News/Politics 1-11-13

What’s news today?

There’s a bunch of stuff to choose from.

Let’s start with the coming gun restriction attempts. VP Biden says they should release their “plan” to the President on Tuesday.

From the WallStJournal

“Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday he would recommend the White House push for broad measures to stem gun violence, citing growing support for tighter background checks on gun purchasers, restrictions on high-capacity clips and other moves.

But the National Rifle Association delivered a swift rebuke following a meeting with Mr. Biden, saying the administration was gearing up for an attack on gun ownership.”

__________________________________________________

It looks like some states may plan a pre-emptive approach to such talk.

From TheWashingtonExaminer

“Wyoming lawmakers have proposed a new bill that, if passed, would nullify any federal restrictions on guns, threatening to jail federal agents attempting to confiscate guns, ammunition magazines or ammunition.

The bill – HB0104 – states that “any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on firearms in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming.”

The bill is sponsored by eight Wyoming state representatives and two state senators. If passed, the bill would declare any federal gun regulation created on or after January 1, 2013 to be unenforceable within the state.”

__________________________________________________

If we’re going to have this conversation, it needs to be fact, not emotion based. So let’s look at some stats, and obvious examples of the mis-information employed by one side. The facts show that they have little to back their claims.

Here’s more from HotAir

__________________________________________________

Here’s a nice piece that exposes the charade. Or we could title it “Piers Morgan is a hack.”

From Fox, via NewsBusters

“CNN’s Piers Morgan has for days cited U.S. and British gun homicide  statistics in an attempt to get stricter controls on firearms here in America.

On Tuesday, Cincinnati Fox affiliate WXIX thoroughly debunked many of  Morgan’s claims (video follows with transcribed highlights and commentary):”

__________________________________________________

Last week I linked to a story on the American Freshman Survey, a survey of incoming college students. The authors said we have a severe problem with narcissistic younger adults and their unrealistic assumptions about themselves and the world. Here’s more from the lead author of the analysis.

From FoxNews

“A new analysis of the American Freshman Survey, which has accumulated data  for the past 47 years from 9 million young adults, reveals that college students  are more likely than ever to call themselves gifted and driven to succeed, even  though their test scores and time spent studying are decreasing.

Psychologist Jean Twenge, the lead author of the analysis, is also the author  of a study showing that the tendency toward narcissism in students is up 30  percent in the last thirty-odd years. This data is not unexpected.  I  have been writing a great deal over the past few years about the toxic  psychological impact of media and technology on children, adolescents and young  adults, particularly as it regards turning them into faux celebrities—the  equivalent of lead actors in their own fictionalized life stories.

On Facebook, young people can fool themselves into thinking they have  hundreds or thousands of “friends.” They can delete unflattering comments. They  can block anyone who disagrees with them or pokes holes in their inflated  self-esteem. They can choose to show the world only flattering, sexy or funny  photographs of themselves (dozens of albums full, by the way), “speak” in pithy  short posts and publicly connect to movie stars and professional athletes and  musicians they “like.””

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is also yet another indictment of the public education system.

__________________________________________________

And a final one. It’s nice when the govt occasionally get’s it right. Too bad we had to nearly melt down the housing market before they did, but hey, at least they finally seem to be getting it.

From HotAir

“Of all the provisions of Dodd-Frank conservatives disliked, the Consumer Financial Protection Board may have been the one least liked of all.  Its proponent, Elizabeth Warren, ended up in the US Senate when Republicans refused to support her nomination to run the CFPB, perhaps a bit of karma in the long run.  Now the CFPB has released its first set of mortgage rules, ostensibly to protect consumers — and conservatives may like what they see, at least conceptually if not organizationally:

The government is establishing new rules for mortgages that will make it harder for some borrowers to qualify but that are designed to prevent the kind of risky lending that nearly caused the housing market to collapse during the financial crisis.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Thursday will roll out the first of several far-reaching changes to the nation’s mortgage market, limiting upfront fees and curtailing practices such as interest-only payments that can leave homeowners stuck with unsustainable loans. The agency also will set standards for how much income a consumer must have to obtain a mortgage.

This marks the first time the government has spelled out what constitutes a “qualified mortgage,” an effort to prevent the widespread toxic loans that hurt millions of Americans during the housing crisis.”

__________________________________________________

8 thoughts on “News/Politics 1-11-13

  1. Richard Feldman, president of the Independent Firearm Owners Association Inc., said a number of areas of agreement emerged during the meeting attended by the NRA, especially on civil commitment laws for the mentally ill and increased penalties for gun trafficking.

    Does that mean that Lanny Brewer, Eric Holder and Barak Husein Obama will be held accountable for Fast and Furious?

    🙄

    It will never happen Folks. Bimbo Biden, Holder and Obozo are fully committed to making Law abiding citizens into criminals.

    Like

  2. “Bimbo Biden, Holder and Obozo…”

    Back in 1968, when I was in Kindergarten, we used to make fun of people’s names. I thought people outgrew that when they became adults.

    With the number of names that liberals came up with for President Bush (Shrub, Bushitler, etc. etc. ad nauseum) I realized that wasn’t the case.

    I hope we’re better than them in this area, arguing respectfully about ideas and policies, while avoiding mocking and name-calling. 🙂

    Like

  3. Respect is earned by individuals from those they lead. Respect of the office is much different. When John Kerry got up in front of Congress and lied about those of us who served in Vietnam as being partners in torture or war crimes, he lost the respect of those who he led. Those of us in turn came home from Vietnam being called baby killers, having to endure verbal and sometimes even physical abuse. I may respect the office of the presidency, but I do not have to respect the person occupying the office, especially when that individual attempts to subvert the Constitution–the very document he swore to uphold and defend.

    Like

  4. I will limit my comments on the 2nd Amendment (it puzzles foreigners to no end) but I do question the rhetorical excess. As reported by the Atlantic, Obama can do very little without Congress. He can modernizing the background check system, perhaps ask for more information, and limit importation of assault rifles. The rest is up to Congress.

    I am however struck by the irony of conservatives up in arms (no pun intended) over minor limits to the second amendment (which does mention well regulated) while Steve King and other Republicans are attempting to legislate a repeal of the 14th Amendment. You may disagree with the current interpretation but as it stands you can’t legislate it out of existence.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/steve-king-anchor-babies_n_2411989.html

    Like

  5. Its not ironic they favour one but not the other. The irony is they’re paranoid about any legislative/executive regulations on one yet attempt to legislate any other completely out of existence

    When you rebel, you need to understand there will be penalties prior to readmission. The 14th was part of reconstruction. One can easily argue that seceding states need to accept amendments passed during their secession or prior to their readmission.

    Its broad application can be questioned but not its legitimacy. Even its broad application was noted at the time of its passing and no attempt was made to modify it.

    Like

  6. The irony is they’re paranoid about any legislative/executive regulations on one yet attempt to legislate any other completely out of existence.

    Yeah not seeing the “irony” there. Sounds like just a rephrasing of “they favor one but not the other.”

    Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply