“To anyone paying the slightest attention to the indictments so far resulting from John Durham’s investigation, the still-posted announcement of the 2018 Pulitzer Prize awards in national reporting to the staffs of the New York Times and the Washington Post now reads like an entry from the Babylon Bee:
“For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration.”
At the link the Pulitzer Committee lists some of the “deeply sourced, relentlessly reported” (well, it might have been the latter) articles they had in mind. Some of the more amusing and Bee-like in retrospect are “Emails Disclose Trump Son’s Glee At Russian Offer” (New York Times) and “Trump reveals secret intelligence to Russians” (Washington Post).
More ominous, less funny, and more than slightly disreputable, considering what we know now, is “White House received warning about Flynn” (Washington Post).
At the link, you can read the list of reporters who received the prize as well as the “distinguished journalists” who made the award, so I will skip over that, except to say the frequent unabashed appearances of many of these reporters on Twitter are one of the reasons I left that site some time ago. It nauseated me to see them on there, pontificating. There’s only so much self-deception you can tolerate.
Consequently, the question that most interests me is to what degree these people knew they were lying at the time? Were they merely victims of extreme Trump Derangement Syndrome? Did they believe the ends, in this instance, justify the means? They allowed themselves to be conduits for lies. Did they ask serious questions? “Informants, almost always anonymous,” were telling them things. (Collecting those anonymous informants has been the stock and trade of establishment journalists since Watergate.)
The most obvious conclusion is they wanted to believe the lies they were hearing, so they did not question them. To be blunt, they were lousy reporters and remain so because. most of them, all to my knowledge on the linked list, have not publicly acknowledged their faults.
One way, perhaps the best way, would be to return their Pulitzers. They have not done so. Are we supposed to believe anything else they say?”
Instead of stopping their war on American energy that has caused record high fuel prices, the Biden administration is continuing their weaponization of the FTC to shift blame and harm American energy companies. https://t.co/wB7edeUb1D
the president of the united states, who made the unilateral political decision to shut down the keystone pipeline, is going to the FTC over rising energy costs. you cannot make up this idiocy he’s trying to further politicize in a sad attempt to gain support back. https://t.co/msJNCGJm2q
Despite the evidence and testimony, the media just keeps lying…
Yahoo fact-checks the lie about Rittenhouse's mom. But misinforms readers about the source of the lie's resurgence. It cites a Nov 13 Insta post and a Nov 10 Fb post, ignoring the fact that CNN spread the lie on Nov 9! @louis_baudoinLhttps://t.co/lYTAqwo0C0
Speaking of corporate media disinformation, @Maddow rightly gets much attention for her deranged conspiracies, but Ground Zero for every media scam is MSNBC's former Bush/Cheney spokesperson @NicolleDWallace. Look at this random 2020 clip to see the lies & insanity she spread: pic.twitter.com/wj3oqJ9EF5
By the way: though they will never, ever admit it or face it — that's the benefit of having limitless funding from a billionaire — one of the outlets that most pushed and gave credence to the Steele Dossier fraud was @TheIntercept, always bolstering it.https://t.co/j3EH7629vYpic.twitter.com/2kHqGk49PA
Yahoo! News fact-checked the claim that Rittenhouse's mother drove him across sacred state lines to Kenosha and found that it's false: no evidence for it. Yet the fact-based journalists in liberal corporate media won't stop asserting this no matter what:https://t.co/uq8kL2uDTw
This is an important point about the bullshit "fact-checking" industry. On the rare occasions when they debunk shibboleths of liberal corporate outlets, they don't have the courage to accuse those outlets of lying, so they'll claim it came from FB users:https://t.co/o4PJYI1GGl
“The famous philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal once declared that “the only shame is to have none.” The problem with shame is it assumes a sense of guilt over one’s actions. In the age of rage, there appear fewer and fewer actions that are beyond the pale for politics.
Take Adam Schiff and the Steele dossier. While even the Washington Post has admitted that it got the Russian collusion story wrong in light of the findings of Special Counsel John Durham, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is still insisting that he was absolutely right to promote the discredited Steele dossier.
Schiff’s interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” may be the final proof of the death of shame in American politics.
Schiff was one of the greatest promoters of the Steele dossier despite access to briefings casting doubt about Steele and the underlying claims. However, Schiff recently has attempted to defend himself by claiming that Steele was a respected former spy and that he was lied to by a Russian source.
Schiff told host Chuck Todd:
“I don’t regret saying that we should investigate claims of someone who, frankly, was a well-respected British intelligence officer. And we couldn’t have known, of course, years ago that we would learn years later that someone who is a primary source lied to him. [Igor] Danchenko lied to Christopher Steele and then lied to the FBI. He should be prosecuted. He is being prosecuted. And I’ll tell you this, if he’s convicted, he should not be pardoned the way Donald Trump pardoned people who lied to FBI agents, like Roger Stone and Mike Flynn. There ought to be the same standard in terms of prosecuting the liars. But I don’t think there ought to be any pardon, no matter which way the lies cut.”
Schiff’s spin is enough to cause permanent vertigo.
Some of us have spent years being pummeled for questioning the obvious problems with the Steele dossier, including the long-denied connection to the Clinton campaign. Schiff was the main voice swatting down such criticism and his endorsements were treated as dispositive for media from MSNBC to the Washington Post. After all, he was the chair of the House Intelligence Committee and assured the public that our criticisms were meritless and the dossier was corroborated.
Schiff’s spin, however, continues to deny the obvious about the Russian collusion scandal.”
“A left-leaning, secret-money group doled out a whopping $410 million in 2020, aiding Democratic efforts to unseat then-President Donald Trump and win back control of the Senate.
The group, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, financed attack ads against Trump and vulnerable Republican senators and funded massive get-out-the-vote and issue advocacy campaigns amid the coronavirus pandemic, as detailed in a new tax filing obtained by POLITICO. It exploded in size during the Trump administration, going from a few tens of millions of dollars per year to raising and spending hundreds of millions.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund’s multi-million dollar grants singlehandedly powered some other organizations on the left, and it also incubated other groups, as a “fiscal sponsor,” that fought against Trump’s Supreme Court nominees, backed liberal ballot measures and policy proposals in different states and organized opposition to Republican tax and health care policies.
Its massive 2020 fundraising and spending illustrates the extent to which the left embraced the use of “dark money” to fight for its causes in recent years. After decrying big-money Republican donors over the last decade, as well as the Supreme Court rulings that flooded politics with more cash, Democrats now benefit from hundreds of millions of dollars of undisclosed donations as well.
“Altogether this is absolutely one of the largest fundraising machines I have ever come across,” said Robert Maguire, the research director for the open-government group CREW and an expert in political nonprofits. “I am really struggling to think of any other group, especially recently, that could rival it,” he added, comparing the amount of money flowing through Sixteen Thirty Fund to the Koch brothers’ network at the height of its influence earlier this decade.
While Sixteen Thirty Fund has grown to a similar scope in dollar terms, the organization rejects comparisons to the Koch network, casting both its mission and its model as different than the longtime liberal bogeymen. Sixteen Thirty Fund’s fiscal sponsorship model — in which it serves as an incubator and administrator to help get new progressive advocacy organizations off the ground — is a point of emphasis for the group, as is its backing of campaign finance reforms that would require it and other nonprofit groups to disclose donors and potentially reduce their influence on politics.
The group’s strength in 2020 was its ability to “quickly and efficiently launch new initiatives through our fiscal sponsorship model,” Sixteen Thirty Fund President Amy Kurtz wrote in a Medium post on Wednesday. “Alongside our partners and projects, we scaled up quickly (growing 175 percent from 2019), enabling progressive donors to step up like never before to help in the face of intersecting crises and imminent threats.”
Sixteen Thirty Fund’s total 2020 fundraising came to nearly $390 million — a new record for the group, and nearly three times more than the approximately $140 million it raised in 2018 and 2019.
Half of the haul came from just four donors, who gave contributions of $86.2 million, $52.7 million (in the form of stock), $45.7 million and $45 million to Sixteen Thirty Fund.
“I’m struggling to think of any group I’ve ever come across that has a single contribution that large,” said Maguire, who noted that it could be from an individual or from another nonprofit or other group.
Tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar and his wife, Pam, disclosed earlier this year that they were responsible for the $45 million gift, which went to Civic Action Fund, a fiscally sponsored project of the Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Another four donors gave between $10 million and $20 million, and 27 more gave between $1 million and $5.3 million.
As a nonprofit, Sixteen Thirty Fund is not required to disclose its donors, even though it spends significant sums on politics. But in addition to Omidyar’s self-disclosure, the New York Times revealed earlier this year that Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss’ nonprofits gave more than $135 million to the Sixteen Thirty Fund in recent years, which was earmarked for non-electoral purposes. A person with Sixteen Thirty Fund, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that contributions from organizations funded by Wyss did not increase in 2020.
The Open Society Foundations, founded by liberal mega-donor George Soros, also lists nearly $17 million in 2020 grants to the Sixteen Thirty Fund on its website.
Sixteen Thirty Fund’s single biggest outlay in 2020 — $129 million — went to America Votes, the liberal umbrella group that works on voter registration and turnout and collaborates with other political groups across the left.
The massive windfall from Sixteen Thirty Fund in 2020 was, by itself, more than twice as much as America Votes raised the previous year. Like Sixteen Thirty Fund, and with its help, America Votes expanded dramatically in the last few years, raising approximately $13 million in its fiscal years ending in June 2017 and 2018 before bringing in $64 million the next year, according to its most recent tax documents.”
Businesses wishing to ask vaccines of employees, must allow exemptions for:
Medical issues Sincerely held religious beliefs Pregnancy Previous infection Or the written consent of the employee to consent to masking or testing, the frequency of which will be determined by DOH.
Another media/Dem hero turns out to be just another scum bag.
“‘Jump-kick man’ who was filmed kicking Kyle Rittenhouse in the head before the teen shot at him is revealed as a career criminal with an open domestic violence charge for ‘throwing his girlfriend to the ground and attacking her'”
Make no mistake, if the verdict is not guilty, these lowlifes will dox the jury. They’ve already stated this, as has BLM.
“MSNBC News is BANNED from Kenosha Courthouse for the rest of Kyle Rittenhouse trial after a man claiming to be a producer for the network was caught following the jury bus and attempting to take pictures of jurors”
“Kenosha Police Department announced Thursday that a person claiming to be a producer for MSNBC attempted to photograph members of the jury
MSNBC news has been banned from Kenosha Courthouse for the remainder of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial
Addressing the court Thursday morning Judge Bruce Schroeder said, ‘This is a very serious matter, and I don’t know what the truth of it is’
That person was taken into custody and issued several traffic related citations
This is the second time that a person has been suspected of trying to obtain images of the jurors
Last week a sheriff’s deputy alerted the judge to the fact that a person had been trying to take pictures of jurors at the bus pick-up outside the courthouse
The identities of the 18 remaining jurors – 12 deliberating and six alternates – have been closely guarded amid fear of intimidation and reprisal”
Some pigs are more equal than others here on the farm…..
Rittenhouse is white and 17. Everything else in this tweet from a member of Congress is false. Yet the tweet remains up. Hey, @Twitter, I thought you were policing false claims. https://t.co/GculnHLki1
Twitter only polices false claims when they counter their approved narrative. Also done to claims that are not false if they counter their approved narrative.
Do you have any idea how many people between the ages of 0 and 17 have died of COVID since 2020? The answer is less than 1,000. For children between 1 and 4 it’s closer to 100. All these deaths are sad, of course, but those are hardly odds that warrant this kind of fear. https://t.co/hV51opGi0I
Full intent on seeing the jurors and contacting them after deliberations. Given the media's generally grotesque coverage of this trial, at what point does such behavior amount to intimidation? https://t.co/WcmEhppaPE
“”At pickup, there was someone there and video recording the jury, which officers approached the person and required [them]…to delete the video and return the phone to him. I’ve instructed that if it happens again, they are to take the phone and bring it here,” Schroeder said.”
They're destroying each other over tweets and other postings from when they were 13, 14 and 15.
Left-liberal spaces have become utterly toxic: mostly for those inside of them. It's a totally self-immolating climate. Nobody can survive it. Ultimate reaping of what they've sown: https://t.co/jiZcVE8B7r
"Impeachment proceedings are now in the works against the organization’s new vice president, Nourhan Mesbah, who is Muslim…."
Look at the living hell they created: an inferno bereft of grace or empathy, meant to contaminate all institutions but first consuming all of them: pic.twitter.com/HDr6jbUClc
Too bad she had to pay any money out. However, God can give her more than she would ever imagine. The satisfaction of doing what you believe is right is priceless.
Wandering Views 
Thank Trump ungrateful R voters….
——
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any minute now, I’m sure…..
“When Will the New York Times and the Washington Post Return Their 2018 Pulitzers?”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/when-will-the-new-york-times-and-the-washington-post-return-their-2018-pulitzers_4108286.html?utm_source=partner
“To anyone paying the slightest attention to the indictments so far resulting from John Durham’s investigation, the still-posted announcement of the 2018 Pulitzer Prize awards in national reporting to the staffs of the New York Times and the Washington Post now reads like an entry from the Babylon Bee:
“For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration.”
At the link the Pulitzer Committee lists some of the “deeply sourced, relentlessly reported” (well, it might have been the latter) articles they had in mind. Some of the more amusing and Bee-like in retrospect are “Emails Disclose Trump Son’s Glee At Russian Offer” (New York Times) and “Trump reveals secret intelligence to Russians” (Washington Post).
More ominous, less funny, and more than slightly disreputable, considering what we know now, is “White House received warning about Flynn” (Washington Post).
At the link, you can read the list of reporters who received the prize as well as the “distinguished journalists” who made the award, so I will skip over that, except to say the frequent unabashed appearances of many of these reporters on Twitter are one of the reasons I left that site some time ago. It nauseated me to see them on there, pontificating. There’s only so much self-deception you can tolerate.
Consequently, the question that most interests me is to what degree these people knew they were lying at the time? Were they merely victims of extreme Trump Derangement Syndrome? Did they believe the ends, in this instance, justify the means? They allowed themselves to be conduits for lies. Did they ask serious questions? “Informants, almost always anonymous,” were telling them things. (Collecting those anonymous informants has been the stock and trade of establishment journalists since Watergate.)
The most obvious conclusion is they wanted to believe the lies they were hearing, so they did not question them. To be blunt, they were lousy reporters and remain so because. most of them, all to my knowledge on the linked list, have not publicly acknowledged their faults.
One way, perhaps the best way, would be to return their Pulitzers. They have not done so. Are we supposed to believe anything else they say?”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Besides, with investigative journalism like this, you’re sure to get another one soon……
Or not…… probably not….
———-
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love the smell of desperation in the morning…..
They need someone to blame…
———
LikeLiked by 1 person
Despite the evidence and testimony, the media just keeps lying…
—–
—–
—–
—-
LikeLike
And speaking of people who lie for a living…..
“Adam Schiff, Steele dossier and the death of shame in American politics
Schiff’s ‘Meet the Press’ interview may be final proof of the death of shame in American politics”
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/adam-schiff-steele-dossier-death-shame-jonathan-turley
“The famous philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal once declared that “the only shame is to have none.” The problem with shame is it assumes a sense of guilt over one’s actions. In the age of rage, there appear fewer and fewer actions that are beyond the pale for politics.
Take Adam Schiff and the Steele dossier. While even the Washington Post has admitted that it got the Russian collusion story wrong in light of the findings of Special Counsel John Durham, House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is still insisting that he was absolutely right to promote the discredited Steele dossier.
Schiff’s interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” may be the final proof of the death of shame in American politics.
Schiff was one of the greatest promoters of the Steele dossier despite access to briefings casting doubt about Steele and the underlying claims. However, Schiff recently has attempted to defend himself by claiming that Steele was a respected former spy and that he was lied to by a Russian source.
Schiff told host Chuck Todd:
“I don’t regret saying that we should investigate claims of someone who, frankly, was a well-respected British intelligence officer. And we couldn’t have known, of course, years ago that we would learn years later that someone who is a primary source lied to him. [Igor] Danchenko lied to Christopher Steele and then lied to the FBI. He should be prosecuted. He is being prosecuted. And I’ll tell you this, if he’s convicted, he should not be pardoned the way Donald Trump pardoned people who lied to FBI agents, like Roger Stone and Mike Flynn. There ought to be the same standard in terms of prosecuting the liars. But I don’t think there ought to be any pardon, no matter which way the lies cut.”
Schiff’s spin is enough to cause permanent vertigo.
Some of us have spent years being pummeled for questioning the obvious problems with the Steele dossier, including the long-denied connection to the Clinton campaign. Schiff was the main voice swatting down such criticism and his endorsements were treated as dispositive for media from MSNBC to the Washington Post. After all, he was the chair of the House Intelligence Committee and assured the public that our criticisms were meritless and the dossier was corroborated.
Schiff’s spin, however, continues to deny the obvious about the Russian collusion scandal.”
LikeLike
Remember folks, campaign contributions are a no-no from foreigners.
Unless you launder the dirty cash thru liberal front groups….
“Liberal ‘dark-money’ behemoth funneled more than $400M in 2020
The Sixteen Thirty Fund sent the cash to groups that aided Democrats’ efforts to unseat then-President Donald Trump and Republicans’ Senate majority.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/17/dark-money-sixteen-thirty-fund-522781
“A left-leaning, secret-money group doled out a whopping $410 million in 2020, aiding Democratic efforts to unseat then-President Donald Trump and win back control of the Senate.
The group, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, financed attack ads against Trump and vulnerable Republican senators and funded massive get-out-the-vote and issue advocacy campaigns amid the coronavirus pandemic, as detailed in a new tax filing obtained by POLITICO. It exploded in size during the Trump administration, going from a few tens of millions of dollars per year to raising and spending hundreds of millions.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund’s multi-million dollar grants singlehandedly powered some other organizations on the left, and it also incubated other groups, as a “fiscal sponsor,” that fought against Trump’s Supreme Court nominees, backed liberal ballot measures and policy proposals in different states and organized opposition to Republican tax and health care policies.
Its massive 2020 fundraising and spending illustrates the extent to which the left embraced the use of “dark money” to fight for its causes in recent years. After decrying big-money Republican donors over the last decade, as well as the Supreme Court rulings that flooded politics with more cash, Democrats now benefit from hundreds of millions of dollars of undisclosed donations as well.
“Altogether this is absolutely one of the largest fundraising machines I have ever come across,” said Robert Maguire, the research director for the open-government group CREW and an expert in political nonprofits. “I am really struggling to think of any other group, especially recently, that could rival it,” he added, comparing the amount of money flowing through Sixteen Thirty Fund to the Koch brothers’ network at the height of its influence earlier this decade.
While Sixteen Thirty Fund has grown to a similar scope in dollar terms, the organization rejects comparisons to the Koch network, casting both its mission and its model as different than the longtime liberal bogeymen. Sixteen Thirty Fund’s fiscal sponsorship model — in which it serves as an incubator and administrator to help get new progressive advocacy organizations off the ground — is a point of emphasis for the group, as is its backing of campaign finance reforms that would require it and other nonprofit groups to disclose donors and potentially reduce their influence on politics.
The group’s strength in 2020 was its ability to “quickly and efficiently launch new initiatives through our fiscal sponsorship model,” Sixteen Thirty Fund President Amy Kurtz wrote in a Medium post on Wednesday. “Alongside our partners and projects, we scaled up quickly (growing 175 percent from 2019), enabling progressive donors to step up like never before to help in the face of intersecting crises and imminent threats.”
Sixteen Thirty Fund’s total 2020 fundraising came to nearly $390 million — a new record for the group, and nearly three times more than the approximately $140 million it raised in 2018 and 2019.
Half of the haul came from just four donors, who gave contributions of $86.2 million, $52.7 million (in the form of stock), $45.7 million and $45 million to Sixteen Thirty Fund.
“I’m struggling to think of any group I’ve ever come across that has a single contribution that large,” said Maguire, who noted that it could be from an individual or from another nonprofit or other group.
Tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar and his wife, Pam, disclosed earlier this year that they were responsible for the $45 million gift, which went to Civic Action Fund, a fiscally sponsored project of the Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Another four donors gave between $10 million and $20 million, and 27 more gave between $1 million and $5.3 million.
As a nonprofit, Sixteen Thirty Fund is not required to disclose its donors, even though it spends significant sums on politics. But in addition to Omidyar’s self-disclosure, the New York Times revealed earlier this year that Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss’ nonprofits gave more than $135 million to the Sixteen Thirty Fund in recent years, which was earmarked for non-electoral purposes. A person with Sixteen Thirty Fund, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that contributions from organizations funded by Wyss did not increase in 2020.
The Open Society Foundations, founded by liberal mega-donor George Soros, also lists nearly $17 million in 2020 grants to the Sixteen Thirty Fund on its website.
Sixteen Thirty Fund’s single biggest outlay in 2020 — $129 million — went to America Votes, the liberal umbrella group that works on voter registration and turnout and collaborates with other political groups across the left.
The massive windfall from Sixteen Thirty Fund in 2020 was, by itself, more than twice as much as America Votes raised the previous year. Like Sixteen Thirty Fund, and with its help, America Votes expanded dramatically in the last few years, raising approximately $13 million in its fiscal years ending in June 2017 and 2018 before bringing in $64 million the next year, according to its most recent tax documents.”
LikeLike
Finally….
A little sanity….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another media/Dem hero turns out to be just another scum bag.
“‘Jump-kick man’ who was filmed kicking Kyle Rittenhouse in the head before the teen shot at him is revealed as a career criminal with an open domestic violence charge for ‘throwing his girlfriend to the ground and attacking her'”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10217197/Jump-kick-man-filmed-kicking-Kyle-Rittenhouse-head-revealed.html
“Maurice Freeland, 39, has admitted that he was the one who kicked Kyle Rittenhouse in the head on the night of August 25,2020
Rittenhouse is charged with First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety of Freeland, who was only known as ‘jump-kick man’
The state has painted all these actors as heroes attempting to take down an ‘active shooter’
But DailyMail.com can reveal that at the time of the 2020 incident Freeland was out on bond and is a career criminal
He was charged with Battery Domestic Abuse, Criminal Damage to Property Domestic Abuse and Disorderly Conduct Domestic Abuse
Freeland was charged for an incident that took place on March 23, 2020 between Freeland and his partner Monalisa N McDuffie
McDuffie told police that Freeland ‘threw her to the ground and kicked her in her lower right ribcage…then began punching the television'”
LikeLike
The media is broken.
Make no mistake, if the verdict is not guilty, these lowlifes will dox the jury. They’ve already stated this, as has BLM.
“MSNBC News is BANNED from Kenosha Courthouse for the rest of Kyle Rittenhouse trial after a man claiming to be a producer for the network was caught following the jury bus and attempting to take pictures of jurors”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10218025/MSNBC-News-BANNED-Kenosha-Courthouse-rest-Kyle-Rittenhouse-trial.html
“Kenosha Police Department announced Thursday that a person claiming to be a producer for MSNBC attempted to photograph members of the jury
MSNBC news has been banned from Kenosha Courthouse for the remainder of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial
Addressing the court Thursday morning Judge Bruce Schroeder said, ‘This is a very serious matter, and I don’t know what the truth of it is’
That person was taken into custody and issued several traffic related citations
This is the second time that a person has been suspected of trying to obtain images of the jurors
Last week a sheriff’s deputy alerted the judge to the fact that a person had been trying to take pictures of jurors at the bus pick-up outside the courthouse
The identities of the 18 remaining jurors – 12 deliberating and six alternates – have been closely guarded amid fear of intimidation and reprisal”
LikeLike
Some pigs are more equal than others here on the farm…..
——-
The censor police only patrol one side…..
LikeLike
Fear porn is their fetish…..
———-
LikeLike
Intimidation is the point.
——-
And NBC’s denials are a lie as well.
LikeLike
Lie #1….
———
Lie #2…..
Didn’t film or photo the jury?
“”At pickup, there was someone there and video recording the jury, which officers approached the person and required [them]…to delete the video and return the phone to him. I’ve instructed that if it happens again, they are to take the phone and bring it here,” Schroeder said.”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2021/11/09/judge-reveals-someone-filmed-jurors-in-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial-n2598808
LikeLike
The eventual outcome of identity based politics….
———
LikeLike
Good news, finally . . . case settled. A number of years back , my brother and I dot to meet this special lady:
https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/florist-reaches-settlement-after-eight-year-legal-battle/
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder why the judge did not sequester the jury? It would seem to be a good idea for a case this widely watched and reporter on.
LikeLike
Too bad she had to pay any money out. However, God can give her more than she would ever imagine. The satisfaction of doing what you believe is right is priceless.
LikeLiked by 1 person