” he added.
The website was founded in 2007 by the Sandler Foundation, which has given nearly $40 million to the organization since 2010, according to tax filings.
That foundation, formed by Herbert and Marion Sandler, has also funneled money into left-wing organizations that actively call for investigations into Thomas and advocate court packing. The Sandlers have been blamed in part for the 2008 housing market crash, even making it onto Time magazine’s list of “25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis.”
“The same Sandler Foundation that ‘made ProPublica possible’ with an astounding $40 million also gave $500,000 to Demand Justice, a ‘dark money’ court packing group that spearheaded smear campaigns against Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett,” Parker Thayer, an investigative researcher at Capital Research Center, told the Washington Examiner.
Demand Justice got $500,000 in a 2019 Sandler-earmarked grant to a group called New Venture Fund, which is part of a web of left-wing dark money nonprofit groups managed by consulting firm Arabella Advisors. The network spent nearly $1.2 billion in 2020 alone. Demand Justice has been pushing heavily for investigations into conservative justices, and its deputy chief counsel, Katie O’Connor, called for Thomas’s resignation in April.
The Sandler Foundation also gave $7.5 million to the Campaign Legal Center since 2015, a group whose senior director, Kedric Payne, testified before Congress as a Democratic witness arguing that the legislative branch should write ethics rules for the judicial branch. CLC wrote an April letter calling for a Department of Justice investigation into Thomas “for potential criminal and civil penalties.”
“The corrupt corporate media has been working with these liberal activists for decades, so of course Soros-type donors would be behind this,” a spokesperson for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told the Washington Examiner. “The fact is, Justices Thomas and Alito have complied totally with the Supreme Court’s ethics rules.”
Similarly, since 2010, the Sandler Foundation has given $6 million to the American Constitution Society, a progressive legal advocacy nonprofit whose president, Russ Feingold, called for Congress to investigate the Supreme Court for “violations of federal law and flagrant ethics lapses.””
Top Biden advisor Anita Dunn says Biden's historically low approval rating will improve because "people are just starting to really feel the effects" of Biden's "truly historic rate of success" pic.twitter.com/5dkl0xuSVx
In an unsurprising yet still-revealing development, the former FBI Assistant Director who (needless to say) now works for NBC News, @FrankFigliuzzi1, promoted what @AdamKinzinger reported was a group of feds pretending to be MAGA racists (note it was in Portland, not Boston): pic.twitter.com/TSJOXF2T9J
All joking aside, he's clearly one of the dumbest people to enter politics and media in years, but as long as it produces inadvertent admissions like this, I think it should be celebrated. Sometimes dumbness in establishment hacks is an important way that truth gets revealed.
I am about to go to sleep and just listened to that and thought I must have dozed off and began a bad dream, but No! I think he really said that as he was dozing off!
The US Prez . . . said what? Nightmare!!!
Wandering Views 
Parents worried that the pervs are targeting kids are once again proven correct. And this is in cities all over the US.
CONTENT WARNING!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Naming names. 🙂
The ball is in your court Republicans. You have proof, witnesses, documents….
So get moving and impeach Garland for lying under oath repeatedly.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As I said last night, the press will come for RFK Jr. Next up, Yahoo and the Daily (BS) Beast.
https://news.yahoo.com/treat-robert-f-kennedy-jr-010042090.html
“When it comes to debating conspiracy theorists, there is a simple but enduring rule—don’t.
The entire exercise is pointless because no matter how many facts you bring to the table—or no matter how much debunking you’re able to do—there are always new tangents and new questions raised. Arguing with a conspiracy theorist is like trying to untangle a ball of yarn that has no end.
That brings us to Democratic presidential candidate and conspiracy theorist devotee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
RFK Jr. Was Always a Crackpot, He Just Switched Political Tribes
In recent weeks, RFK Jr., who, according to recent polls, is attracting between 10-20 percent of Democratic voters, has become a focus of political media. There have been splashy profiles in the Washington Post and Time magazine; political analysis about his surprising poll numbers from The New York Times; and countless interviews with non-traditional news outlets, including a three-hour sit-down with Joe Rogan, the country’s most listened-to podcaster.
A growing number of billionaire tech bros, like Twitter owner Elon Musk, are praising Kennedy’s run. And according to a recent report from Brandy Zadrozny at NBC News, so many reporters are now covering Kennedy’s campaign there was not room for her to accompany the candidate to official events.
But, in reality, we should be paying less, not more attention, to Kennedy Jr. He has no chance of winning the Democratic nomination and he is not so much running for president as he is seeking a platform for his bevy of conspiracy theories that, in the most charitable telling, are misguided ramblings and, from a darker perspective, risk undermining public health and putting lives in danger.
The mainstream media is not required to give Kennedy Jr. a platform or cover his campaign, and they shouldn’t. The benefits of covering his quixotic bid for the White House are more than offset by the damage he can do by pushing his deranged conspiracy theories on an unsuspecting public.
What separates Kennedy Jr. from your garden-variety, conspiracy theorist dabblers is that he doesn’t just believe one of them—he appears to embrace them all.”
—-
Oh noooos!!!!!! 😳😨😳😨
—–
The attacks will come from both sides of the media landscape.
It will be fun to watch, that’s for sure.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-partisan-press-unwittingly-boosts-rfk-jr-s-campaign-youtube-speech-vaccines-a0cc68f0?mod=opinion_lead_pos7
“For a candidate with no chance, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is drawing a lot of media attention. Since the 69-year-old scion announced his candidacy on April 19, he has been dismissed and derided in the press, while consistently pulling about 20% support in Democratic primary polls.
A New York Times news article described Mr. Kennedy as “a longtime amplifier and propagator of baseless theories, beginning nearly two decades ago with his skepticism about the result of the 2004 presidential election as well as common childhood vaccines,” and claimed “his audience for such misinformation ballooned during the coronavirus pandemic.”
Much of this is true. Yet some of Mr. Kennedy’s “baseless” theories—say, that Covid lockdowns harmed lower-income Americans while enriching billionaires like Jeff Bezos—have a kernel of truth. They resonate with those who distrust what he calls a “corrupt merger of state and corporate power.”
To describe Mr. Kennedy’s political views as heterodox is an understatement. He opposes flu and Covid vaccines, pharmaceutical companies, lockdowns, the administrative state, fossil fuels, global elites, gun restrictions, social-media censorship and U.S. assistance to Ukraine. He wants to “seal” the Mexican border permanently.
Polls show Mr. Kennedy draws more support from Republicans and independents than from Democrats. According to a recent Quinnipiac poll, voters view him more favorably than not. The same isn’t true of other presidential contenders including Mr. Biden, Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Mike Pence and Nikki Haley. The Democratic dark horse’s strong show of support no doubt owes partially to his name recognition and to the public’s unfamiliarity with some of his positions.
On the other hand, it’s also possible that some of his iconoclastic views appeal to the disaffected voters who form Mr. Trump’s base. In the aforementioned poll, Mr. Kennedy has a larger favorability margin than Mr. Trump among whites without college degrees. Perhaps they see Mr. Kennedy as a fighter for the common man against the “man” just as they once thought of the former president. Attempts by liberals to silence and discredit Mr. Kennedy merely enhance his appeal.
Last week YouTube removed his 95-minute interview with Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. In a bit of irony, Mr. Peterson had noted in the interview that “YouTube has left me alone. It’s quite surprising.” After the video went viral, the site pulled it down citing its “vaccine misinformation policy.”
Yet it wasn’t Mr. Kennedy’s well-worn criticisms of vaccines or his calling pharmaceutical companies a “criminal enterprise” that racked up clicks. It was his claim that chemicals in the water supply—specifically the herbicide atrazine—are driving an increase in “sexual dysphoria” that is causing boys to believe they are girls. “They’re swimming through a soup of toxic chemicals today, and many of those are endocrine disruptors,” Mr. Kennedy claimed.
Journalists were quick to “fact check” him, noting that the frog study he cited as evidence wasn’t directly applicable to humans. That’s correct—but it was unusual to see the press shower a dubious environmental claim with appropriate skepticism. All too often they parrot such questionable assertions, including the notion that chemicals disrupt hormones.
Liberals deride Mr. Kennedy for his antivaccine activism, but it flows from the same fanatical font as the environmental zealotry they too have embraced. No doubt the mainstream press would deny the similarity, but Mr. Kennedy affirms it. In interviews he has traced his vaccine activism to his work on mercury pollution from coal plants, which he claims based on thin evidence cause brain damage and cancer. He also claims a tenuous link between thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines, and childhood autism.
Most of his claims about vaccine dangers aren’t any kookier than those that he and his green allies have made about fossil fuels. Both are based on flawed research and ignore countervailing evidence. But only Mr. Kennedy’s vaccine claims are fact-checked and suppressed. Americans have no doubt picked up on this disparate treatment.
Progressive beliefs, no matter how preposterous, are beyond question. Views that cut against the grain, even those that are scientifically well-founded, are silenced and labeled as “misinformation.” Justified criticisms of Covid lockdowns have been peremptorily dismissed as “baseless” in much the same way as Mr. Kennedy’s questionable vaccine claims.”
LikeLike
NYC’s idiotic Soros bought DA and his policies caused this. Intervene to stop the attack, you’ll be the one they charge. Call it “The Daniel Perry Effect.”
This is just his chickens coming home to roost.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Predictable….when exposed just whine and deflect…I am stunned he stopped short of calling his critics terrorists!!!
🔥 Late last week, the U.S.’s evil grandmother, Merrick Garland, mounted the official podium and whined about all the people criticizing the Department of Justice. He admitted the DOJ’s critics claim the agency is biased, corrupted, and weaponized are wrong. But, to prove just how neutral, unbiased and not one-weaponized the DOJ is, Garland labeled all the people who criticized the agency as dangerous underminers of democracy:
“Some have chosen to attack the integrity of the Justice Department by claiming that we do not treat cases alike. This constitutes an attack on an institution that is essential to American democracy… Nothing could be further from the truth.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
“As Predicted: Democrats and Media Waste No Time Going After Third Party Election Threats
“No Labels, the political outfit preparing to run a ‘unity’ ticket in 2024 that Democratic strategists and Never-Trump Republican operatives fear will siphon votes from President Joe Biden, is what’s known as a dark-money group.”
https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/06/as-predicted-democrats-and-media-waste-no-time-going-after-third-party-election-threats/
“Less than two days ago, I cited a new poll from Emerson College which shows that a third party candidate would pose a serious political threat to Joe Biden.
I closed by saying that we should expect Democrats and the media to aggressively go after any third party threats. I just didn’t expect it to happen this fast.”
“Let’s take a look at some of these articles.
From Mother Jones:
No Labels Exposed: Here’s a List of Donors Funding Its Effort To Disrupt the 2024 Race
No Labels, the political outfit preparing to run a “unity” ticket in 2024 that Democratic strategists and Never-Trump Republican operatives fear will siphon votes from President Joe Biden, is what’s known as a dark-money group. Unlike political parties, political action committees, and House, Senate, and presidential candidates, it is not required to reveal who is funding it.
And No Labels, which says it intends to raise $70 million to possibly place a third-party candidate on the presidential ballot next year, refuses to disclose who is financing this project. But Mother Jones has obtained a list of 36 wealthy contributors and corporate high-rollers who last year wrote big checks to support No Labels’ effort to win 2024 ballot lines in states across the nation.
This roster includes past and present chief executives of major companies, including Loews Corporation (a vast conglomerate), Fluor (an engineering and construction giant), Abry Partners (a private equity firm), SailPoint (a tech firm), and Fortress Investment Group.
Got that? Dark, corporate money. How dare they!
In case you missed the point, here’s Politico:
No Labels declines to reveal just who is funding its third party bid
No Labels’ bid to run a third party presidential candidate in 2024 has sparked a number of questions about political motivations. Chief among them: Who, exactly, is paying for this thing?
The centrist group consists of a constellation of entities, some of which disclose donor names. But the main one is a nonprofit which, unlike political parties, does not have to reveal the names of its funders. And in an interview with POLITICO, its CEO, Nancy Jacobson, declined to do so, saying simply that it was a “mixed” pool of individual contributors including “people that want to help our country.”…
No Labels’ refusal to reveal donor identities has worsened tensions in Washington, where a smattering of Democratic and anti-Donald Trump conservatives have accused the group of potentially kneecapping President Biden’s reelection.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. used to be a hero on the left. Now, Rolling Stone Magazine wants you to know he is basically an ultra-MAGA figure who is totally aligned with Marjorie Taylor Greene:
Pro-RFK Jr. Super PAC Has Deep Ties to Marjorie Taylor Greene, George Santos”
—–
Soooo predictable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Correct.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh Canada……
They have a degenerate problem that’s targeting children too. And of course Planned Parenthood is neck deep in sexualizing the kids.
SERIOUS CONTENT WARNING!!!!!!!
“Planned Parenthood distributed sexually graphic content at Canadian school
The ‘Using sex: From A–Z Cards’ game was distributed at a Saskatchewan school”
https://ngo.locals.com/post/4200608/planned-parenthood-distributed-sexually-graphic-content-at-canadian-school
“Planned Parenthood in Canada is upset after the Saskatchewan education minister, Dustin Duncan, suspended them from teaching in schools in the province. It emerged that Planned Parenthood brought a sexually graphic trivia game to a school in Lumsden, Sask. on June 19 that was distributed to children as a resource following a sex education presentation.
The “Using sex: From A–Z Cards” game features cartoon characters and text explaining various sex acts and fetishes, including fecal fetishes and sucking….”
—–
Note:
The description gets very foul after that so I won’t post it. See for yourself, but be warned.
As vile as it is, this is what they’re “teaching” kids.
LikeLike
For the clueless who still think Jan6 was an “insurrection”…..
“What a Real Insurrection Looks Like. Russia ‘Armed Insurrection’ Halts After Deal Reached”
https://stream.org/what-a-real-insurrection-looks-like-russia-armed-insurrection-halts-after-deal-reached/
“We got a taste of what a real “armed insurrection” looks like this weekend. No Viking garb or selfie-taking grandmas in sight.
And it had the world on edge.
The Russian mercenary force Wagner Group, a potent weapon in Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine, suddenly turned on Putin this Friday. Led by Yevgeny Prigozhin, the Wagner Group crossed into Russia, taking crucial military sites, taking down Russian helicopters, and began advancing toward Moscow. The military prepared to block the rebellion. There were even reports Putin had fled the capital.
The move was called the greatest threat to Putin since he took power.
What Happened
Prigozhin has been bitterly dissatisfied with how Russia’s military is conducting the war, including the lack of ammunition being provided his troops. The New York Times reports Prigozhin loathes Defense Minister Sergei K. Shoigu and Gen. Valery Gerasimov, the chief of the general staff of the Russian armed forces, and the feeling is mutual. The tug-and-pull highlights the disarray with the Russian military.
Prigozhin claimed he was forced to act after the Russian military attacked one of his camps Friday, a claim Russia denies. Indeed, U.S. has intelligence suggesting Wagner Group was building up its forces along the Russian border long before Friday’s attack. According to the New York Times, the U.S. kept quiet about it, not wanting to be seen as helping Putin in any way.”
—
“The Nature of the Deal
Prigozhin agreed to halt his advance, what Putin had earlier called a “path to treason.” His forces that did not take part will be offered contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defense, something Prigozhin previously rejected.
He and his forces that did take part will not face any charges for their insurrection. Yes, he invades Russia and gets less heat than had he walked into the U.S. Capitol January 6.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
So where does he go to get back his job and reputation?
“An NFL Player Being Cleared on Rape Charges Reveals One Nasty Truth About the Me Too Movement”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/06/26/matt-araiza-n2622997
“It cannot be overstated: this incident ruined this kid’s life. And it was all a lie. The wheels of justice spin slowly, which applies to all parties involved—guilty and innocent. We’ve all read stories of being exonerated for crimes they never committed years, even decades, after they were wrongly convicted. And for the worst of society, the true cancers, like murderers, rapists, and child abusers, it also takes time to lock them up. For those on death row, that wait is also exceedingly long. In some cases, the state moves so slowly in disposing of our most depraved convicts that they live to see their respective state legislatures abolish capital punishment. Yet, throughout it all, those who are wrongfully accused are powerless to see their life and reputations burned to ash. That’s exactly what happened to former Buffalo Bills’ punter Matt Araiza.
Selected in the sixth round of the 2022 NFL draft, Araiza seemed groomed to become the franchise’s long-term answer at the position. Then came the allegation that he was involved in a gang rape while attending San Diego State. Already declared guilty by the court of public opinion and those who manage the Bills’ public image, Araiza was cut from the team before the start of the official season that year .”
—-
“In the ‘Me Too’ era, erring on caution instead of verifying the facts is the default position. August 27, 2022, was when Araiza’s short-lived NFL career ended. Months later, the truth was revealed: Araiza was innocent, not even present when the alleged rape occurred. And it’s not just him; the two other students were also cleared in the investigation (via ESPN):”
—-
“He didn’t do it. It’s the dark side of the ‘Me Too’ era: women can lie about rape. They’re human, just as susceptible to greed, manipulation, deceit, and ruthlessness as the rest of us. The adage that such a damning allegation would never be brought up unless the supposed victim was telling the truth doesn’t hold up anymore with the proliferation of social media. These allegations receive immense attention, especially concerning the media industry and professional sports. Being a victim is also profitable for those who play this sick, twisted game at the expense of actual rape victims. And because this crime has been put on a pedestal, it makes the fabricated sexual assaults more devastating regarding obtaining justice for real victims.
The mantra was ‘believe all women,’ which quickly died when many liberal men started getting caught up in the mayhem. Then, some decided to take this ‘Me too’ card for a spin, claiming that mere bad dates were sexual assaults. Comedian Aziz Ansari almost had his career destroyed over such spurious claims.
And let’s not forget the 2014 gang rape of “Jackie” at the University of Virginia that never happened, which led to Rolling Stone and its reporters, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, getting sued and convicted of libel over their piece. Erdely was slapped with a $2 million judgment personally. The piece is an example of what not to do regarding investigative journalism, earning top honors for failing to do the basics from Columbia Journalism Review and Poynter Institute that year. You knew trouble was brewing when T. Rees Shapiro, a then-education reporter for The Washington Post, was able to dissect and easily debunk most of the piece’s core claims in a few articles. When the jury found the magazine guilty of libel in 2016, the publication’s lawyer, Scott Sexton, did not mince words regarding the massive failure we were all witnesses to, saying that the destruction of Erdely’s journalism career was just the tip of the iceberg.
“The magazine’s editorial staff was no match for Jackie…she deceived us, and we do know it was purposeful,” he said.
It sounds like Mr. Araiza was a victim of another woman who was good at telling fantastic tales. The 2006 Duke Lacrosse team knows that all too well, victims of a fake rape allegation compounded by a rogue local prosecutor eager to sacrifice these young men’s lives to get re-elected.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
But Orange Man Bad, so the rules have been changed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Damn the Republic!
Haven’t you heard?
The Orange Man is Bad, so sacrifices, including the Republic, must be made to stop him!
https://amac.us/how-american-justice-becomes-third-world/
“For nearly two and a half centuries, the United States justice system has provided a legal framework for the most prosperous and successful society the planet has ever seen. Americans have not yet begun to process the true costs of sacrificing the integrity of that system to achieve short term political ends.
The judicial system in the United States is composed of a mixture of democratic elements in the form of elected state prosecutors and ordinary juries, appointed or elected judges, and a professional police force. Thanks to this structure, it managed to maintain the two elements essential to the provision of justice in an impressive balance: sufficient independence to allow it to defy temporary public sentiment in order to uphold the law, but enough public legitimacy to ensure those decisions were respected and the democratic branches of government did not encroach on the powers of the judiciary.
Every work of political theory at the time of the founding, and the vast majority of what has been produced since, suggests this system should not have worked. Requiring jury trials for criminal cases should have turned them into lynch mobs, as it sometimes did in the Jim Crow South. Electing judges or allowing elected politicians to appoint them would ensure they would be susceptible to those momentary passions of the people. The election of prosecutors would produce a politized judicial system in which local strongmen turned the law against political rivals, carving out one-party dictatorships. The act of allowing jury trials in civil cases was madness itself.
The irony is that with some exceptions, including the tragedy of the Jim Crow South, most of these fears went unrealized.
The reason was the American people themselves. All of the tools of abuse were provided to them. Had they chosen, they could have used the judicial system to persecute their enemies and protect their friends. Carved out homogenous enclaves. Waged economic warfare against unfavored companies. Thrown out any judge who made an unpopular ruling, and targeted jurors who let off unpopular but innocent defendants. But by and large, they did not.
Prosecutorial and judicial elections existed, but until recently they often went uncontested. Individuals could remain in office for decades, only being challenged and defeated when they were either incapable of fulfilling their duties due to age or had ceased to fulfill them due to corruption.
This was reflected in the fact that most prosecutorial elections were non-partisan, and the trend toward partisan elections, pushed by both parties in regions where they are strong, has undermined the system in different ways.
Nonetheless, what made the system work was the commitment of the political class to make it work. In some ways, there was a de facto truce in which Democrats and Republicans agreed that when it came to issues involving the other party, they would “recuse” themselves.
This abstention required two things. First, it required both sides to mutually agree to play by the rules. If one side refrained from prosecuting Hillary Clinton or her senior advisors for mishandling their finances or classified materials, the other should respond in kind.
Second, it required an approach akin to the line about Caesar’s wife when it came to political cases. Upon returning to Rome, Caesar learned his wife had attended a party where indecent behavior took place. Upon being informed he was divorcing her, she challenged him as to why. No one had accused her of doing anything inappropriate herself. His response was simple: “Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion.”
If retaining the independence and integrity of the legal system required both sides to agree to play by the rules, then it furthermore required both sides to believe the other was playing by them.
It may well be that the Watergate, Iran-Contra, and Whitewater investigations were seeking real crimes and were conducted by professional figures, but their consequences could not help but promote partisan ends: the targeting of a president.
Therefore, it was not a sufficient defense for Ken Starr in the 1990s or those investigating Hunter Biden today to merely insist they are acting within professional norms. They need to convince the country they are doing so.
That is where the true judicial failure has occurred over the last few weeks with regard to the differential decisions to prosecute Donald Trump to the full extent of the law (and arguably beyond it), and to allow Hunter Biden to walk after pleading to a lesser set of charges.
It is not enough for the Hunter Biden plea bargain to be defended on the basis that while unusual it is not unheard of for prosecutors to offer similar deals. Or to suggest that the charges against Donald Trump are within a reasonable interpretation of federal statutes.
The American justice system does not depend on technicalities and loopholes, which is the game many Asian countries play to stay theoretically within the law while coincidentally ensuring that all the unusually soft choices favor the ruling party, and all the unexpectedly aggressive charges land on those who might challenge them.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
(Checks notes….)
Oh and the Supreme Court is Bad too!
So same as above for the media! Sacrifices, like integrity, fairness, and unbiased reporting must be sacrificed!
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/left-wing-funding-network-behind-propublica-targeting-conservative-supreme-court-justices
“ProPublica, the nonprofit news website attacking Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, is funded by left-wing megadonors who pump money into court packing advocacy groups.
Picking up speed since the overturn of Roe v. Wade last year, the website has repeatedly alleged ethics violations against Thomas and Alito.
“ProPublica isn’t a news organization; it’s a front group for liberal billionaires wanting to ensure that the court rubber stamps their political agenda,” Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino told the Washington Examiner.
ProPublica’s publications have targeted Thomas several times, detailing his trips with friend and billionaire real estate developer Harlan Crow, Crow paying the tuition for the schooling of the justice’s grandnephew, and purchasing Thomas’s mother’s home.
For Alito, the website published details on a 2008 fishing trip he took with conservative hedge fund manager Paul Singer. ProPublica pointed out that the trip was not included in Alito’s annual financial disclosure and that he did not recuse himself from a case involving Singer’s organization.
Alito preempted the report earlier this week with an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, where he defended himself and accused ProPublica of leveling “false charges.”
“ProPublica has been in the business of launching partisan attacks on conservative Supreme Court justices for months now, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone given their funding from left-wing groups,” Mike Davis, founder and president of the Article III Project, told the Washington Examiner, adding the “entire project is revenge for overturning Roe v. Wade.”
“ProPublica exclusively cites leftist ‘ethics experts’ who confirm their priors about constitutionalist justices to satisfy their dark-money Democrat donors,” he added.
The website was founded in 2007 by the Sandler Foundation, which has given nearly $40 million to the organization since 2010, according to tax filings.
That foundation, formed by Herbert and Marion Sandler, has also funneled money into left-wing organizations that actively call for investigations into Thomas and advocate court packing. The Sandlers have been blamed in part for the 2008 housing market crash, even making it onto Time magazine’s list of “25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis.”
“The same Sandler Foundation that ‘made ProPublica possible’ with an astounding $40 million also gave $500,000 to Demand Justice, a ‘dark money’ court packing group that spearheaded smear campaigns against Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett,” Parker Thayer, an investigative researcher at Capital Research Center, told the Washington Examiner.
Demand Justice got $500,000 in a 2019 Sandler-earmarked grant to a group called New Venture Fund, which is part of a web of left-wing dark money nonprofit groups managed by consulting firm Arabella Advisors. The network spent nearly $1.2 billion in 2020 alone. Demand Justice has been pushing heavily for investigations into conservative justices, and its deputy chief counsel, Katie O’Connor, called for Thomas’s resignation in April.
The Sandler Foundation also gave $7.5 million to the Campaign Legal Center since 2015, a group whose senior director, Kedric Payne, testified before Congress as a Democratic witness arguing that the legislative branch should write ethics rules for the judicial branch. CLC wrote an April letter calling for a Department of Justice investigation into Thomas “for potential criminal and civil penalties.”
“The corrupt corporate media has been working with these liberal activists for decades, so of course Soros-type donors would be behind this,” a spokesperson for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told the Washington Examiner. “The fact is, Justices Thomas and Alito have complied totally with the Supreme Court’s ethics rules.”
Similarly, since 2010, the Sandler Foundation has given $6 million to the American Constitution Society, a progressive legal advocacy nonprofit whose president, Russ Feingold, called for Congress to investigate the Supreme Court for “violations of federal law and flagrant ethics lapses.””
—-
Follow the dark money…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Suuuuure….. 🤣😂🙄
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feel the tolerance…..
https://twitter.com/lawnnoahm/status/1673276514287378432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1673276514287378432%7Ctwgr%5Eee36ce2b48a3004ef7282966a2520d3ecedbeb9c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt%2F2023%2F06%2F26%2Fpride-parade-participants-bark-like-a-dog-in-street-preachers-face-n2384853
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Uhhhhhh……
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am about to go to sleep and just listened to that and thought I must have dozed off and began a bad dream, but No! I think he really said that as he was dozing off!
The US Prez . . . said what? Nightmare!!!
LikeLike