Judicial Conduct Complaints have been filed against TWELVE Maricopa County Superior Court judges who presided over cases that directly impacted their own financial and professional interests IN ELECTION-RELATED CASES. 👀 https://t.co/y4aRrOO1tAhttps://t.co/1u3bl6vYPApic.twitter.com/opL0tcFiF2
— Kim “filterless” Wexler MA JD (@KimWexlerMAJD) December 7, 2023
Americans have the right to see all the evidence against them when accused of a crime. That includes all the good and the bad.
Yet the corrupt prosecutors have withheld, hidden, and destroyed evidence against Trump and Jan 6ers that would be useful to them.
And Never Trumpers stare at their feet, none of them smart enough to realize these miscarriages of justice hurt every defendant everywhere.
If they get away with this here, every defendant everywhere suffers. Get with it. This stuff matters, no matter how much you hate the Bad Orange Man.
New: Last night, Jack Smith filed a motion objecting to Trump's demands for vast amounts of evidence from various agencies including DHS and J6 committee.
I will post some highlights…
It appears DOJ is part of the scandal of the missing Secret Service texts. As I reported a… pic.twitter.com/3V4o8Wggf1
“New: Last night, Jack Smith filed a motion objecting to Trump’s demands for vast amounts of evidence from various agencies including DHS and J6 committee.
I will post some highlights…
It appears DOJ is part of the scandal of the missing Secret Service texts. As I reported a few days ago, thousands of texts between 2 dozen Secret Service officials/agents including the director and Robert Engel–the agent Trump allegedly attacked on J6 according to Cassidy Hutchinson–were deleted at the end of Jan 2021.
USSS claimed the purge was caused by a pre-planned reset of devices–and it happened after House Dems notified exec branch to preserve records related to Jan 6.
J6 committee subpoenaed the texts only to be told they were not recoverable. Now it looks like DOJ had actual phones but still could not find the deleted messages?
This is insane–no one can possibly believe this given the invasive tools the govt has and has used in this investigation.
This is in addition to Biden’s DHS refusing to give House GOP numerous transcribed interviews with Secret Service officials–also apparently the one with Engel.
The steps taken by Hunter to evade taxes are impressive, but not nearly as impressive as the efforts of the Justice Department to evade any reference to his father. In that sense, the indictment itself is a marvel of evasion.
“Below is my column in the New York Post on the second indictment of Hunter Biden. The tax evasion charges were brought in a type of Voldemort indictment, skillfully detailing millions acquired from influence peddling without mentioning “he who must not be named.” Indeed, it says nothing of how or why millions were sent to Hunter.
Here is the column:
The 56-page indictment of Hunter Biden for tax evasion makes for racy reading, with the special counsel describing a four-year criminal pattern directed at maintaining Biden’s “extravagant lifestyle.”
That lifestyle included massive expenses for strippers, sex clubs, fast cars and other distractions.
The steps taken by Hunter to evade taxes are impressive, but not nearly as impressive as the efforts of the Justice Department to evade any direct implications for his father, President Biden.
In that sense, the indictment itself is a marvel of evasion.
There are three glaring omissions in the indictment that tend to shield critical payments and conduct that implicate the president.
The Burisma-Ukrainian money
First, the special counsel only indicts tax evasion that occurred in recent years.
That’s because the long “investigation” into Hunter inexplicably allowed the statute of limitations to expire on the most controversial payments starting around 2014 from Ukraine gas company Burisma.
Recent testimony from IRS whistleblowers suggests that wasn’t an accident. Investigators were stonewalled, they claimed, and the Justice Department was previously moving to reject any charges against Hunter Biden.
Exploring those earlier Ukrainian payments opens up questions about Hunter’s influence peddling and would have highlighted the conflict in his father’s extraordinary move to force the Ukrainians to fire a prosecutor investigating Burisma by holding back a billion dollars in aid for the country.
There is still no explanation why special counsel David Weiss would allow the statute of limitations to run out.
But this recent indictment keeps the focus squarely on taxes not paid, not how the money was “earned” in the first place.
Hunter the foreign agent
Also missing in the indictment is any charge against Hunter Biden as an unregistered foreign agent.
Recently, the Justice Department added a charge to the indictment of Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) that he ran afoul of FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. FARA also was used to go after Donald Trump associates such as Paul Manafort.
The problem with charging Hunter with FARA is obvious.
It opens up questions about the millions of dollars going to the Biden family from foreign sources, a topic that Attorney General Merrick Garland has spent years avoiding.
In the second indictment, Weiss spends more time detailing the salacious use of this money rather than how and why it was given to the Bidens.
He just matter-of-factly describes millions flowing through these accounts from China, Romania, Ukraine, Russia and other countries.
The unindicted co-conspirator
By focusing on tax evasion alone, Weiss again avoids any direct reference to the focus of the influence-peddling used to raise these millions of dollars.
Even without mentioning the president, the implications of the indictment are devastating for the narrative and denials of Joe Biden.
The president has continued to maintain that he had no knowledge or interaction with these dealings. Those statements are clearly and knowingly false.
The president also maintained that his son has “never done anything wrong” and never accepted any money from China.
That is also untrue, according to the Justice Department and Hunter himself.
Yet Weiss continues to avoid any need to address the person who was the selling point of the influence peddling.
It was the same person who repeatedly called in to dinners and meetings, repeatedly attended events, and held meetings and photo shots for these clients.
Instead, Weiss indicts the failure to pay taxes on the proceeds of these dealings without addressing that underlying corruption.
It is akin to arresting a bank robber for speeding away from the crime scene without mentioning the reason for his flight.
In a scandal with dozens of references to the president and millions sent for influence and access, it took a steady hand for Weiss to avoid ever touching on President Biden’s role.”
Oh look, another corrupt Deep Stater gets outed. This is why he and Biden had to push their fake impeachment, to hide their own crimes. Couldn’t have Trump discovering the truth, now could they?
Something I’ve been thinking, re: “Never Trump / Never-Trumper”. Increasingly, I see that term applied to anyone who happens to not support Trump. But I would say that not everyone who dislikes Trump would consider themselves a “Never-Trumper”. Just like not all Trump supporters are as gung-ho for him as others.
Along with that, the term seems to be used to completely dismiss anything that someone deemed a Never-Trumper may write, and their views are automatically dismissed, without consideration. The Never-Trump label and other political labels (on both the right and the left) are too easy to use to ignore and dismiss other views out-of-hand that may have some merit.
BTW, there are plenty of women who color their hair like Rosa DeLauro has hers in that photo, and they’re not all Democrats. A person could be considered an old fuddy-duddy or a stuffed-shirt for thinking that DeLauro’s hair coloring or glasses make her liberal, and thus a Democrat. (Which would play into what McCarthy was saying.)
I don’t dismiss every thing a never trumper has to say if I know or trust the person. But I find that we usually don’t share the same policy goals, so whatever policy ideas they have, I probably won’t agree with. And even on things we come close to agreeing on, our priorities are often dissimilar our conclusions at odds. I don’t need to respect their point of view, nor do they need to respect mine. But we do need to respect their personhood— that they are created image bearers with all of the rights and responsibility that entails. I very much dislike hearing anyone referred to as trash or vermin.
———-
I have relatives who do the pastel colored hair thing, but I love them anyway. I think it looks flakey and unserious, but then I have practiced Christian head covering for the last 8 years, so who am I to throw stones at someone for looking flakey or different, right? 🙂
Debra – re: “But we do need to respect their personhood— that they are created image bearers with all of the rights and responsibility that entails. I very much dislike hearing anyone referred to as trash or vermin.”
Very much agreed. When I see things like that, I can’t help think of Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:22b. . .
“And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire.”
I am ashamed to admit that sometimes I have thought something like, “What an idiot!” Although I don’t (usually) say it out loud, I feel guilty for thinking it, and for the attitude behind it, and ask God to forgive me.
Wandering Views 
Checked and rechecked….
By corrupt judges….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Americans have the right to see all the evidence against them when accused of a crime. That includes all the good and the bad.
Yet the corrupt prosecutors have withheld, hidden, and destroyed evidence against Trump and Jan 6ers that would be useful to them.
And Never Trumpers stare at their feet, none of them smart enough to realize these miscarriages of justice hurt every defendant everywhere.
If they get away with this here, every defendant everywhere suffers. Get with it. This stuff matters, no matter how much you hate the Bad Orange Man.
“New: Last night, Jack Smith filed a motion objecting to Trump’s demands for vast amounts of evidence from various agencies including DHS and J6 committee.
I will post some highlights…
It appears DOJ is part of the scandal of the missing Secret Service texts. As I reported a few days ago, thousands of texts between 2 dozen Secret Service officials/agents including the director and Robert Engel–the agent Trump allegedly attacked on J6 according to Cassidy Hutchinson–were deleted at the end of Jan 2021.
USSS claimed the purge was caused by a pre-planned reset of devices–and it happened after House Dems notified exec branch to preserve records related to Jan 6.
J6 committee subpoenaed the texts only to be told they were not recoverable. Now it looks like DOJ had actual phones but still could not find the deleted messages?
This is insane–no one can possibly believe this given the invasive tools the govt has and has used in this investigation.
This is in addition to Biden’s DHS refusing to give House GOP numerous transcribed interviews with Secret Service officials–also apparently the one with Engel.
https://declassified.live/p/more-missing-j6-committee-evidence
WHAT IS THE SECRET SERVICE HIDING?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
—
“Below is my column in the New York Post on the second indictment of Hunter Biden. The tax evasion charges were brought in a type of Voldemort indictment, skillfully detailing millions acquired from influence peddling without mentioning “he who must not be named.” Indeed, it says nothing of how or why millions were sent to Hunter.
Here is the column:
The 56-page indictment of Hunter Biden for tax evasion makes for racy reading, with the special counsel describing a four-year criminal pattern directed at maintaining Biden’s “extravagant lifestyle.”
That lifestyle included massive expenses for strippers, sex clubs, fast cars and other distractions.
The steps taken by Hunter to evade taxes are impressive, but not nearly as impressive as the efforts of the Justice Department to evade any direct implications for his father, President Biden.
In that sense, the indictment itself is a marvel of evasion.
There are three glaring omissions in the indictment that tend to shield critical payments and conduct that implicate the president.
The Burisma-Ukrainian money
First, the special counsel only indicts tax evasion that occurred in recent years.
That’s because the long “investigation” into Hunter inexplicably allowed the statute of limitations to expire on the most controversial payments starting around 2014 from Ukraine gas company Burisma.
Recent testimony from IRS whistleblowers suggests that wasn’t an accident. Investigators were stonewalled, they claimed, and the Justice Department was previously moving to reject any charges against Hunter Biden.
Exploring those earlier Ukrainian payments opens up questions about Hunter’s influence peddling and would have highlighted the conflict in his father’s extraordinary move to force the Ukrainians to fire a prosecutor investigating Burisma by holding back a billion dollars in aid for the country.
There is still no explanation why special counsel David Weiss would allow the statute of limitations to run out.
But this recent indictment keeps the focus squarely on taxes not paid, not how the money was “earned” in the first place.
Hunter the foreign agent
Also missing in the indictment is any charge against Hunter Biden as an unregistered foreign agent.
Recently, the Justice Department added a charge to the indictment of Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) that he ran afoul of FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. FARA also was used to go after Donald Trump associates such as Paul Manafort.
The problem with charging Hunter with FARA is obvious.
It opens up questions about the millions of dollars going to the Biden family from foreign sources, a topic that Attorney General Merrick Garland has spent years avoiding.
In the second indictment, Weiss spends more time detailing the salacious use of this money rather than how and why it was given to the Bidens.
He just matter-of-factly describes millions flowing through these accounts from China, Romania, Ukraine, Russia and other countries.
The unindicted co-conspirator
By focusing on tax evasion alone, Weiss again avoids any direct reference to the focus of the influence-peddling used to raise these millions of dollars.
Even without mentioning the president, the implications of the indictment are devastating for the narrative and denials of Joe Biden.
The president has continued to maintain that he had no knowledge or interaction with these dealings. Those statements are clearly and knowingly false.
The president also maintained that his son has “never done anything wrong” and never accepted any money from China.
That is also untrue, according to the Justice Department and Hunter himself.
Yet Weiss continues to avoid any need to address the person who was the selling point of the influence peddling.
It was the same person who repeatedly called in to dinners and meetings, repeatedly attended events, and held meetings and photo shots for these clients.
Instead, Weiss indicts the failure to pay taxes on the proceeds of these dealings without addressing that underlying corruption.
It is akin to arresting a bank robber for speeding away from the crime scene without mentioning the reason for his flight.
In a scandal with dozens of references to the president and millions sent for influence and access, it took a steady hand for Weiss to avoid ever touching on President Biden’s role.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh look, another corrupt Deep Stater gets outed. This is why he and Biden had to push their fake impeachment, to hide their own crimes. Couldn’t have Trump discovering the truth, now could they?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Biden’s America.
Since Kamala just loves Venn diagrams….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems….. orchestrated.
Like a fed op.
On camera.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yay diversity, or something….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now Kevin will show you who he really is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Something I’ve been thinking, re: “Never Trump / Never-Trumper”. Increasingly, I see that term applied to anyone who happens to not support Trump. But I would say that not everyone who dislikes Trump would consider themselves a “Never-Trumper”. Just like not all Trump supporters are as gung-ho for him as others.
Along with that, the term seems to be used to completely dismiss anything that someone deemed a Never-Trumper may write, and their views are automatically dismissed, without consideration. The Never-Trump label and other political labels (on both the right and the left) are too easy to use to ignore and dismiss other views out-of-hand that may have some merit.
LikeLike
BTW, there are plenty of women who color their hair like Rosa DeLauro has hers in that photo, and they’re not all Democrats. A person could be considered an old fuddy-duddy or a stuffed-shirt for thinking that DeLauro’s hair coloring or glasses make her liberal, and thus a Democrat. (Which would play into what McCarthy was saying.)
LikeLike
I don’t dismiss every thing a never trumper has to say if I know or trust the person. But I find that we usually don’t share the same policy goals, so whatever policy ideas they have, I probably won’t agree with. And even on things we come close to agreeing on, our priorities are often dissimilar our conclusions at odds. I don’t need to respect their point of view, nor do they need to respect mine. But we do need to respect their personhood— that they are created image bearers with all of the rights and responsibility that entails. I very much dislike hearing anyone referred to as trash or vermin.
———-
I have relatives who do the pastel colored hair thing, but I love them anyway. I think it looks flakey and unserious, but then I have practiced Christian head covering for the last 8 years, so who am I to throw stones at someone for looking flakey or different, right? 🙂
Debra
LikeLiked by 2 people
Debra – re: “But we do need to respect their personhood— that they are created image bearers with all of the rights and responsibility that entails. I very much dislike hearing anyone referred to as trash or vermin.”
Very much agreed. When I see things like that, I can’t help think of Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:22b. . .
“And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire.”
I am ashamed to admit that sometimes I have thought something like, “What an idiot!” Although I don’t (usually) say it out loud, I feel guilty for thinking it, and for the attitude behind it, and ask God to forgive me.
LikeLiked by 1 person