News/Politics 8-3-13

What’s interesting in the news today?

First up, something that will make you say “hmmmmm….”

From TheBlaze  “The Obama administration is “changing names” of the Benghazi survivors and “creating aliases” to keep them hidden from congressional investigators and the American people, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) told Greta Van Susteren on Thursday night. He also said the administration is “dispersing them around the country” to keep them out of sight.”

“Gowdy’s stunning claims were overshadowed by CNN’s bombshell report that revealed there were “dozens” of CIA operatives on the ground in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, the night of the deadly attack that killed four Americans. Meanwhile, the CIA is taking “unprecedented” to keep whatever it was doing in Benghazi a secret, according to the report.

“Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up?” Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names,” Gowdy said.

Good thing this a “phony scandal” and not a real. Otherwise this might look bad. 🙄

_________________________________________________________

Next up, of course he did. Your elite rulers and staff don’t need to worry about their healthcare costs rising. That’s just for us commoners.

From WhiteHouseDossier  “The Obama administration has granted members of Congress and their staffers an exemption from a provision of Obamacare that could have cost them thousands of dollars a year in added health insurance costs, according to Politico.”

“Congress currently allots itself generous health coverage through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Nearly 75 percent of premiums are taken care of. But under Obamacare, our representatives and their worker bees will be thrown onto the health care exchanges like millions of Americans – without the FEHB subsidy. Fair is fair, right?”

No. They’re special.

More here from RollCall 

_________________________________________________________

Next up, how easy is it to get multiple ObamaPhones, which is not supposed to be allowed?  Really easy.

________________________________________________________

Here’s one you’ll like. The prosecutor’s office in the George Zimmerman case is being sued by the man who blew the whistle on prosecutorial misconduct and evidence tampering. Sweet.

From FoxNews The former information technology director for Florida State Attorney Angela  Corey is reportedly suing for wrongful termination.

Jacksonville.com reports that Ben Kruidbos sued Corey’s office Thursday,  claiming he was illegally fired in June following his testimony that prosecutors  did not submit all information to George Zimmerman’s defense team in the  shooting death of Trayvon Martin on Feb. 26, 2012.”

“Kruidbos, according to the lawsuit, could not be fired for testifying in a  judicial proceeding in response to a subpoena. It also claims that the firing  was retaliation for his testimony in the Zimmerman case.”

________________________________________________________

And lastly, some more good news. 🙂

From NationalReview Quinnipiac is out today with a national poll on a broad array of issues. One of the issues they polled was a 20-week limit on abortion, which has been in the spotlight between the House’s passage of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, and Wendy Davis’ infamous filibuster and the subsequent passage of a 20-week limit in Texas.”

Women (60 percent) are 10 points more likely to back the 20-week limit than men (50 percent).

Hispanics back the 20-week limit by a 39-point margin, 59 percent to 20 percent.

Young people (18-29) back the 20-week limit by a 27-point margin, 55 percent to 28 percent.”

________________________________________________________

18 thoughts on “News/Politics 8-3-13

  1. Yesterday, the differences in state contributions and receipts of federal money was raised. Chris Christie uses that information in a speech directed at Rand Paul
    http://www.theeverlastinggopstoppers.com/2013/08/chris-christie-rand-paul-public-ass-whoopin-video/

    Its obvious by now that the CIA was probably involved in some black ops in the Benghazi consulate yet loyal Republicans want to shed light on state secrets. How different is that from Snowden or Manning ….

    Like

  2. Christie and Rand are the two extremes of what’s wrong with the Party. I’d like to slap them both. Christie is turning into a RINO, Democrat-light who thinks if he kisses up to the Democrats, then they will liiike him. Ask McCain and Romney what happens when you actually get nominated. You go from “nice guy for a Republican” to “racist, lecherous, dog hating bigot”. And Rand is the worse of the the naive, uncompromising, too good to play politics, my way or the highway libertarians. I’m more libertarian than I use to be but unless you get the presidency, the house and the congress you are going to have to play politics and make some compromises.and if the party keeps going Rand’s way that ain’t going to happen. I use to like them both because they were outspoken and said what was on their mind. Now I think they both need to shut up. These two idiots are going to split the party and hand the Democrats another 8 years. Of course I’d vote for either of them over anything the Democrats throw out here.

    Like

  3. KBells, I’m afraid it doesn’t matter what Paul or the jumbo-sized Yankee say or do. The US will be governed by Hillary from 2016-2024. The press feel guilty about the way they favored Obama over her in 2008. If you think you saw a biased press before, wait until the 2016 campaign. Meanwhile, the American electorate grows consistently dumber, lazier, and more perverted.

    Like

  4. Christie is what he needs to be in order to be elected in a state like Jersey. I don’t like it either, but that is reality. Christie needs Dem votes to win since by party registration numbers alone a Rep. would never be elected without crossover votes. Paul couldn’t get elected in Jersey, and Christie couldn’t in Kentucky. They are what they need to be, because re-election is all they worry about, not what party members in other states think, or want them to be. They are political animals, so they act according to what is necessary to survive in their states/jungle.

    I like some things about both, and can find plenty to not like as well. But if the choice is either of them, or a real Dem, I’ll take them every time. Reality does indeed suck. But what can you do?

    Like

  5. The division among conservatives is disconcerting as elections loom. No one seems to be rising to the level of leadership that is needed. I’m not fond of Rand or Christie either, am in fact becoming more and more annoyed by both.

    But with AJ, I’d probably go for either if it’s that vs. Clinton.

    I know many were underwhelmed by Romney. But tell me, in retrospect do you think it would have made a difference to have him in office instead of Obama?

    Exactly. Case closed.

    Politics is always a trade-off to some degree.

    Like

  6. Donna J, What is the answer to your question? How would Romney have been different?

    Concerning 2016, nothing makes any difference. Republicans can degrade themselves as Romney and Christie have done, but the American people are so lazy, stupid and immoral and the press is so biased that Hillary is bound to triumph. The only way she loses is if she decides to emulate Anthony Weiner and send out naked pictures of herself. Come to think about it, the press would say Bill drove her to it and she would still win.

    Like

  7. Ricky, you may be right about our culture having fallen to such a state that the war is over. On my most discouraged days, I think that way myself. The years of Obama have taken a horrible toll.

    But I’m not quite ready to give up the fight. Not yet. Maybe tomorrow.

    Until then, I think we need to keep on keeping on.

    Like

  8. I think the political fight (at the national level) is over for a while, not the spiritual battle. As long as we stay in the US, we can train our young how to live in a nation that is hostile to our faith. This was done by Christians in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Like citizens of those countries we can also teach our young about other countries to which they may flee and about areas of the US that are still relatively free of perversion and socialism.

    At some point in the future, the hearts of the American people may change. Until then conservatives in certain states can work to prevent their cities from turning into additional Detoits or San Franciscos. However, I do not think it is at all realistic to expect the US to elect a conservative president in the foreseeable future.

    Like

  9. But there is also this:

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/07/voters-trust-republicans-more-on-issues.php

    The national downhill slide began years ago, of course; but it’s been surprising to watch the accelerated pace of the slide in just the past 6 years. 😦 Voters are either oblivious & disengaged; not very thoughtful or discerning in their thinking; or all of the above.

    Most countries last 200 years, so we’ve surpassed that. Perhaps we’ll just be part of the cyclical existence of nations. Once great, later … not so much.

    Like

  10. Donna J, It is all of the above. More than anything, most Americans are stupid, lazy and selfish. They are lazy and want the government to provide for them what they should provide for themselves. They are selfish and they do not care that their demands on government are creating an unsustainable burden on their grandchildren. They are stupid in that they have no idea of the unintended consequences of government actions.

    All of this has been best illustrated by the current health care debate. After Paul Ryan was torched from all sides for his rational reform proposal to convert Medicare to a voucher (oops, can’t say that word) program, no one has spoken honestly about the issue.

    Like

  11. Karen, was it the “Jumbo” or the “Yankee”? I have friends from the Northeast who call themselves Yankees. One did object to “carpetbagger” though. 🙂

    Like

  12. It was the “jumbo”, kBells. 🙂 I do not consider “Yankee” to be an insult, even though I suspect it may have been used that way.

    Like

Leave a reply to donna j Cancel reply