It was so much shorter than “we want to kill unborn babies for campaign cash”…..
I’m wearing my abortion pin from @PPFA to tonight’s State of the Union address. Abortion is essential healthcare and we need to codify this right. pic.twitter.com/ZfNj5OEZcj
“After a 13-year-old Palestinian boy hiding behind parked cars allegedly opened fire on Jews in Jerusalem, shooting a father and son in their upper bodies before he himself was shot and wounded in return gunfire, the Reuters News agency wrote a sympathetic story about the boy, lamenting that he had dreams of “being a chef.”
Reuters has gained a reputation for its anti-Israel reporting, not unlike other major news outlets such as The New York Times. In November, despite clear historical evidence that the Biblical Temples stood on the Temple Mount, Reuters initially reported of the Temple Mount, the holiest place in Judaism, “The site, said to have once housed two ancient Jewish temples . . . ” Last month Reuters identified the ship Mavi Marmara, which had tried to circumvent Israel’s legal blockade of Gaza, as an “aid ship.” “The Mavi Marmara’s passengers were armed with weapons — which they turned against IDF soldiers — not aid,” CAMERA noted.
In the face of the surveillance video that allegedly showed Muhammad Aleiwat, 13, shooting at the Jews, Reuters titled their article “Palestinian Teenager Dreamt of Being A Chef Before Attack, Teachers Say.”
Have you ever asked yourself how does a 13 years old terrorist look like? Take a look at this VIDEO from today’s terror attack in Jerusalem.
The 13 year old perpetrator is a brainwashed victim of systematic Palestinian incitement to hatred and violence.
They just lie under oath now, and no one bats an eye.
Dems and Twitter execs keep saying Twitter’s censorship of the @nypost only lasted 24 hours. That’s false. They kept the @nypost account locked for over two weeks, until just before the 2020 election.
Vijaye Gadde, the former general counsel of Twitter, claims that its censorship of the NY Post article was done in line with its policy against hacked materials, but she does not mention that Roth & his team found they were *not* from hacking. https://t.co/Gn19rmFLEl
Twitter exec explains the medical training that qualified her to censor Harvard + Stanford MDs who questioned the official COVID narrative. pic.twitter.com/AiBoJx4JBM
Baker repeatedly and forcefully urged Roth and other Twitter executives to censor and thus discredit the NY Post story. After he did so, Roth reversed his decision, and censored the story. pic.twitter.com/ugejpBrs82
There was extremely strong evidence the Hunter Biden emails were authentic and *not* the result of hacking. The @nypost included a picture of the receipt signed by Hunter Biden and an FBI subpoena proving it had taken possession of the laptop.https://t.co/yB0qQ1fEbm
Yoel Roth, like Vijaye, opens his statement describing content moderation decisions that are not particularly controversial, such as against hate speech. This has been a strategy from many Twitter execs & defenders, including regime media.
Roth says that Twitter's mistake was due to his memory of Russia's hack & leak of DNC emails in 2016.
He fails to mention that he himself said FBI repeatedly primed him in 2020 to dismiss reports of the laptop as another Russian disinfo operation. https://t.co/VbUPuhLkDS
Roth says he regrets his tweet saying there were "ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE" and that he doesn't think all conservatives are Nazis pic.twitter.com/W8RevJgcx8
Roth confirms that he was warned in meetings with intelligence agencies and other social media companies that there could be a hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden, but adds that the Hunter Biden info may have come from another social media firmhttps://t.co/x7wqfC51nw
Roth says FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan said publicly that the documents Chan sent to Roth on the evening of Oct 13 did not relate to the Hunter Biden laptop. https://t.co/YMDpb5pLAm
Rep. @AOC says the "information coming out of the NY Post" was "disinformation," which is bizarre. She seems to be saying that the laptop is not authentic, which is not something any mainstream journalist or policymaker believes anymore.
But, as @bariweiss reported last December, "What many people call 'shadow banning,' Twitter executives and employees call 'Visibility Filtering' or 'VF.' Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning."
As background, @bariweiss documented widespread "incitement to violence" and hate speech by major political figures that Twitter did nothing about, even as it moved to de-platform a sitting president.https://t.co/rWhJ9EsWip
Gosh if only we had known he was medically unfit before the election…..
Oh wait…. we did know that.
#BREAKING: U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania Democrat who suffered a stroke during his campaign last year, was hospitalized Wednesday night after feeling lightheaded while attending a Senate Democratic retreat, his office said.https://t.co/yRng4Wf7Mf
Sen Fetterman staying overnight at GW Hospital after he began feeling lightheaded on Wednesday, his office says.
"Initial tests did not show evidence of a new stroke, but doctors are running more tests and John is remaining overnight for observation," Spox @the_vello says. pic.twitter.com/i2bHqL0oIF
And a hats off to some agents for trying to do the right and legal thing.
Say a prayer today for those at the FBI in Boston who refused to kowtow and perform a dragnet of J6 attendees as to whom there was no evidence of criminal actions.
So while Twitter is being proven right now in Congress to be firmly biased in favor of Left Democrat groups like #Antifa@Twitter suspends @MrAndyNgo for showing just how hateful & violent the Left & Antifa are.
I’m troubled that I can’t immediately rule out the suggestion that the U.S. blew up Nord Stream. I checked with a bunch of Senate colleagues. Among those I’ve asked, none were ever briefed on this. If it turns out to be true, we’ve got a huge problem. https://t.co/DG0dYTByPI
They’re openly worshipping Satan while millions cheer it on. Between that and the golden idol to abortion now on a NYC courthouse, and baby killing worshippers in Congress, their intent is clear, as is the side they’ve chosen.
A new golden pagan idol dedicated to child sacrifice (er, abortion) and RBG has been erected on a NYC Courthouse. It comes complete with the serene smile of an arrogant queen, Satanic goat horns, and serpents in place of arms. pic.twitter.com/6BjvkxoMPq
Satan worshipers at the Grammys. Baby murderer worshipers in the congress. Read the Bible. the book of Revelations. It explains things. https://t.co/lk642gSYbX
DEVELOPING: C-SPAN suddenly "lost our signal" of Twitter hearing as Republican member was documenting how Twitter not only did not ban Taliban accounts but sold advertising alongside their tweets featuring violent jihad
3) Big Tech then used that CIA lie – laundered by the corporate media – to justify censoring the NY Post's reporting on Biden's activities in Ukraine and China.
4) Once Biden won, all major outlets admitted the materials all along were 100% real, as was the story of its origin.
5) Even though everyone now admits the materials were fully authentic – that Russia had nothing whatsoever to do with those materials and they were 100% true – no media outlet retracted its lies.
CNN runs a segment gushing at the seems over churches like one in Connecticut holding Drag Queen Story Hours b/c the pastor rejects "hatred" & "venomous language," wondering why anyone would be "so upset" about drag queens in churches. pic.twitter.com/gNDCDlJh0Q
Call them what they are, political prisoners held by a corrupt, activist judge.
Update as to what’s happening in Proud Boys seditious conspiracy trial. Judge Tim Kelly (Trump appointee) continues to rubber stamp DOJ absurd evidence submissions—this time, it’s a brief clip of Trump in Sept 2020 presidential debate about Proud Boys… pic.twitter.com/i3suclf2i4
As I’ve reported, evidence in this trial is a joke. But Judge Kelly is invested in guilty verdict to justify keeping 4 men behind bars for 2 years before trial. That’s one major prob with pretrial detention order—judges game trial to prove they were righthttps://t.co/zAposuhnho
“It seems the Columbia Journalism Review has irked the Washington media elite with its painstaking reconstruction of the press’s coverage of Donald Trump’s presidency. The CJR certainly paints a damning picture of the press’s behaviour.
‘The Press versus the president’, a four-part study by former New York Times journalist Jeff Gerth, shows how journalists’ antagonism towards Trump, and their obsession with the baseless ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy theory, resulted in warped, deeply partisan coverage.
The media’s widespread anti-Trump bias was evident even before he became president. Throughout the 2016 election and during his presidency, the media characterised Trump as a ‘de facto agent’ of Russian leader Vladimir Putin (Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg) and the ‘Siberian candidate’ (New York Times columnist Paul Krugman – referencing The Manchurian Candidate).
According to Gerth, the media attack lines against Trump were provided by the Democratic Party leadership. During the 2016 elections, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) commissioned and circulated a preposterous dossier from British spy Christopher Steele. It made several outrageous claims, including that Trump had been caught by the Russian secret services in a ‘kompromat’ trap with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel (because ‘compromised’ sounds even worse in Russian). According to the dossier, Trump had paid the prostitutes to urinate on a bed. The details of the allegations were circulated among journalists, but not initially published. The story captivated insiders, who were so childishly thrilled at the prospect of bringing down Trump with this obscene story that they did not stop to ask whether they were being played.
Later, Steele and his main source admitted under questioning that the details were uncorroborated. Most intelligence analysts thought that the claims were junk. But the damage was done. The perception that Trump was in Putin’s pocket was fixed in the imaginations of Democratic Party supporters. Even if Democrats did not believe the letter of the allegations, they willed themselves to believe that there must be some truth to them.
The claim of Russian collusion originated in July 2016, when the internet pirates at Wikileaks uploaded hundreds of thousands of emails stolen by alleged Russian hackers. These emails had been sent between members of the DNC in the run-up to the Democratic National Convention, which would decide the Democratic presidential candidate. These revelations were particularly damaging for the winner of the nomination, former first lady and secretary of state Hillary Clinton. The leaked emails revealed that the DNC had favoured Clinton over left-wing challenger Bernie Sanders, and had attempted to undermine the Sanders campaign. In October 2016, further leaks of campaign chair John Podesta’s emails painted Hillary in an unpleasant light. She was portrayed as a friend of big business, who was paid millions in speakers’ fees to talk at meetings for Goldman Sachs and BlackRock.
The email leaks were devastating for the Democrats. They were doubly angered when Trump, in an interview in July 2016, said that if Putin was hacking computers, he could help everyone out by dropping the 30,000 missing emails deleted from Hillary Clinton’s personal server. To Democrat insiders, this was the smoking gun of Republican Party collusion, a direct sign that Trump was asking for Russian help. To most other people, it was a joke.
As Gerth explains, with Trump cast as a puppet of Putin, the mainstream media chose to view the Republican victory over Hillary Clinton as the Democrats being robbed.
This is particularly evident in the way the press covered successive official investigations into Russian interference after Trump was elected – especially the investigation undertaken by special counsel Robert Mueller for the Department of Justice. The mainstream media covered the Mueller investigation as if it would inevitably find that Trump had colluded with the Russian secret service. But instead it found no evidence to support the collusion allegations.
Gerth points out that a number of radical journalists of the Obama and Bush eras – notably Matt Taibbi (of Rolling Stone, Aaron Maté (the Nation) and Glenn Greenwald (the Intercept) – were all so shocked at the way that the mainstream media repeated the Russiagate claims that they broke ranks, and consequently fell out with their publishers.
Most poignantly, Gerth argues that the partisan and otherworldly claims made against Trump backfired on the media as a whole. The baseless allegations undermined public trust in the press to the point where in 2021, 83 per cent of Americans thought that ‘fake news’ was a problem. And as of last year, the US media had a trust rating of only 26 per cent.”
“In the past six months, documents with classified markings have been discovered at residences and offices associated with both President Biden and former President Trump, along with former Vice President Pence. How have the media covered these stories?
The timeline below shows total mentions of the word “classified” across CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News, from Jan. 1, 2022 through Feb. 5, 2023, using data from the Internet archive’s TV News Archive.”
Immediately clear is just how differently the stories were told. Coverage of Trump’s document handling begins largely in January and February 2022, peaking on Feb. 10, then quickly fading away until the FBI’s Aug. 8 Mar-a-Lago raid. From that point, it remained in the news until late October, with at least a few mentions a day through the end of 2022.
In contrast, coverage of Biden’s document handling began Jan. 9, 2023, peaked on the 12th, declined through the 21st, then rebounded with the discovery of a second cache of documents and reporting on the Pence discovery. Coverage surged again on Feb. 1 with additional Biden discoveries and has largely faded since.”
—
“In the end, the two stories received very different media coverage, with Fox News being an outlier in its much greater focus on the Biden document story than the Trump story. The story of Trump’s classified documents discovery lingered in the news for far longer than the media’s quick pivot away from the Biden story – but in the end, the public appears to have been far more interested in Biden’s story.”
“Has modern medicine deliberately decided to abandon its pledge to “first do no harm” when it comes to children and gender transitions? According to this self-described “queer woman” and Bernie Sanders supporter, the answer is yes. And Jamie Reed should know; she worked as a case manager for a pediatric gender clinic for “almost four years,” handling intake and care decisions for children confused about their bodies and identity.
She started out as a believer in gender transitions for minors. Now Reed declares in The Free Press that it’s time to bring it to a halt immediately, and end the deliberate damage that the medical industry is doing to this generation of children before it’s too late:
During the four years I worked at the clinic as a case manager—I was responsible for patient intake and oversight—around a thousand distressed young people came through our doors. The majority of them received hormone prescriptions that can have life-altering consequences—including sterility.
I left the clinic in November of last year because I could no longer participate in what was happening there. By the time I departed, I was certain that the way the American medical system is treating these patients is the opposite of the promise we make to “do no harm.” Instead, we are permanently harming the vulnerable patients in our care.
Today I am speaking out. I am doing so knowing how toxic the public conversation is around this highly contentious issue—and the ways that my testimony might be misused. I am doing so knowing that I am putting myself at serious personal and professional risk.
Almost everyone in my life advised me to keep my head down. But I cannot in good conscience do so. Because what is happening to scores of children is far more important than my comfort. And what is happening to them is morally and medically appalling.”
——
Note the “social contagion” part….
It’s important to read all of the Free Press essay written by the former intake manager of a pediatric gender clinic. To attempt to excerpt this beyond her statement of principles would be to essentially reprint the entire testimony. However, we can highlight some critical revelations within it as a roadmap to its importance:
“Reed started with the assumption that this was a medically sound practice backed by research, which turned out to be false
Anyone who raised questions ran the risk of being branded a “transphobe”
Patients frequently self-reported problems they didn’t have, including
Tourette’s and multiple-personality illnesses, which clinic doctors recognized as the effects of “social contagion”
When Reed raised that as an issue for gender dysphoria as well, the same doctors rejected it
The clinic “downplayed” the clear and unavoidable side effects of transition therapy”
That’s not the own they think it is. It’s called adulting.
The National Museum of African American History & Culture wants to make you aware of certain signs of whiteness: Individualism, hard work, objectivity, the nuclear family, progress, respect for authority, delayed gratification, more. (via @RpwWilliams)https://t.co/k9X3u4Suaspic.twitter.com/gWYOeEh4vu
“Joe Biden just did an interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff after not having done an interview in quite some time.
But this came after he received a lot of criticism over his handling in the past week of a Chinese spy balloon that he allowed to traverse the country and after his classified document scandal exploded over the past month. Now I wouldn’t say that Woodruff was a tough questioner, but she did ask questions about both topics.
Joe being Joe, he tried to blame other people for his classified document scandal. He claimed to Woodruff that the documents were there because the people who cleaned up his offices when he left didn’t thoroughly examine every piece of paper. He claimed he voluntarily let the FBI search his homes and offices.”
—–
"You said just possessing classified documents is 'totally irresponsible'? So, what was totally irresponsible about the fact that you had some?"
Philip Bump is another regime toady who makes excuses for left-wing racial discrimination because he believes that conservatives are bad people. And, like many of his WaPo colleagues, he lacks the basic capacity to get the facts right. It's left-wing slop all the way down.
When powerful, influential people make baseless accusations of treason, a crime punishable by death, in order to intimidate, silence and censor those who speak the truth, it has a chilling effect on our democracy. This cannot go unchecked. https://t.co/evoefpc0Yd
Wandering Views 
Of course they don’t, because they’re clowns pushing a false narrative, not facts.
“Biden’s Economics Advisor: Job Creation Is “Not The Standard For How We Measure Jobs Created”
LikeLiked by 3 people
It was so much shorter than “we want to kill unborn babies for campaign cash”…..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Trash media strikes again.
“13-Year-Old Palestinian Allegedly Shoots Jews. Reuters Laments He ‘Dreamt Of Being A Chef’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/13-year-old-palestinian-allegedly-shoots-jews-reuters-laments-he-dreamt-of-being-a-chef
“After a 13-year-old Palestinian boy hiding behind parked cars allegedly opened fire on Jews in Jerusalem, shooting a father and son in their upper bodies before he himself was shot and wounded in return gunfire, the Reuters News agency wrote a sympathetic story about the boy, lamenting that he had dreams of “being a chef.”
Reuters has gained a reputation for its anti-Israel reporting, not unlike other major news outlets such as The New York Times. In November, despite clear historical evidence that the Biblical Temples stood on the Temple Mount, Reuters initially reported of the Temple Mount, the holiest place in Judaism, “The site, said to have once housed two ancient Jewish temples . . . ” Last month Reuters identified the ship Mavi Marmara, which had tried to circumvent Israel’s legal blockade of Gaza, as an “aid ship.” “The Mavi Marmara’s passengers were armed with weapons — which they turned against IDF soldiers — not aid,” CAMERA noted.
In the face of the surveillance video that allegedly showed Muhammad Aleiwat, 13, shooting at the Jews, Reuters titled their article “Palestinian Teenager Dreamt of Being A Chef Before Attack, Teachers Say.”
—-
Sure, rather than point out that the kid is a victim of his own people’s hate and stupidity, just blame the Jews again.
LikeLiked by 3 people
They just lie under oath now, and no one bats an eye.
LikeLike
I’m not a doctor, but I play one on Twitter.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lies, and damned lies.
I’m starting to see why these folks were so cozy with Democrats.
And there’s tons more lies, all under oath. Click one and keep reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://wng.org/opinions/minnesotas-unthinkable-abortion-bill-1675685527?fbclid=IwAR16D3ci-TLTQ-Pd–aAhDI7eMsluw9cqY5TD3KJ0OqBMSH8wFv230blNv0
LikeLiked by 4 people
Gosh if only we had known he was medically unfit before the election…..
Oh wait…. we did know that.
And of course he did.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Disband these partisan frauds in FBI “leadership”.
And a hats off to some agents for trying to do the right and legal thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actual reporter does actual reporting, Twitter suspends him.
Musk still has work to do.
LikeLike
I believe the word is “escalation”…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.breakpoint.org/satans-historic-appearance-at-the-grammys/
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes Tychicus, it was bad.
I saw it on Twitter the night it happened.
They’re openly worshipping Satan while millions cheer it on. Between that and the golden idol to abortion now on a NYC courthouse, and baby killing worshippers in Congress, their intent is clear, as is the side they’ve chosen.
Sad.
This is the enemy folks.
LikeLike
Good, keep fighting these corrupt people and the injustices they’ve committed on innocent people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure, sure,…. 🤡
LikeLike
Totally innocent and unrelated coincidences I’m sure….. 🙄
LikeLike
Like I keep saying, compromised, and broken.
LikeLike
And this is the enemy within, in both cases.
LikeLike
The plot thickens….
LikeLike
Call them what they are, political prisoners held by a corrupt, activist judge.
LikeLike
Can’t wait to hear the explanation for this.
LikeLike
They’re true believers that Orange Man Bad, so this was always gonna be the obvious outcome.
And they’re still in denial and refusing to retract their lies.
“How the press fell for the Russiagate conspiracy theory
The media’s anti-Trump bias led them to abandon basic journalistic principles.”
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/08/how-the-press-fell-for-the-russiagate-conspiracy-theory/
“It seems the Columbia Journalism Review has irked the Washington media elite with its painstaking reconstruction of the press’s coverage of Donald Trump’s presidency. The CJR certainly paints a damning picture of the press’s behaviour.
‘The Press versus the president’, a four-part study by former New York Times journalist Jeff Gerth, shows how journalists’ antagonism towards Trump, and their obsession with the baseless ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy theory, resulted in warped, deeply partisan coverage.
The media’s widespread anti-Trump bias was evident even before he became president. Throughout the 2016 election and during his presidency, the media characterised Trump as a ‘de facto agent’ of Russian leader Vladimir Putin (Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg) and the ‘Siberian candidate’ (New York Times columnist Paul Krugman – referencing The Manchurian Candidate).
According to Gerth, the media attack lines against Trump were provided by the Democratic Party leadership. During the 2016 elections, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) commissioned and circulated a preposterous dossier from British spy Christopher Steele. It made several outrageous claims, including that Trump had been caught by the Russian secret services in a ‘kompromat’ trap with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel (because ‘compromised’ sounds even worse in Russian). According to the dossier, Trump had paid the prostitutes to urinate on a bed. The details of the allegations were circulated among journalists, but not initially published. The story captivated insiders, who were so childishly thrilled at the prospect of bringing down Trump with this obscene story that they did not stop to ask whether they were being played.
Later, Steele and his main source admitted under questioning that the details were uncorroborated. Most intelligence analysts thought that the claims were junk. But the damage was done. The perception that Trump was in Putin’s pocket was fixed in the imaginations of Democratic Party supporters. Even if Democrats did not believe the letter of the allegations, they willed themselves to believe that there must be some truth to them.
The claim of Russian collusion originated in July 2016, when the internet pirates at Wikileaks uploaded hundreds of thousands of emails stolen by alleged Russian hackers. These emails had been sent between members of the DNC in the run-up to the Democratic National Convention, which would decide the Democratic presidential candidate. These revelations were particularly damaging for the winner of the nomination, former first lady and secretary of state Hillary Clinton. The leaked emails revealed that the DNC had favoured Clinton over left-wing challenger Bernie Sanders, and had attempted to undermine the Sanders campaign. In October 2016, further leaks of campaign chair John Podesta’s emails painted Hillary in an unpleasant light. She was portrayed as a friend of big business, who was paid millions in speakers’ fees to talk at meetings for Goldman Sachs and BlackRock.
The email leaks were devastating for the Democrats. They were doubly angered when Trump, in an interview in July 2016, said that if Putin was hacking computers, he could help everyone out by dropping the 30,000 missing emails deleted from Hillary Clinton’s personal server. To Democrat insiders, this was the smoking gun of Republican Party collusion, a direct sign that Trump was asking for Russian help. To most other people, it was a joke.
As Gerth explains, with Trump cast as a puppet of Putin, the mainstream media chose to view the Republican victory over Hillary Clinton as the Democrats being robbed.
This is particularly evident in the way the press covered successive official investigations into Russian interference after Trump was elected – especially the investigation undertaken by special counsel Robert Mueller for the Department of Justice. The mainstream media covered the Mueller investigation as if it would inevitably find that Trump had colluded with the Russian secret service. But instead it found no evidence to support the collusion allegations.
Gerth points out that a number of radical journalists of the Obama and Bush eras – notably Matt Taibbi (of Rolling Stone, Aaron Maté (the Nation) and Glenn Greenwald (the Intercept) – were all so shocked at the way that the mainstream media repeated the Russiagate claims that they broke ranks, and consequently fell out with their publishers.
Most poignantly, Gerth argues that the partisan and otherworldly claims made against Trump backfired on the media as a whole. The baseless allegations undermined public trust in the press to the point where in 2021, 83 per cent of Americans thought that ‘fake news’ was a problem. And as of last year, the US media had a trust rating of only 26 per cent.”
LikeLike
Yet another example….
“Media Coverage of Biden’s Documents”
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/02/09/media_coverage_of_bidens_documents_148840.html
“In the past six months, documents with classified markings have been discovered at residences and offices associated with both President Biden and former President Trump, along with former Vice President Pence. How have the media covered these stories?
The timeline below shows total mentions of the word “classified” across CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News, from Jan. 1, 2022 through Feb. 5, 2023, using data from the Internet archive’s TV News Archive.”
Immediately clear is just how differently the stories were told. Coverage of Trump’s document handling begins largely in January and February 2022, peaking on Feb. 10, then quickly fading away until the FBI’s Aug. 8 Mar-a-Lago raid. From that point, it remained in the news until late October, with at least a few mentions a day through the end of 2022.
In contrast, coverage of Biden’s document handling began Jan. 9, 2023, peaked on the 12th, declined through the 21st, then rebounded with the discovery of a second cache of documents and reporting on the Pence discovery. Coverage surged again on Feb. 1 with additional Biden discoveries and has largely faded since.”
—
“In the end, the two stories received very different media coverage, with Fox News being an outlier in its much greater focus on the Biden document story than the Trump story. The story of Trump’s classified documents discovery lingered in the news for far longer than the media’s quick pivot away from the Biden story – but in the end, the public appears to have been far more interested in Biden’s story.”
LikeLike
Drag these degenerates and their mutilation of children out into the light. Expose them.
“Former gender-transition manager: Pediatric transition “morally and medically appalling”; Update: Hawley to open probe of MO clinic”
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2023/02/09/former-gender-transition-manager-pediatric-transition-morally-and-medically-appalling-n529482
“Has modern medicine deliberately decided to abandon its pledge to “first do no harm” when it comes to children and gender transitions? According to this self-described “queer woman” and Bernie Sanders supporter, the answer is yes. And Jamie Reed should know; she worked as a case manager for a pediatric gender clinic for “almost four years,” handling intake and care decisions for children confused about their bodies and identity.
She started out as a believer in gender transitions for minors. Now Reed declares in The Free Press that it’s time to bring it to a halt immediately, and end the deliberate damage that the medical industry is doing to this generation of children before it’s too late:
During the four years I worked at the clinic as a case manager—I was responsible for patient intake and oversight—around a thousand distressed young people came through our doors. The majority of them received hormone prescriptions that can have life-altering consequences—including sterility.
I left the clinic in November of last year because I could no longer participate in what was happening there. By the time I departed, I was certain that the way the American medical system is treating these patients is the opposite of the promise we make to “do no harm.” Instead, we are permanently harming the vulnerable patients in our care.
Today I am speaking out. I am doing so knowing how toxic the public conversation is around this highly contentious issue—and the ways that my testimony might be misused. I am doing so knowing that I am putting myself at serious personal and professional risk.
Almost everyone in my life advised me to keep my head down. But I cannot in good conscience do so. Because what is happening to scores of children is far more important than my comfort. And what is happening to them is morally and medically appalling.”
——
Note the “social contagion” part….
It’s important to read all of the Free Press essay written by the former intake manager of a pediatric gender clinic. To attempt to excerpt this beyond her statement of principles would be to essentially reprint the entire testimony. However, we can highlight some critical revelations within it as a roadmap to its importance:
“Reed started with the assumption that this was a medically sound practice backed by research, which turned out to be false
Anyone who raised questions ran the risk of being branded a “transphobe”
Patients frequently self-reported problems they didn’t have, including
Tourette’s and multiple-personality illnesses, which clinic doctors recognized as the effects of “social contagion”
When Reed raised that as an issue for gender dysphoria as well, the same doctors rejected it
The clinic “downplayed” the clear and unavoidable side effects of transition therapy”
——
Read the whole thing.
https://www.thefp.com/p/i-thought-i-was-saving-trans-kids?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=260347&post_id=101682797&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email
LikeLike
Ummmm… Uhhhh…..?
That’s not the own they think it is. It’s called adulting.
LikeLike
This seems newsworthy.
—-
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/02/09/biden-blithely-admits-one-of-documents-fbi-seized-is-from-1974-in-troubling-pbs-interview-n700851
“Joe Biden just did an interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff after not having done an interview in quite some time.
But this came after he received a lot of criticism over his handling in the past week of a Chinese spy balloon that he allowed to traverse the country and after his classified document scandal exploded over the past month. Now I wouldn’t say that Woodruff was a tough questioner, but she did ask questions about both topics.
Joe being Joe, he tried to blame other people for his classified document scandal. He claimed to Woodruff that the documents were there because the people who cleaned up his offices when he left didn’t thoroughly examine every piece of paper. He claimed he voluntarily let the FBI search his homes and offices.”
—–
Of course they did.
LikeLike
Weird, right?
LikeLike
“The dividing line in America is no longer between Right or Left, the choice is between normal and crazy.”
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep.
Crazy like this guy, who still sees Russians everywhere.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why it’s almost like the FBI is lead by partisan hacks pushing the Democrat agenda.
Because it is exactly like that. And they’re purging any who dare disagree.
LikeLiked by 1 person