“Tariff revenues SMASH records—slashing the U.S. deficit by over 25%! Shrinking government spending, downsizing bloated bureaucracy, and unleashing a wave of American jobs. 🔥”
Democrats intentionally redacted the victim’s name in the new Epstein emails because the name was Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said Trump did nothing. Hope this helps.
All the victims’ names are redacted in the Epstein files.
And now the White House and other Republicans can’t claim they want to protect the victims by not releasing the files since they were quick to release a name.
Since Trump did nothing why is Trump putting pressure on Boebert, Greene, and Mace to change their vote on releasing the Epstein files?
7:31 sure they did but that’s not the point…always trying to implicate the President even when the victim said she saw no wrong doing ….
It is sad that she took her own life for whatever reason we will truly never know…the entire mess is that…a mess and so incredibly vile.
The context is that House Oversight Committee Democrats released a version of an email from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell (dated April 2011) that redacted the victim’s name, in which Epstein wrote the victim “spent hours at my house with him” and Trump had “never once been mentioned” by authorities.
Republicans on the committee and the White House subsequently identified the redacted name as Virginia Giuffre, arguing that Democrats’ decision to initially redact her name was a way to “create a fake narrative” or “slander” Trump, because Giuffre had previously stated in a posthumous memoir and past depositions that Trump was “friendly” to her and she did not see him participate in any sexual misconduct.
Wandering Views 
https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/erlc-laments-scotus-pass-on-revisiting-2015-same-sex-marriage-ruling/
LikeLiked by 1 person
But muh narrative…..
Dems and NTers wrong again.
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1988705021580702088?t=1GTW_KPzsEqcUE_xs8FXqw&s=19
“Tariff revenues SMASH records—slashing the U.S. deficit by over 25%! Shrinking government spending, downsizing bloated bureaucracy, and unleashing a wave of American jobs. 🔥”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Watching the IRA funds go up!
LikeLike
Damani Bryant Felder
Democrats intentionally redacted the victim’s name in the new Epstein emails because the name was Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said Trump did nothing. Hope this helps.
LikeLike
All the victims’ names are redacted in the Epstein files.
And now the White House and other Republicans can’t claim they want to protect the victims by not releasing the files since they were quick to release a name.
Since Trump did nothing why is Trump putting pressure on Boebert, Greene, and Mace to change their vote on releasing the Epstein files?
hrw
LikeLike
New York’s mayor-elect Zohran
Mamdani called pro-life pregnancy centers
“fraudulent,” “fake clinics,” and said the city should “no longer tolerate” their presence.
He’s vowing to shut them all down.
Oh New York…😡
LikeLike
Praying that somebody will seek to change his mind by calmly explaining to Mamdani what pro-life pregnancy centers really do.
LikeLike
7:31 sure they did but that’s not the point…always trying to implicate the President even when the victim said she saw no wrong doing ….
It is sad that she took her own life for whatever reason we will truly never know…the entire mess is that…a mess and so incredibly vile.
The context is that House Oversight Committee Democrats released a version of an email from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell (dated April 2011) that redacted the victim’s name, in which Epstein wrote the victim “spent hours at my house with him” and Trump had “never once been mentioned” by authorities.
Republicans on the committee and the White House subsequently identified the redacted name as Virginia Giuffre, arguing that Democrats’ decision to initially redact her name was a way to “create a fake narrative” or “slander” Trump, because Giuffre had previously stated in a posthumous memoir and past depositions that Trump was “friendly” to her and she did not see him participate in any sexual misconduct.
LikeLiked by 1 person