This is the news thread. Talk about whatever is news to you.
Media bias.
One side says it exist and happens all the time. This side disagrees with the “mainstream: media for the most part. The other side says it doesn’t exist, that it’s a myth. This side mostly agrees with the “mainstream” media. Who’s right? Who’s wrong? And could it be both are to some extent?
The situation in the last couple days in Egypt and elsewhere has brought the differences the two sides have over media bias to light yet again. I have a few things here for your consideration.
The first piece.
From the Washington Examiner
“We’re still learning more details about the events leading up to and surrounding the attacks by Islamic radicals on the U.S. consulate in Libya and embassy in Egypt, but the media has already agreed on one thing: Mitt Romney is the political loser.
“Unless the Romney campaign has gamed this crisis out in some manner completely invisible to the Gang of 500, his doubling down on criticism of the President for the statement coming out of Cairo is likely to be seen as one of the most craven and ill-advised tactical moves in this entire campaign,” opined Time’s Mark Halperin.
That instant conventional wisdom is a pretty fortunate turn of events for Obama, given that it diverted focus from his administration’s bungled handling of the entire situation and the failure of his broader foreign policy posture.”
Read more here
Now the second.
From The Right Scoop
“Open Mic Catches Press Coordinating Questions For Romney”
Read more here
And finally, this.
From National Review
“So if a presidential candidate gives remarks about a foreign-policy crisis, you’d be forgiven for thinking that in the Q&A held immediately afterward, reporters would ask him about . . . foreign policy. But when Mitt Romney took questions today after talking about the situation in Libya and Egypt, the dominant theme of the questions was all about process and politics. Here are the seven questions asked:”
“3. “The world is watching. Isn’t this itself a mixed signal when you criticize the administration at a time that Americans are being killed? Shouldn’t politics stop for this?””
Read more here
Is this bias?
That question number 3 bothered me a lot. I don’t recall GWB getting a break because Americans were dying. Why should Obama?
As you can see from the questions, they were all designed to make Mitt look bad. We also know they were coordinated amongst media members. Doesn’t this go beyond reporting to something else, maybe a Journolist kinda thing? It certainly seems like bias to me.