Nearly half of all public school students in the US that entered the 2022-2023 academic year are lagging behind benchmarks, according to a new Department of Education report. pic.twitter.com/VEDnvXcmpt
Cancelling student debt (which is already overpriced) has nothing to do with gaining education or being more competitive.
The problem is the education system itself. It needs massive structural reform and no amount of money, debt, or credit can change that. https://t.co/kcSnnOK4VE
This posts tells us that you spent $2B more paying off debt for folks who already got an education than you did on educating the kids still in school. And HBCUs got less than 1/5 as much as the freeloaders. Good job. https://t.co/OQQ0GCZG3S
Biden won’t say a word. If he does, China will expose his family’s corruption with them.
The Chinese military is ramping up its ability to disrupt key American infrastructure, including power and water utilities as well as communications and transportation systems, according to U.S. officials and industry security officials.https://t.co/o1z71pOf0F
China’s military army is hacking critical US services in preparation for conflict. Can we count on Joe "Spy Balloon" Biden to be prepared too? https://t.co/DbfuyZabnp
There are hundreds of thousands of military age Chinese men crossing the southern border and the Biden Administration ignores it. We are not prepared for what comes next. https://t.co/kKvp0hremw
🚨 H.R.6611: "Your business landlord, Airbnb host, hotel manager, or barista will have legal obligation to give gov't any of your emails, texts, or phone metadata that ran through their equipment. Data centers would also be enlisted in spying on Americans." @savingprivacy#ampFWhttps://t.co/C4cufi5TvZ
To call the expansion of gov’t-mandated spying “reform” is laughable – the current House Intel proposal added “equipment” (any small or med.-sized biz that provides Wi-Fi or stores data) making your biz landlord, hotel mgr, etc., legally obligated to give data to the gov’t. https://t.co/kbHJIwsMdD
There's scant difference between the parties anymore. They're both hostile to individual liberty and scornful of ordinary citizens. A pox on both their houses. https://t.co/fumn5g4fxf
So the ‘reform’ is to limit things they don’t do anyway but add reporting requirements to any source that might have desired data transit through their servers? This is a huge expansion of hidden spying in the name of limiting it.
Subtlety died as soon as facebook was invented and we started letting 13 year olds decide what was moral with no social or historical context https://t.co/ut5cpzlT1N
Well that’s weird. The media seems to have missed this info, since they’re not reporting it. I wonder how that happened? 🙄
🧵 ON THE INVESTIGATION OF JOE BIDEN
Since January, we have obtained and reviewed thousands of pages of financial records, text messages, emails, and witness testimony that reveal President Biden’s corruption.
Devon Archer, former Hunter business partner, revealed to us that Joe Biden spoke to his son’s associates by speakerphone OVER 20 TIMES, dined with foreign oligarchs and a Burisma executive, and had coffee with his son’s Chinese associate – all when he was Vice President. pic.twitter.com/jZ0IQ93Lod
Documents from the brave IRS whistleblowers revealed Joe Biden attended CEFC meetings. CEFC is a CCP-linked energy company that wanted to dominate the U.S. energy sector. pic.twitter.com/VyZnVp6N1e
.@RepJamesComer called on the National Archives to provide emails where then-VP Biden used an alias.
Based on whistleblower testimony, we know Joe Biden used pseudonym email addresses to send and receive email from his son’s associate.https://t.co/2FypyFjxeG
The evidence we have uncovered so far reveals how Joe Biden knew of, participated in & benefited from his family cashing in on the Biden name around the world.
We will continue to follow the facts and hold President Biden accountable for his corruption.
“Democrats are at a crossroads when it comes to Joe Biden. If he’s going to pull out for 2024, one would think it has to be soon. If he doesn’t, his numbers right now are awful against former President Donald Trump, the leading candidate for the Republican nomination. Trump’s winning in five of the six swing states, with his lead increasing since July. Even CNN had to admit he was up in Michigan and Georgia by some significant numbers.
You know the Democrats and the Biden team have to be tearing their hair out behind the scenes that Trump might win. So, it looks like the talking points have gone out. — it’s “Hitler Time” again! Oh, and not only is he going to destroy “democracy,” but he’s going to shoot everyone, too! This is pretty funny. Featuring people like Liz Cheney and Michael Cohen, you know to prepare for some real crazy takes. This is a festival of TDS. ”
“If you, like me, think that the January 6th defendants have often been overcharged for merely entering the Capitol building, then you should be watching this case.
The Supreme Court has just granted cert to an appeal by Joseph Fischer, who was charged with obstructing an official proceeding of Congress and thus faces a severe sentence. The charges are based on a law passed in the early aughts (2002). Those charges are based solely on his trespass and not on any violence or destruction.
Bloomberg Law’s take on the Court’s consideration of the case is, unsurprisingly, driven by the fact that it might upend some of the charges leveled at Trump. And it is hard to criticize that focus because, well…Trump. He is the big dog, and if Fischer wins his appeal some of the cases against Trump either get complicated or even go away.
The US Supreme Court added a new complication to the prosecution of Donald Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election, as the justices agreed to hear an appeal from a Jan. 6 Capitol riot defendant facing a related charge.
The justices said Wednesday they will decide whether Joseph Fischer can be charged under a 2002 law that grew out of the Enron Corp. collapse for obstructing an official proceeding. Prosecutors have also invoked that law against Trump, as well as in 300 other Capitol riot cases.
Supreme Court involvement could give Trump new grounds for arguing to push back his March 4 federal court trial in Washington until after the 2024 presidential election. Trump is currently the frontrunner for the Republican nomination.
Ultimately, a ruling favoring Fischer could upend two of the four counts Trump is facing in the case, one of four criminal prosecutions against him. Under its normal scheduling procedures, the Supreme Court will hear arguments next year and rule by the end of June.”
Trump can and should use the status of this appeal as an argument for delaying his trials. As a non-lawyer, I have no idea how the system will respond to the potential that some of Trump’s charges might become moot.
The Supreme Court’s decision to accept the case suggests that at least four justices believe there is a legitimate argument that the obstruction statute does not apply to interfering with the joint session of Congress, according to former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade.
“It creates some uncertainty for the Trump indictment, which includes two counts that rely on that same legal theory,” McQuade said. “On the other hand, two other counts do not rely on this theory at all, and so the case can and should proceed without regard to this issue.”
But Timothy Parlatore, a criminal defense lawyer who once represented Trump in the Jan. 6 prosecution, said Supreme Court review is “a potential game changer” for the ex-president’s case. If the court rules for Fischer, “it will completely gut the Trump indictment,” he said.
But let’s face it…when it comes to Trump’s legal cases, the law takes a back seat to politics. The Left is determined to get Trump embroiled in trials next year, and they have the clout to make it happen whether it is legally justified or not. I don’t think this will have a major impact on Trump or the presidential election. The “justice” system is just a political bludgeon to be used against Trump, and the charges against him are merely one weapon in the left’s arsenal against him.”
Police should stay out of it, let the drivers sort it out.
Tensions heighten between drivers and protestors on the 110 Freeway DTLA, as the roadway is blocked during Wednesday a.m. rush hour traffic pic.twitter.com/rO1itiCJy7
“Hunter Biden gave an impassioned “I am a victim” speech to the press before his scheduled deposition on Capitol Hill. The arrogance and narcissism of this man is truly something to behold.
Yeah, Hunter isn’t showing up for the scheduled deposition because he is super duper special. I added his full statement at the end.
It’s all MAGA Republicans’ fault or something.”
BREAKING: Hunter Biden arrives at the Capitol, but insists he will only answer questions under his own rules despite a lawful subpoena — and Democrat precedent. pic.twitter.com/xYx1hTqXlM
“House Republicans formally authorized their impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Wednesday, taking their most significant step toward impeaching the president.
The House voted along party lines by a vote of 221-212 to green light the inquiry.
Republicans have alleged the president financially benefited from his family’s foreign business dealings, though they haven’t publicly released evidence backing up the claims.
The votes comes after House Republicans accused the White House of stonewalling their investigation. Authorizing the inquiry, they say, could bolster their legal standing if their requests for information make it to court.
The White House says it has cooperated fully with the investigation and provided plenty of evidence disputing House Republicans’ allegations.”
The comment section on that Yahoo link is a great example of what passes for “informed” Dem voters. They all claim there is no evidence, because the only media they partake in isn’t telling them about all the evidence the GOP Oversight released above. So they’re ignorance of facts leave them vulnerable to the same old Dem talking points.
Wandering Views 
How about you pay the bills you ran up?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Biden won’t say a word. If he does, China will expose his family’s corruption with them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So they’re reforming FISA, to make it more intrusive on Americans, and Biden’s political enemies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Add this to “the left ruins everything” category.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well that’s weird. The media seems to have missed this info, since they’re not reporting it. I wonder how that happened? 🙄
—-
Yet Trump’s the one who this corrupt FBI/DoJ keep indicting for made up crimes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure this is Israel’s fault too.
https://twitter.com/Fight_Club_1999/status/1734570226665050259?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1734570226665050259%7Ctwgr%5E20e83a1a22bb010a3524ff14d9cfb890603d07c6%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fcoucy%2F2023%2F12%2F12%2Fturkish-parliament-n2390754
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paranoia, it’s what’s for breakfast.
And they should be nervous, after all the lies, hoaxes, and witch hunts they pushed, this would be justice if he did what they claim he will.
“Media/Anti-Trump People List Things Trump Might Do If He Wins – the Raging Paranoia Is Hilarious”
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/12/12/watch-mediaanti-trump-folks-list-all-the-things-trump-might-do-and-raging-paranoia-is-hilarious-n2167475
“Democrats are at a crossroads when it comes to Joe Biden. If he’s going to pull out for 2024, one would think it has to be soon. If he doesn’t, his numbers right now are awful against former President Donald Trump, the leading candidate for the Republican nomination. Trump’s winning in five of the six swing states, with his lead increasing since July. Even CNN had to admit he was up in Michigan and Georgia by some significant numbers.
You know the Democrats and the Biden team have to be tearing their hair out behind the scenes that Trump might win. So, it looks like the talking points have gone out. — it’s “Hitler Time” again! Oh, and not only is he going to destroy “democracy,” but he’s going to shoot everyone, too! This is pretty funny. Featuring people like Liz Cheney and Michael Cohen, you know to prepare for some real crazy takes. This is a festival of TDS. ”
Frum, the hack from the Atlantic, Rubin from the NYT, all the clowns are out in force. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
Once again, is there is no end to Trump’s evil powers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t believe any thinking, rational person thinks the way these clowns do. It’s funny, yet sad at the same time. TDS is real.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This could be yuge.
Libs, the corrupt media, and NTers will hate it too, so double bonus.
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023/12/13/whoa-supreme-court-will-hear-appeal-on-jan-6-case-that-could-change-everything-n598736
“If you, like me, think that the January 6th defendants have often been overcharged for merely entering the Capitol building, then you should be watching this case.
The Supreme Court has just granted cert to an appeal by Joseph Fischer, who was charged with obstructing an official proceeding of Congress and thus faces a severe sentence. The charges are based on a law passed in the early aughts (2002). Those charges are based solely on his trespass and not on any violence or destruction.
Bloomberg Law’s take on the Court’s consideration of the case is, unsurprisingly, driven by the fact that it might upend some of the charges leveled at Trump. And it is hard to criticize that focus because, well…Trump. He is the big dog, and if Fischer wins his appeal some of the cases against Trump either get complicated or even go away.
The US Supreme Court added a new complication to the prosecution of Donald Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election, as the justices agreed to hear an appeal from a Jan. 6 Capitol riot defendant facing a related charge.
The justices said Wednesday they will decide whether Joseph Fischer can be charged under a 2002 law that grew out of the Enron Corp. collapse for obstructing an official proceeding. Prosecutors have also invoked that law against Trump, as well as in 300 other Capitol riot cases.
Supreme Court involvement could give Trump new grounds for arguing to push back his March 4 federal court trial in Washington until after the 2024 presidential election. Trump is currently the frontrunner for the Republican nomination.
Ultimately, a ruling favoring Fischer could upend two of the four counts Trump is facing in the case, one of four criminal prosecutions against him. Under its normal scheduling procedures, the Supreme Court will hear arguments next year and rule by the end of June.”
Trump can and should use the status of this appeal as an argument for delaying his trials. As a non-lawyer, I have no idea how the system will respond to the potential that some of Trump’s charges might become moot.
The Supreme Court’s decision to accept the case suggests that at least four justices believe there is a legitimate argument that the obstruction statute does not apply to interfering with the joint session of Congress, according to former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade.
“It creates some uncertainty for the Trump indictment, which includes two counts that rely on that same legal theory,” McQuade said. “On the other hand, two other counts do not rely on this theory at all, and so the case can and should proceed without regard to this issue.”
But Timothy Parlatore, a criminal defense lawyer who once represented Trump in the Jan. 6 prosecution, said Supreme Court review is “a potential game changer” for the ex-president’s case. If the court rules for Fischer, “it will completely gut the Trump indictment,” he said.
But let’s face it…when it comes to Trump’s legal cases, the law takes a back seat to politics. The Left is determined to get Trump embroiled in trials next year, and they have the clout to make it happen whether it is legally justified or not. I don’t think this will have a major impact on Trump or the presidential election. The “justice” system is just a political bludgeon to be used against Trump, and the charges against him are merely one weapon in the left’s arsenal against him.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Idiots.
Police should stay out of it, let the drivers sort it out.
LikeLike
He thinks he’s above the law. And thanks to Dems, his daddy, and a corrupt DoJ, he’s probably right.
Hunter Biden Whines to the Press, Skips Scheduled Deposition
“Let me state as clearly as I can: My father was not financially involved in my business.”
—-
See above. He’s lying, like a dog faced pony soldier.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/12/hunter-biden-whines-to-the-press-likely-skipping-scheduled-deposition/
“Hunter Biden gave an impassioned “I am a victim” speech to the press before his scheduled deposition on Capitol Hill. The arrogance and narcissism of this man is truly something to behold.
Yeah, Hunter isn’t showing up for the scheduled deposition because he is super duper special. I added his full statement at the end.
It’s all MAGA Republicans’ fault or something.”
“But the speech…the language is important, especially this part.
*Financially* It’s gone from Joe Biden did not know anything, to speaking on the phone with business partners, and now not financially involved.
It keeps evolving.
Hunter claimed, “I’m here. I’m ready.”
But yeah…he’s not going to show up to the closed-door deposition.”
LikeLike
Well it’s about time.
“House Republicans authorize Joe Biden impeachment investigation in major escalation”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-republicans-authorize-joe-biden-225031220.html
“House Republicans formally authorized their impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Wednesday, taking their most significant step toward impeaching the president.
The House voted along party lines by a vote of 221-212 to green light the inquiry.
Republicans have alleged the president financially benefited from his family’s foreign business dealings, though they haven’t publicly released evidence backing up the claims.
The votes comes after House Republicans accused the White House of stonewalling their investigation. Authorizing the inquiry, they say, could bolster their legal standing if their requests for information make it to court.
The White House says it has cooperated fully with the investigation and provided plenty of evidence disputing House Republicans’ allegations.”
—
The White House is of course, lying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The comment section on that Yahoo link is a great example of what passes for “informed” Dem voters. They all claim there is no evidence, because the only media they partake in isn’t telling them about all the evidence the GOP Oversight released above. So they’re ignorance of facts leave them vulnerable to the same old Dem talking points.
The word sheep comes to mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just some horserace stuff, no sides -dj https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaed5G0wg7Q&t=210s
LikeLike